Chipping Campden: 8 Election & Jurisdiction Frauds - Forum

[Admin]

Chipping Campden Town Chartists

6 comprehensive frauds of their own elections conducted by The Town Council’s 11 Councillors, and by their local, senior Party Politician controllers

At Chipping Campden Town Council’s Election 2007 there were 11 seats, and 10 candidates:- so the candidates were all automatically elected without an election contest, and which occurred because of a comprehensive fraud involving all 10 candidates, run by their covert more senior local, National Party Politician controllers.

Firstly they stealthily failed properly publically to advertise these 11 elective posts by omitting to run a public: primary and hustings:- in addition they omitted to declare their parties and policies, and lastly they neatly arranged their own number to avoid an election contest amongst themselves.

That none of the 10 candidates officially declared a political party, shows that this election was defrauded by an undeclared political party containing the 10 neatly arranged number of candidates, which was in order to avoid any contest, and all in order to prevent The 1,906 Electors, having any election choice at all.

This election cartel’s ‘bid rigging’ crime would have been secretly arranged by local National Party Political leaders, who coordinated who would stand, to prevent an election contest, and indicated to them, not to declare their political parties and political policies, nor to give the public the opportunity publically to investigate them all, by also omitting to run a public: primary and hustings, as this would very likely give the game away to the electorate that their local election was being comprehensively defrauded by way of National Political Parties covertly acting together, comprehensively to defraud this local election in their candidates’ favour, which electorate would then likely put up some real, independent candidates, and then a free and fair, lawful election would occur.

Just to backtrack:- the incumbent 11 councillors, some being amongst the 10 candidates, by their not running a public: primary and hustings never properly publically advertise their own elective posts, which is in order that they and their political mates, and or their personal mates, are therefore always likely to be re-elected/elected either with a token contest, or as here automatically with no contest, and all of the above is just 1 comprehensive fraud among 6 used by all of this wards’ 11 Councillors; (10 automatically elected, and 1 co-opted) also by their senior, local Mainstream, National Party Politician Controllers, in order that your/their elections are constantly, entirely defrauded.

Ask yourself these two questions: firstly if there were no undeclared political parties coordinating the number of candidates so as either neatly to avoid an election contest, or failing that to have to have a negligible or token contest, then how with an electorate 1,906 could that very neat number of 10 candidates for 11 seats have occurred? The answer of course is that it was arranged by their not declaring their parties and policies also their not running public primaries and hustings & etc. Secondly if there were undeclared parties coordinating this ‘bid rigging’ cartel’s comprehensive fraud of this election, which there very clearly were, then what would happen if someone did stand and force a contested election? Of course the undeclared party would then covertly coordinate a campaign for its own, and against the candidate who had forced the contest, so the looser would be likely to be the one who isn’t part of this organised crime cartel. That is our local election system for you in practice – a near perfectly dishonest Kakestocracy gets in very time, and without even any contest offered in most cases.

Moreover these 6 comprehensive local election frauds of which I've only explained one fraud above, are used to defraud not just this local election, but the UK's local elections comprehensively, which in turn defrauds all of the UK's larger elections, in the same national political parties’ favour, as they've comprehensively impeded everyone else except their own candidates even to start in local politics via these 6 generic, comprehensive local elections' frauds.

Since their 6 comprehensive election frauds are generic to UK local elections, so I’ll leave off explaining the remaining 5 here, and just enumerate all 6 in ‘The 6 Reform Articles’ below so that I don’t have to repeat myself:- so if you do want to understand how comprehensively you are being election defrauded and by all your Cllrs and by all UK MPs in modern times, then read till the end, then maybe follow the link, re 28 ways that we're all being generally defrauded by the UK's comprehensively criminal mainstream national party politicians' oligarchy, and by their associated national and global corporatist oligarchies, including most extremely, comprehensively, by the global energy oligarchy and the global militarists-industrialists oligarchy, also all capped by the global bankers oligarchy.

By contrast, any free, fair, lawful election would occur on the basis of each candidate having both to declare their candidacy, and to supply a manifesto, also at the public primary stage; that is correctly at a public primary meeting before the nominations close, in order to ensure the electorate is given a free and fair, lawful election, which of course it wasn’t given here, at all.

At the Chipping Campden Election 2011 again there were 10 candidates, for 11 seats, so a similar comprehensive cartel ‘bid rigging’ fraud of the local election occurred in 2011 as had occurred in 2007. So the Chipping Campden Town Council's 1955 Electors certainly didn’t get a free and fair, lawful election in 2011 either, as it was still covertly wholly successfully Party Politically cartel defrauded.

A postscript about the one alleged "Independent" candidate on The Chipping Campden Town Council. In 2011 one candidate (Clive G Constable) declared on his nomination papers that he was a "Non Party Independent" candidate, meaning that he wasn't associated with any party, but he evidently was and is associated with a political party because there was clearly an undeclared political party operating in order neatly to coordinate the number of candidates so that they would either get elected automatically with no election contest at all (as occurred in 2007 & in 2011) or failing that with just a minimal/token election contest because the undeclared party would have then covertly campaigned for each other, and against the candidate who without their covert consent, had forced the contested election.

So Clive G Constable may not have been a party to the cartel when he first stood in 2007 but as soon as he saw the neatly arranged number of candidates in order to evade an election contest in 2007, he must have known that there was a mainstream, national party politicians' controlled cartel 'bid rig' defrauding the election, who had counted him in, so he was then an accessory in that cartel fraud, and a beneficiary of it, therefore a party in it. At that point he and anyone else caught in the same position should have resigned and blown the whistle on the clearly comprehensively defrauded elections both in 2007 & in 2011, but he and anyone else caught in the same position never did and never have resigned and blown the whistle, so he is a party to it, as are all of the candidates both in 2007 & 2011, also likely going back much much further.

There is a word for this type of government it's called a Kakistocracy: that is a government under the control of a nation's worst or least qualified citizens: Tjeerd Andringa Exposes the Kakistocracy (33 minutes of audio):- www.corbettreport.com/interview-1024-tjeerd-andringa-exposes-the-kakistocracy/ "Kakistocracy is defined as “rule by the worst.” Today on the program Dr. Tjeerd Andringa of the University of Groningen joins us to discuss his theory of how the kakistocracy uses child abuse to perpetuate their control, both over the victims of that abuse and its perpetrators. We also discuss what the vast majority of decent and moral people can do about this problem."

In other words, since the people of Chipping Campden so far haven’t even coherently objected to this organise covert comprehensive robbing of their council’s autonomy by national and global corporations then it will surely continue. Moreover, it is also theorised (link above), that those who are attracted to such a comprehensive political cartel abuse, could be more liable to be the type who are attracted to child abuse rings too, as the psychopathy is rather similar.

In still other words the connection between a criminal party political cartel and a child abuse ring is that there is a considered, covert abuse of power due to a juvenilia among the abused parties, who in both cases aren’t yet sufficiently mature publically coherently either to give their consent, or to object.

Moreover if the people of Chipping Campden aren't as yet mature enough to congregate and to articulate an indictment both of their councillors and of their councillors' local senior national party politician controllers regarding their national party political organised crimes regarding their town council's elections, then why would the police or anyone else get involved? So the parallels and connection between political ring abusers and paedophile ring abusers is apparent once one considers them.

Once people realise the level of comprehensive party political cartel fraud which is being practiced on them right under their own noses by all of their 11 local Councillors either directly or as accessories in this cartel, then people aught to start wondering what level of criminal conspiratorial abuse is occurring regarding the district council, the county council, also nationally politically and European politically also globally politically, where do the branches of this criminal oligarchy really reach whose roots are firmly in the local community - could not this Kakistocratic oligarchy be behind a lot of the perennial: district, county, national and global abuses we see?

For example have you ever also noticed that the national political parties' memberships are secret, which therefore makes it easy for them to run 'bid rigging' cartels, so the political parties are all acting very like masonry does, and yet they are governing this country - is that right either? By comparison when children are sexually abused in many cases they simply let it happen, because its secretive, so they don't feel articulate enough, or strong enough successfully to resist, so how long are the people of Chipping Campden going to continue to let comprehensive local political fraud to happen to them, and likely far worse as this oligarchy gets higher and more powerful, before they choose articulately and or physically to resist their local political abusers also their party political controllers?

Isn't it time to clean up your local politics where this Kakistocracy has its organised crime roots, and put in place a free fair and lawful local election process instead, where the local candidates must articulate a manifesto, whether they are party political or genuine independents, also where they must all go though a proper public primary process, so they really are all able to be publically scrutinised both for covert political rings and for the terms and conditions under which they are being elected, and of course the elections aught to be annual rather than perennial.

Surely when anyone puts their hand up to govern other people, they should of course already have a very clear plan of what they intend to try to achieve or move forward while in office, and isn't it reasonable that the electors should know that manifesto plan therefore that candidate with their plan in writing needs to be sitting in the village or town hall, for at least three evenings during a primary stage, so the electors can really scrutinise what they are likely to get, then a public meeting follows where their manifesto's plans or lack of plans which omission maybe because they wish to hide their party/partial interest, can be publically questioned.

Once people in Chipping Campden make an accurate public indictment of the present comprehensive local electoral wrongdoings by their councillors et al (see fn 7), then a more accurate assessment of what is locally electorally right to do, will be likely to develop, at which point the wicked national and global corporate 'modernity spell' maybe broken, and a greater local council, and personal autonomy, maybe obtained back from these criminally abusive absolutist national and global corporate oligarchies.

......

Fn1:- check out all 94 of the Cotswold District Town & Parish Councils’ Election Results directly at: “Cotswold District Election Results” at: www.cotswold.gov.uk/about-the-council/elections/election-results/ click; “Parish Council Elections”; as these 94 Local Elections’ results are the evidential 'smoking gun' regarding the mainstream national party politicians’ comprehensive elections frauds. If you read ‘The 6 Reform Articles’; (see Fn.7) that’s where we enumerate all 6 comprehensive frauds, so then together with this results’ link (above) you can then note that all 6 comprehensive election frauds are used in each Chipping Campden Election, and that at least 5 are used in all 94 local elections in the Cotswold District. In other words regarding framing criminal indictments the evidence is in plain view, at this link - once you read The 6 Reform Articles (below) so that you know what you're looking for.

Fn2. until a week ago this local elections results link (above) was suppressed, for the obvious reason, that if you examine it, then every result reveals compelling evidence that each local election is comprehensively party politician defrauded:- they mostly use ‘The 6 Reform Articles’ (see Fn.7) fraud 1; as more fully described in fraud 3; Fne; and or fraud 6 - with the 4 further comprehensive frauds, enhancing these first 2; (it was a Cotswold Chartist campaign that restored this results link to visibility last week, it having been repeatedly suppressed, since we first drew attention to it, in 2012).

Fn3. our brief video on comprehensive election fraud is at: www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSCU0GPqD8Y (8 minutes)

Fn4. check out 28 generic frauds & extortions run on you all, by the corporate oligarchies: www.sandysteel.co.uk then click: ‘UK/Global Frauds’. Particularly scroll to the 6 ‘Energy Frauds’ links, as energy underpins the entire economy:- so then you’ll see how the Global economy is totally defrauded by an oligarchy, and what we could easily combine & do about it.

Fn5. photographing your own completed Ballot Papers as evidence of how you voted is lawful! Recording this evidence is important, since it may become critical to have this evidence of how you really voted, in order to expose these election fraudsters’ comprehensive frauds. Even more so, since they’re now also well up for a comprehensive ballot count defraud, particularly regarding the postal ballots. So don’t let Polling Officers intimidate you into not carefully photographing your own ballot papers, by telling you anything different. Today’s Polling Staff are controlled by the criminal Mainstream National Party Politicians, and these staff are so conditioned that they never stop & ask themselves would a Jury condone this or that practice or condemn it, as fraud, which is what really determines ‘The Law’ in the UK, and not the Party Politicians’ statutory instruments, nor bureaucrats’ orders, nor anything else. But if you read about the UK Bench Justices’ 2 generic treasonous frauds, (below) you’ll get why, this conditioning can occur)

Fn 6:- about the comprehensive fraud of the forthcoming Chipping Campden Town Council, Election; 7th May 2015. Because of the successful, comprehensive frauds here, both in 2007 & in 2011, so the chances of a free & fair, lawful election on the 7th May 2015 are nil, which is why you should all:-
• not vote for any of the printed candidates till the 6 comprehensive frauds regarding The Chipping Campden Council Election, which are all enumerated below, are properly redressed,
• instead write boldly on each Ballot Paper that you are voting for yourself, and carefully photo each one, before putting it in the ballot box, as evidence; which photos are lawful to do!
• contact each other, to coordinate further lawful actions, in order to create a genuinely democratic, lawful and effectual Chipping Campden Town Council, local government.

Otherwise you’ll all continue stealthily, comprehensively to be fleeced and or slaughtered like the sheeple you currently really are, and it's run by a coalition of national and global corporations which oligarchies only interest is to maximise profit from you all, and be that by commercial profiteering, or by war profiteering:– whichever one makes them the most profit, so you the most losses – they’ll promote that. As you can see from the above, the National Party Politicians’ Corporates are comprehensively sneaky about how they go about this, and they have a bevy of local quislings, covertly to do all their local dirty work for them, and no questions asked!

Fn 7.our Reforms Articles concerning 6 comprehensive frauds of the Chipping Campden elections & elections generally:-

1. Annual Public:- Primaries, Hustings and Elections for every MP also Cllr. In addition that on every Ballot Paper there is the option for The Elector not to sign away their political power to anyone else, but to retain their political power themselves:-

Fna; UK MPs and Councillors don’t run Public: Primaries and Hustings, which is in order that their own elective posts aren’t properly publically advertised, which fraud by not properly advertising their own posts, enables the majority of UK Local Councillors and their privately invited either party associates or personal mates stealthily, repeatedly to be Elected Automatically, without any Election Contests at all, or elected with a token contest; as they collectively impeded all other candidates even to stand and if they do, to have a free and fair contest. By contrast any proper public primary enables the candidates to be publicly scrutinised, and before the Nominations Stage ends and both for stealthy rings, and for poor manifestos; Fnb; the original Chartists and Tom Payne demanded annual elections. The reason why the Party and Local Politicians never implemented this, either, is that they like to use their perennial unaccountability comprehensively to defraud the electorate. Fnc: The UK’s Party Politician MPs & Cllrs compose each Ballot Paper in such a way that each Elector can only sign away their political power to others, not retain it for themselves, which formal, legal fallacy comprehensively defrauds: power, information & money towards the Party Politicians’ and to their Party Elites, also to their usually stealthy, wealthy backers. By contrast local, national and global politics could all be conducted by a qualified, or an absolute Direct Democracy, as ancient Athens had and some modern Swiss Cities have; therefore on each Ballot Paper each elector aught to have the option to retain their political powers for themselves, therefore voting for some form of Direct Democracy in that Council or Parliament; (see a Direct Democracy reform, recommended in Article No 4 below).

2. No MP or Councillor to sit in any Parliament or Council for over 1 year.

Fn; if we restrict the total term in office in every Parliament and every Council to one year, then the power has to be shared out, which is what a genuine democracy is about.

By contrast today’s MPs and Cllrs cling on to power, for as long as possible, and now often for a life time - which is government by a parasitic clique, so not remotely a government by the people:- hence via such careerism, they also comprehensively defraud any genuine democracy.

3. All MP & Cllr candidates to publish their own manifestos, rather than what occurs nowadays, which is the comprehensive bribery both of Party Politicians and their Small Town and Rural Parish Councillor Quislings, regarding policy matters; (the latter being bribed often simply by being given petty but arbitrary power).

Fnd; currently National Party Politicians never publish their own manifestos, as they give up their own right and their constituents’ rights to decide policies to their Party Elite, in return for being promoted by that Party Elite, firstly with advertising money at their election, then with paid, public posts, which is a policy bribery system. By contrast every MP and Cllr candidate should write their own manifesto and never be bribed on any policy matter, or any public matter. Fne. Also Rural Parish and Small Town Local Election Candidates and incumbent Councillors are covertly told by their Party Politician controllers neither to declare their party, nor a manifesto, nor to run a public: primary and hustings, all which is another comprehensive policy defraud and election defraud system, but this one is tailored in order covertly comprehensively to defraud the UK's Rural Elections both in these Mainstream National Party Politicians' favour, who hold the more senior rural public posts and in favour of their covert quislings on Small Town and Rural Parish Councils; (see No 6 for the Mainstream National Party Politicians’ comprehensive fraud of the UK’s Urban Elections).

4. A two chambered ‘Bicameral System’ in each Parliament and each Council, where one Chamber is either the whole electorate if that is practicable, or otherwise selected on a random, rota basis like a Jury is, while the other Chamber is elected. Furthermore all from aged 8 onwards, are included in the Jury Chambers, & who have the vote there.


Fnf; This bicameralism; (a two chambered political system), ensures that every group in society is proportionately politically represented, not just the wealthy; so the Party Politicians' present comprehensive fraud of democracy, where they claim that their Elective Representative Councils and Parliaments are democratic places, when every underprivileged group in UK society, still has no direct representation in any of these places what so ever, is finally thoroughly addressed. Fng; Public Institutional & Public Elites’ Personal Child Abuse is Universal today, where the already comprehensively criminal State Elite institutionally abuses our children in plain view, with their 'one size fits all' and now neuro-linguistic programming Universal Curriculum, and more covertly by their condoned and or sponsored pederasty rings among Party Politicians & other Public Elites, which are in order covertly publically to control both by an elitist blackmailing system, and by a child abuse system, including by its threat to the general population, via the same elites’ secret Family Courts’ System seizing children. By contrast this measure intends to help restore children to the control of their parents, their local communities, and common law.

5. MPs not to be paid more than the minimum wage, plus out of pocket expenses, also Cllrs not to take other than out of pocket expenses.

Fn; To be a democratic MP or Cllr should be a temporary, vocational honour; so not for profit. Their expenses should be such so that no-one through poverty is denied the chance to serve. If we remove the MPs and Cllrs' excessive time in Office, and their excessive public incomes for Office, then the party political elite's present continuous offer of excessive public incomes in order comprehensively to bribe the MPs & Cllrs, on policy matters, is greatly reduced. It also means that the middle and low incomed will be able, to be directly represented in all UK elective chambers, so the present comprehensive democratic defraud of the middle and low incomed, also of low capitaled groups, in our society by the UK's senior Cllrs and MPs, will be able to be tackled.

6. All UK so called 'Local Elections' to be truly local, rather than stealthily super-duper sized, which is another Mainstream National Party Politicians' Comprehensive Elections Fraud System, used to defraud every UK large town and city election, in their favour.

Fn; Currently all of the UK’s larger towns and cities' so called 'Local Elections' have been stealthily super-duper sized by 10 to 100 fold compared with the rural local elections, which typically contain less than three hundred electors, while the former typically contain from three thousand to fifteen thousand electors, which super-duper sizing is entirely in order that the UK's larger towns & cities' electors now can't know their 'local candidates', which coerces these electors to vote for the Mainstream National Parties' Candidates at all of these still so called 'local elections':- and this comprehensive 'entry gate' elections' fraud system, in turn then benefits and protects all of the UK's Larger Towns and Cities' more senior Mainstream National Party Politicians as well, so this is a comprehensive fraud of the UK's Larger Towns' & Cities' Elections! By contrast every UK Local Council aught to have wards of under 100 hundred electors, and these wards subdivided again to as little as 10 electors per returned Cllr, so that the electors are all likely to know all of their local Cllr candidates, and vice versa, because then it becomes much harder for any local Cllrs to become engaged in any party frauds, still less in any National Party Politicians' comprehensive frauds of the UK's electors, which is what does happen in UK politics today.

27th March 2015.

The Chipping Campden Chartists:’ contact ------/-------- on facebook or T:-----/------- between ---- & ----

Cotswold Constituency Coordinator: Sandy Steel; T: 01285-850590 Ans Mach; [e-mail] ; www.sandysteel.co.uk or on facebook -

...

Chipping Campden Chartists

our 2 Reform Articles regarding The Bench Justices'
and Party Politicians' Comprehensive UK Jurisdiction:
Frauds and Robberies also Extortions and Disseizes

1. That every complainant and defendant has ready access to a Jury Trial; be it for a misdemeanour like a parking ticket, or a felony.

The Party Politicians and Bench Justices have in practice robbed and defrauded us of our inalienable right to a Jury Trial, with less than 1% of UK court cases now referred to Jury Trial:- moreover at these trials the Party Politicians and Bench Justices maliciously apply retributive punishments, in order to divide, and therefore conquer us.

Their retributive sentencing is in order to divide rather than reconcile the complainants and defendants, also the jury; which latter is fraudulently dismissed regarding sentencing. So healing, restorative, reconciliatory justice isn’t their intent, but maliciously to divide us and so conquer us, is their intent.

Their public pretext for comprehensively suppressing our rights to Jury Trial is the cost, but Juries should be as cheap as chips, since chips and tea is all that the Jurors need to perform; so it's the elaborate frauds and robberies of the Common Law rights of the plaintiffs, and defendants also jurors in order, to corrupt each jury trial, so that each finds only what the Bench Justices, and Party Politicians, also their legal accessories want it to find, that costs us all, the extra money.

So via malicious fraud and force over 99% of UK court cases are compelled through the Bench Justices’ & Party Politicians’ own corporate privatised for profit 'Civil Law Courts’, which have the same ‘divide and conquer’ the community practices.
....
By contrast Magna Carta; 1215; Section 39, reads:- “No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or deprived of his standing in any way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgment of his equals or by the law of the land”; and S.40 reads: “To no one will we sell, to no one deny or delay right or justice.”

“Some people point to Section 39’s last clause: “...or by the law of the land” and they believe that it allows The Party Politicians & Bench Justices to compel men and women to be tried by their ‘Civil Law Courts’, rather than by Jury Trial, Common Law Courts, but “The Law of the Land” only means by the precedent of previous Jury Trials:- so 'The Law of the Land' in Britain is only by Jury Trial, Common Law!”

“In other words The Party Politicians’ own Statutes and The Bench Justices’ own court decisions; i.e. their own ‘Civil Law’ isn’t ‘The Law of The Land’, so which aught only to be applied if both the complainant and defendant have given informed consent to this actually privatised justice!”
.....
By contrast: all true Jury Trial, Common Law Jurisdiction is based on past precedent, or on informed consent. Since Common Law’s origins are in Saxon Law and Dane Law, which only used Foremen and Juries, not Judges at all, so Judges aren’t necessary to UK Trials. So regarding their retributive sentencing system, the Judges aught to be dispensed with by their Juries, for this maliciously divisive sentencing, and rather the Judges & Juries should be operating preventative and healing, also restorative and reconciliatory sentencing.

So both on this jurisdiction precedent, and on this malicious process cause, (or if the Jury has any other reasonable cause, such as a Judge’s excessive costs & obfuscations, or any other divisive, perversion of Common Law), then that Judge may be set aside by the Jury, and then it alone can decide the verdict and the sentencing; if it’s according either to precedent or to the informed consent of the complainant and defendant.

Conversely; if a Judge can reasonably show that a Jury has unreasonably departed both from precedent and consent, then that Jury’s decision should be appealable to a senior Judge, who then needs must call or recall a Jury, and so on.

So while today Party Politicians and Bench Justices and their legal associates customarily use malicious force and fraud to suppress the Common Law substituting communally divisive: verdicts, sentences and judgements in order for themselves continuously to rule us, and for their own profit and power.

by contrast ordinarily what should occur is a genuine Bicameral Justice System, where the judge by checking and complementing the Jury is useful to them, and vice versa, so then they both attain a mutual informed assent over the verdict and the sentencing, also in a continuum until the complainant and defendant also give their mutual informed consents both to the verdict and the sentencing. That's the way towards reconciliatory justice, for all the parties concerned.
....

2. Withhold ‘Civil Law’:- taxes, charges and fines, till our Parliaments, Councils, Courts, Services & Utilities are run by Lawful People under Jury Trial ‘Common Law’ Jurisdiction

“withhold from all of the above criminals and their accessories their current comprehensively: defrauding and robbing also extorting and disseizing ‘Civil Law’:- taxes, fines, charges and, fees; until our Parliaments, Councils and Courts are not being run by such criminal oligarchies, but by lawful men and women, under the Common Law.”

Fn. Mainstream, National Party Politicians, Bench Justice, Lawyers, Barristers, Senior Police and their wealthy corporate clients, benefit from their privatized for profit ‘Civil Law’ Jurisdiction, so who ‘pull the wool’ so that the General Public don’t know how to access the not for profit, Common Law, so the latter pay all of the former, though the nose, in Civil Law extorted: taxes, fines, charges & fees to which no jury has consented.

For example consider the comprehensive UK Election Frauds described above, so there’s no lawful consent there. Then consider the nationalized and globalised corporatised utilities, all stolen via their Civil Law; & so neither via an informed consented to Civil Law Jurisdiction, nor under Common Law. Then also consider all the earlier Common Lands lost belonging to every village and town, again stolen, and again not via informed consented to Civil Law Jurisdiction, nor under Common Law.

Another example; consider the millions of pounds the UK Government now makes from parking & speed fines et al, where people have neither parked obstructively, nor driven carelessly of another person; so again regardless of whether the fine is lawful under Jury Trial, Common Law.

For example also consider how the Government got rid of all minor railways, including the track beds in the 1960’s therefore forcing much of the population onto the roads each day; then created mass immigration as well, and all for their own, and their colleagues’ corporatist profits, without even an overt ‘by your leave’ in any manifestos; still less any Jury Trial Common Law consents, but all covertly.

None of the above is accidental, rather it is all designed to keep ordinary peoples' noses to the grindstone in an era of mechanisation that should have brought everyone an unprecedented easy prosperity and peace, but which are anathema to any absolutist oligarchies maintaining their absolutist rule, because such require little held in common, and a chronic: ignorance, poverty, also terror, so that is what they and their quislings in every town and village have diligently, criminally created and now maintain.

So if you do look at what our National Party Politicians’ Government and most Bench Justices really do, the more you see that they are running a comprehensively criminal political and legal system in the UK to benefit their own ever increasingly wealthy, corporatist oligarchies, and allied wealthy corporatist oligarchies.

So never vote for anyone who’s not signed up to these 8 election and law reforms. If none are, then go to the polling station and spoil your ballot papers by writing boldly on each ballot paper either your own name and make it clear that you are voting only for yourself, (or if you want to remain anonymous just write something like:- “I am voting only for myself” ), then if you possibly can, carefully photograph your ballot papers before placing them in the ballot box, as evidence that you did only vote for yourself and not for any of the above, also then consider contacting each other and us, so we can help create a Grand Jury in order lawfully to pursue the above, because they are all organised ‘controlled’ fraudsters, because your elections and your law are being comprehensively defrauded and robbed, and none of them have resigned and whistle-blown as they should!


29/03/15
The Chipping Campden Chartists’ - Contact: ------/------, on facebook on T:-----/-------- between ---- & ----

Cotswold Constituency Coordinator; Sandy Steel; T: 01285-850590 Ans Mach; [e-mail] ; www.sandysteel.co.uk