Cotswold Parish/Town Councils' 102 Wards Elections Frauds

[Admin]

This forum is regarding The Cotswold Constituency's Mainstream National Corporate Party Politicians' and their Civil Servants' also their corporate allies comprehensive 'bid rigging' and 'market sharing' cartel frauds; (2007, 2011 & 2015), both of every Rural Parish Councils' Ward Election, and of every Town Councils' Ward Election, also how this is replicated across the UK and elsewhere also the general consequence to the general public of being covertly 'farmed' by these Corporate Orders and how these are controlled by a Global Corporate New World Order, and regarding coordinating both about publicly exposing these election and justice frauds, and effectively preventing them.

Since all 102 local wards' elections in this constituency have been continuously, comprehensively defrauded by the mainstream national corporate party politicians’ and their civil servants in their own cartel's candidates’ favor for many decades, and which are the ‘entry gates’ to constituency politics, so it follows that every larger election in this constituency is also defrauded in this same mainstream party politicians' and civil servants' cartel’s candidates’ favor, because everyone else has been fraudulently impeded from even getting started in politics here, consequently everyone in the Cotswold Constituency other than these cartel fraudsters, aught to withhold all non essential taxes, as you aren’t being: freely, fairly or lawfully represented in any election in this constituency.

Still further the comprehensive frauds of the elections practiced in the Cotswold Constituency are also practiced by the mainstream national corporate parties politicians and their civil servants, aided by their national and global corporate allies, and all in their own national corporate cartel parties' candidates favor, right across the UK, and this has been the case ever since we got universal suffrage, although post WW2 the cartel election frauds have become ever more corporately nationalised, and since 1979 ever more corporately globalised.

Consequently the UK's Bench Justices, Police, CPS and Military have also been comprehensively corrupted to serve this governing national and global corporate crime cartel's statutory and private orders, rather than the law of the land, which is Trial by Jury, Common Law Jurisdiction which is now suppressed to be used except in under 1% of violent crime cases. So most cases are now coerced under Bench Justice Statutory Jurisdiction, with secret courts springing up everywhere, including a Salford PO Box based national corporate court called The County Court Money Claims Center; CCMCC.

This secret PO Box CCMCC court now deals with lawfully withheld tax cases across the UK, where defendants in practice can't successfully require Trial by Jury as is their inalienable right as freemen, since the CCMCC secretly suppresses such lawful requirements, nor can they attend their own trial unless they consent to Bench Justice Statutory Jurisdiction, therefore to their proportionate defense deposition not even being considered, nor receive a verbatim court transcript showing all these tricks used by the CCMCC's highly anonymous staff to deny a free and fair, hence lawful trial.

Meanwhile the UK's tax paid Bench Justices, senior Police and their massive retinues are suppressing complaints about the blatent comprehensive defrauding of the UK's Elections, also condoning these PO Box secret courts' impersonations of courts of law; all of which are treasonous harassment under the law of the land, but no-one can now obtain such a lawful trial short of killing or seriously maiming such traitors for their continuous treasonous harassments, in their own national and global corporates' interests, rather than by delivering Trials by Jury without charge or delay when they are required, as is the law of the land to do.

Furthermore a lawful Trial by Jury should cost the tax payer not at all, as it's a freeman's responsibility to do jury service, court service and militia service in cases concerning people in their county and without charge or delay, so rather than the Jury being too expensive or too slow as the Party Politicians, Bench Justices and their corporate media allies claim in order to suppress the jury because it could sort these traitors corporate crimes out, rather it's these tax paid national corporate: Party Politicians, Bench Justices and their retinues who are too expensive and too slow, while jurors should cost the tax payer nothing, and be on 24hr call by randomly selected rota, and since justice is then publicly seen to be done, so videos of all their cases should be readily publicly accessible, so each case verdict and sentence be made readily lawfully accountable.

So under lawful Trial by Jury, Common Law Jurisdiction all court practices should be nearly the opposite to today's treasonous Bench Justices' trials which are generally harassingly conducted for their corporate profit, where case records typically are deliberately either non existent or not publicly readily accessible, so they cannot publicaly be held severally accountable for their now customary unlawful court case practices but ultimately only generally accountable. So the UK's and EU's Bench Justices needs aught to start calling lawful Trials by Jury when they are lawfully required including when they are needed in order to nullify the Corporate Orders' treasonous orders, including regarding their treasonous taxes, their constant false flagged terrorism campaigns and their continual false flagged pre-texted war crimes, as well as other party politicians' rings.

.....


The list below contains evidential details on the 102 Parish Council Wards and Town Councils' Wards which are involved in these organised mainstream, national corporate party politicians’ cartel election crimes in 2007; 2011; & 2015, also no doubt going back long before:-

I’ll examine The Aldsworth Parish Councillors' election 'bid rigging' cartel frauds in some detail, so you can extrapolate from that examination regarding the very similar party politicians' cartel ‘bid rigging’ frauds taking place in all of the other 94 parish and town wards enumerated below.

The remaining non enumerated 8 wards which are the Cirencester Town Council's Wards are where a full on election 'market sharing' cartel fraud is used instead (which if you scroll down to Cirencester Town Council you will find that explained and evidenced too):-

1. Aldsworth Parish Council (APC) has 5 seats, and just 5 candidates stood in 2007, and just 4 candidates in 2011, and just 5 candidates in 2015, so during this whole period there were no APC contested elections at all, which should invite a very strong suspicion of there being a criminal cartel operating in all three elections in any case.

Furthermore none of these 14 candidates declared on their Nomination for Ballot Forms either any political party, or that they were independent candidates or any political declaration at all, so it's clear that none of them were publicly declaring either any party or any policy manifesto, yet it is also clear that all of them were neatly coordinated in their number on each occasion, in order conveniently to avoid election contests, so without any reasonable doubt there is an undeclared party with undeclared party policies operating here at each APC Election in order to defraud the electors of any choice at all.

Still further having not declared their party or their party's manifesto policies, no doubt there was also an absence of any genuine public: primary and hustings being run at all of these elections, so that all 14 APC candidates were also always able to evade being publicly scrutinized about their comprehensive lack of any public declarations both of any political party candidature, and of any independent candidature, also of any political manifestos either.

Would all of these public declaration omissions by every APC candidate for 12 years, and yet their convenient coordinated numbers to avoid any election contest whenever they stand as candidates as well, be either a staggering coincidence, or else by a stealthy collective design, in order that covert parties can and are running local politics in Aldsworth Parish Council without telling the electorate, which of course would be a very serious organised fraud of local democracy and by extension of democracy in the area generally, as per the introductory 2nd para (see top)?

Fna. Well, for these several, clearly coordinated, comprehensive, longitudinal public declarations omissions reasons this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud of these three successive local APC elections - which coordinated comprehensive usurpation of government via fraud is also treason. Moreover because all 14 APC candidates officially have declared nothing at all politically while never the less all being coordinated in number in order to evade any election contests, means that all of the more senior party politicians and civil servants in the area can do and say whatever they like with Aldsworth, so the former are covertly in the pocket of the latter.

Fnb Furthermore since all of these APC Cllrs and all of the District Cllrs also County Cllrs are in the pockets of their national corporate parties’ elites on policy matters since they've declared no manifestos to the contrary, so we're all slaved via such as these comprehensive party politically organised omissions' frauds that constantly occur both in Aldsworth in particular and across the UK's local rural elections generally, to a national and global corporate oligarchy’s agenda, and as I've said, another type of cartel is operated comprehensively to defraud the UK's urban elections in these national and global corporations candidates' favor (see the example of Cirencester below).

Still further; as the UK's party politicians don't declare proper manifestos at the national party political level either, so these in turn are controlled by those who control the top global corporations, who from my research seem to be the heads of about 300 families, many of them royal but led by a small cartel of non royal banking families who collectively are the controlling shareholders behind the private owned US Fed central bank and its parent central bank; The BIS in Basel, therefore who control global money supplies by way of their appointees at the US Fed and at the BIS.

These 300 or so families at the head of which are the banking families who control our money supply and all of who; no doubt are financially based in tax havens, are farming the Global General Public through their onshore National and Global Corporate entities and according to their Bilderberg's and Club of Rome's private New World Order agenda, which involves what ordinary farmers do to their stock, but these are doing this to the Global General Public, and according to their billionaire and trillionaire oligarchs' plana. Meanwhile Cllrs like those who comprehensively fraud the APC Elections in favor of the UK's national corporate political parties as well as themselves, are their local 'judas pigs' and 'judas sheep'.

The UK's local Cllrs who are covertly corporately organised in order comprehensively to defraud the UK's elective democratic government and both for their corporate pay masters and for themselves, will kiss our babies if we let them, because they know that most electors can't distinguish their smiles and kisses as tools to betray the local common interest, and substitute their national and global corporate shareholders and executives interests, including their own interests, being these corporates' covertly organised local agents. These fraudsters are successfully managed by their national corporate political parties aided by international secret societies and services including the right wing Masonry Lodges, and the left wing bogus charity Common Purpose, because the UK general public have never looked at their local Cllrs' comprehensive local elections frauds or how or why these Cllrs ever become involved in these comprehensive UK's Elections' frauds, or the nationalising and now globalising corporate consequences.

So to cut a long story short the UK general public is nowadays 'farmed' by about 300 tax haven based global corporate billionaire and trillionaire 'farmers' through their national and global corporates' fraudulent control of UK elective politics and so of UK security, and of UK law, and media, hence also our food, fuel, and money supply, meanwhile the UK general public can't figure out how to determine that their comprehensively defrauded local elections can be made free and fair or how their civil courts and criminal courts can be made free and fair, which would be the first steps to freeing ourselves from these 'Corporate Orders' whose leaders' intent is to fleece and to slaughter we; the general public, to maximise their oligarchies profit and power including their senior corporate executive retinues, meaning the Kissingers, Rumsvelts, Blaires, Camerons et al.

To start to free ourselves politically we require free and fair public primaries where local candidates publicly have to produce manifestos covering all key aspects of the way we are governed, then public hustings where they are publicly exhaustively questioned on their manifestos' omissions and distortions, then annual elections, so that we get publicly honest people leading us locally politically and who are only in their constituents' common pocket, not in the corporates' pockets, so we know both where we are being led, and that it is way away from the public and private national and global corporate profiteers' human fleecing sheds, and human slaughtering parlors that today's UK Cllrs and MPs are leading us into all the time.

Then regarding UK justice we need to withold taxes from the corporate criminal party politicians and require lawful Trial by Jury, Common Law Jurisdiction without charge or delay until we get such lawful trials , which is the law of the land, and to repudiate the cartel criminal, national corporate party politicians' statutory instruments, and their bench justices' orders, where these significantly contradict the law of the land, as they do particularly regarding taxing the middle and low incomed, which latter still have no direct representation in councils, or in parliaments or in 99%+ of the courts, while these fraudulent, extortive public assemblies members and courts' members never the less presume themselves to be freely and fairly democratically consented to, which is already very far from the case, and getting less the case every day.

......

2. Ampney Crucis Parish Council (ACPC) has 7 seats, but in 2007 there were just 5 candidates who stood, and in 2011 there were just 4 candidates, and in 2015 there were just 7 candidates, all of which in itself is highly suspicious that a criminal cartel is operating; moreover in addition to these neatly convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at each ACPC Election, also none of the candidates officially declared any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore it is clear that none of them declared a policy manifesto either, or arranged any genuine public: primary and hustings either:- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a comprehensive, mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated ‘bid rigging’ cartel election fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

3. Andoversford Parish Council; (APC) has 7 seats, and in 2007 there were just 5 candidates who stood, and in 2011 just 4, and in 2015 just 8:- moreover in addition to the always neatly convenient nos of candidates in order either to avoid an election contest entirely, or failing that to have a negligibly token contest, yet also none of the candidates officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, hence its clear that the councillors never arranged any genuine public: primary and hustings either:- (see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a comprehensive, mainstream national party politicians’ election fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud both implications & consequences).

4. Avening Parish Council (APC) has 9 seats, and just 6 candidates stood in 2007 and just 9 candidates in 2011, and just 8 in 2015:- moreover in addition to the convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at each APC Election, also none of them declared any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore its clear that none of them declared a policy manifesto either, nor yet did the organise a public: primary and hustings. See Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive ‘bid rigging’ cartel election fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

5. Bagendon Parish Council (BPC) has 7 seats, and just 6 candidates stood in 2007, and just 5 candidates in 2011, and just 8 in 2015, moreover in addition to the always neatly convenient nos of candidates in order either to avoid an election contest entirely, or failing that to have a negligibly token contest, yet also none of the candidates involved declared any political party, and just one; Allan G Hare, declared that he is an independent candidate:- so its evident both that these candidates didn't distribute policy manifestos, and that the incumbent councillors didn't organise any genuine public: primary or hustings so the candidates couldn't be publically scrutanised either:- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why, with the possible exception of Allan Hare, that all of these coordinated omissions together is evidently indicative of a comprehensive, mainstream national party politicians’ ‘bid rigging’ cartel election fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud both implications & consequences.

6. Barrington Parish Council (BPC) has 5 seats, and just 5 candidates stood in 2007 and just 3 in 2011 and just 4 in 2015:- moreover in addition to the convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at each BPC Election, also none of them declared any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore its clear both that none of them declared a policy manifesto either and that the incumbent councillors didnt organise a public: primary and hustings, so the candidates couldnt be publicly scrutanised about their coordinated numbers and party and policy ommissions:- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why all this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

7. Baunton Parish Council (BPC) has 7 seats, and just 7 candidates stood in 2007 and just 7 in 2011 and just 6 in 2015:- moreover in addition to the always neatly convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest entirely, yet also none of the candidates involved officially declared either any political party, while just one candidate in 2015 declared that he was an ‘independent’ candidate (Peter A Todd) :- so its clear both that with the possible exception of Todd, that these candidates also didn't declare any manifestos, and that the incumbent councillors didnt organise a public: primary and hustings either so that the candidates could evade public scrutiny about their coordinated both numbers and absence of policy manifestos:- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why all this is evidently a comprehensive, mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated election fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud both implications and consequences.

8. Beverstone Parish Council (BPC) has 7 seats, and just 5 candidates stood in 2007, and just 5 in 2011, and just 4 in 2015:- moreover in addition to the convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at each BPC Election, also none of them declared any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none of them declared any policy manifestos either:- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

9. Bibury Parish Council (BPC) has 7 seats, and just 7 candidates stood in 2007, and just 6 in 2011, and just 5 in 2015, :- moreover in addition to the convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at each BPC Election, also none of them declared any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none of them declared any policy manifestos either:- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

10. Bledington Parish Council (BPC) has 7 Cllr Seats, and just 6 candidates stood in 2007 and just 6 in 2011, and just 7 in 2015:- moreover in addition to the convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at each BPC Election, also none of them declared any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none of them declared any policy manifestos either:- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

11. Blockley Parish Council: Aston Magna Ward (BPCAMW) has 2 Cllr Seats, and just 2 candidates in 2007, and just 2 in 2011, and just 2 in 2015:- moreover in addition to the convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at each BAMWPC Election, also none of them declared any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none of them declared any policy manifestos either:- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

12. Blockley Parish Council: Blockley Ward (BPCBW) has 7 Cllr Seats, and just 3 candidates in 2007, and just 3 in 2011 and just 5 in 2015:- moreover in addition to the convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at each BPC Election, also none of them declared any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none of them declared any policy manifestos either:- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

13. Blockley Parish Council: Paxford Ward: (BPCPW) has 2 seats, and just 2 candidates standing in 2007, and N/A in 2011 and in 2015,

14. Bourton on the Hill Parish Council (BotHPC) has 7 seats, and just 5 candidates stood in 2007, and just 6 in 2011 and just 6 in 2015:- which in itself is highly suspicious that a cartel is operating; moreover in addition to the neatly convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at each BotHPC Election, also none of the candidates officially declared any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none of them declared any policy manifesto either:- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a comprehensive, mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated ‘bid rigging’ cartel election fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

15. The Bourton on the Water Parish Council’s new SE Ward (BotWPCSEW)was carved out of the BotWPC's old single ward (see below) in 2015, and although we're not yet told, it probably has 3 seats, and in any case in 2015 just 2 candidates stood for it, and it was uncontested, and neither candidate declared a political party, nor that they were independent candidates, therefore neither publically declared a policy manifesto and of course there was no public primary and hustings so these candidates could also evade all public scrutiny regarding their absence of political declarations:- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

16. Bourton on the Water Parish Council (BotWPC) until 2015 used to have 11 seats, and just 9 candidates stood in 2007, and just 7 stood in 2011, while its new: Bourton Village Ward (BotWVW) has 8 seats, and just 9 candidates stood in 2015:- moreover in addition to the convenient nos of candidates in order firstly to avoid an election contest entirely, then failing that to have a token negligible contest all of which is suspicious enough of a cartel, also none of these candidates have ever officially declared any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none of them have declared policy manifestos either, moreover there was no public primary and hustings so they could all evade public scrutiny about all of their political declaration omissions:- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

17. Boxwell & Leighterton Parish Council (B&LPC) has 5 seats, and just 5 candidates stood in 2007 and just 3 candidates in 2011 and just 4 in 2015:- which in itself is highly suspicious that a cartel is operating; moreover in addition to the neatly convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at each B&LPC Election, also none of the candidates officially declared any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none of them declared policy manifestos either:- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a comprehensive, mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated ‘bid rigging’ cartel election fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

18. Brimpsfield Parish Council: Brimpsfield Ward (BPCBW) has 5 seats, and just 6 candidates stood in 2007 and just 5 candidates in 2011, and just 2 in 2015:- which in itself is highly suspicious that a cartel is operating; moreover in addition to the neatly convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at each BPCBW Election, also none of the candidates officially declared a political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none of them declared policy manifestos either:- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a comprehensive, mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated ‘bid rigging’ cartel election fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

19. Brimpsfield Parish Council: Caudle Green Ward has 2 seats, and just 2 candidates in 2007 and just 1 candidate in 2011and just 2 candidates in 2015:- :- which in itself is highly suspicious that a cartel is operating; moreover in addition to the neatly convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at each BCPCG Election, also none of the candidates officially declared any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none of them declared a policy manifesto either:- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a comprehensive, mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated ‘bid rigging’ cartel election fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

20. Broadwell: has 7 Cllr Seats, and just 5 candidates in 2007 and just 4 in 2011 and just 4 in 2015:- which in itself is highly suspicious that a cartel is operating; moreover in addition to the convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at each BPC Election, also none of the candidates officially declared any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none of them declared policy manifestos either:- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a comprehensive, mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated ‘bid rigging’ cartel election fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

21. Chedworth Parish Council (CPC): has 7 Cllr Seats, and just 7 candidates stood in 2007, and just 4 in 2011, then 10 stood in 2015, but despite that finally there was a contest in 2015, so superficially it appeared that there might not be a cartel operating this time, yet typically once again none of the 10 candidates declared any political party, and just ; Ian Morgan, declared that he was an independent candidate, therefore at least 9 candidates didn’t declare any policy manifestos either, so what was really happening here in 2015 was that two undeclared parties with their concomitant undeclared party policy manifestos were competing, which means the electors still were being deliberately, co-ordinately, comprehensively misinformed, so this is once again neither a free, fair or lawful election:- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why excepting possibly Ian Morgan that this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

22. Cherrington Parish Council (CPC): has 5 seats, and just 5 candidates stood in 2007 and just 3 in 2011, and just 5 in 2015: moreover in addition to the convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at each CPC Election, also none of them declared any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none of them declared any policy manifestos either:- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

23. Chipping Campden Town Council has 11 seats and just 10 candidates stod in 2007, and just 10 in 2011, and just 12 in 2015: moreover in addition to the always neatly convenient nos of candidates in order either to avoid an election contest entirely, or failing that to have a negligibly token contest which is suspicious in itself of a cartel, yet also none of the candidates involved declared any political party, and just one; Michael J Haines, declared that he is an independent candidate, therefore at least 11 didn’t declare any policy manifesto either:- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why, with the possible exception of Allan Hare, that this is evidently a comprehensive, mainstream national party politicians’ ‘bid rigging’ cartel election fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud both implications & consequences.

Cirencester Town Council’s new Abbey Ward (CTCAW) has replaced much of the now abolished Park Ward. The Abbey Ward has just 2 seats, but we are not yet told for how many electors it has, but it has to be over 2000 electors, and for which ward just 2 Lib Dems, & 1 Con are standing in 2015.

Fn C. That only national parties’ candidates are standing at this so still called ‘local election’ demonstrates this isn’t a local election at all, but it has been gerrymandered by supersizing its electorate’s size by a factor of about tenfold to around 2000 electors, compared with a typical rural local ward’s electorate of 200 to 300 electors, and all in order that the former 2000 or so electors then don’t know their so called ‘local candidates’ personally, so these electors are being coerced to vote for the national parties’ declared candidates instead, at their still so called ‘local election’, so it’s a cartel ‘market share’ fraud by the LDs & by the Cons involved, in their own candidates’ favour, also by the Electoral Commissioners, CEO and local Returning Officer, who all collaborate in this gerrymandering of local elections’ fraud via supersizing the still so called 'local wards' and right across all eight of Cirencester Town Council’s so called ‘local elections’:- similarly right across the UK in all of the other larger towns and cities' still so called ‘local elections’ which in most cases are even larger ranging from 2000 up to in some cases 15,000 electors, in the still so called 'local election'.


Cirencester Town: Park Ward: has been abolished in 2015 and substituted largely by the new Abbey Ward, but the former ward had 3 seats, and 5 candidates in 2007, and 6 candidates in 2011, but all of these were national parties' declared candidates at this still so called 'local election':- see Cirencester Town Council’s Abbey Ward’s Fn C (above) for how there was a comparative, comprehensive gerrymandering, supersizing 'market sharing' cartel fraud of this so called ‘local ward’ in favour of all of the mainstream national parties’ declared candidates involved, so that no-one else but national parties' declared candidates have stood, at these two so called ‘local elections'.

Cirencester Town Council Beeches Ward (CTCBW) had 3 seats, and just 3 candidates stood in 2007, then 6 candidates in 2011, and now in 2015 it has just 2 seats, with just 4 candidates standing; 1 Lab, 2 LD, 1 Con: see The Cirencester Town Council’s Abbey Ward’s Fn C (above) for how there is a comparative, comprehensive gerrymandering, supersizing cartel fraud of this still so called ‘local ward’ election in favour of all the mainstream national parties’ declared candidates involved, which occurs at each election, such that no-one else ever even stands at these still so called local elections, except declared national party politicians.

Cirencester Town Council: Chesterton Ward; (CTCCW), had 3 seats, and just 3 candidates stood in 2007, and just 3 in 2011, then the ward had 2 seats in 2015, for which just two candidates stood, and both LDs:- see The Cirencester Town Council’s Abbey Ward’s Fn C (above) for how there is a comparative , comprehensive gerrymandering, supersizing cartel fraud of this still so called ‘local ward’ election in favour of all of the mainstream national parties’ declared candidates involved, so that no-one else ever even stands, at these still so called local ward's ‘local elections’.

Cirencester Town Council’s new New Mills Ward (CTCNM) has 1 seat for which 2 candidates have stood in 2015, 1 LD & 1 Con. See Cirencester Town Council’s Abbey Ward’s Fn C (above) for how there is a comparative comprehensive gerrymandering, supersizing cartel fraud of this still so called ‘local ward’ in favour of all of the declared mainstream national parties’ candidates involved, so that no-one else has stood, at this still so called ‘local election’.

Cirencester Town Council’s new Four Acres Ward, (CTCFAW). We’re not yet officially told but this new ward probably has 2 seats, and we are already officialy told that in 2015 just 2 LD candidates stood, so there was no election contest in 2015:- see Cirencester Town Council’s Abbey Ward’s FnC (above) for how there is a comprehensive gerrymandering, supersizing cartel fraud of this still so called ‘local ward’ in favour of all of the mainstream national parties’ candidates involved, so that no-one else has stood, except national party candidates at this still so called ‘local election’ .

Cirencester Town Council’s: new St Michael’s Ward (CTCStM) has 2 seats and 2 Lib Dem, 1 Con & 1 Ind candidate (Matt Helm) stood in 2015, see Cirencester Town Council’s Abbey Ward’s Fn C (above) for how there was a comparative comprehensive gerrymandering, supersizing cartel 'market sharing' fraud of this still so called ‘local ward’ in favour of the mainstream national parties’ candidates involved, so that no-one but national party politicians have stood, at this still so called ‘local election’, excepting Matt Helm, if he is a genuine independent, as demonstrated by whether he has distributed a distinctly independent policy manifesto or not.

Cirencester Town Council: Stratton Ward (CTCSW) had 3 seats, and just one candidate stood in 2007 and just 3 in 2011 and now in 2015 it has just 2 seats and just 2 LDs & 1 Con stood in 2015:- see Cirencester Town Council’s Abbey Ward’s Fn C (above) for how there was a comparative, comprehensive gerrymandering, supersizing cartel fraud of this still so called ‘local ward’ in favour of the mainstream national parties’ candidates involved, so that no-one else has stood, at this still so called ‘local election’.

Cirencester Town Council: Watermoor Ward (CTCWW) had 3 seats, and just 2 candidates stood in 2007, and just 2 in 2011 and the ward had just 2 seats in 2015 and just 2 LDs have stood:- see Cirencester Town Council’s Abbey Ward’s Fn C (above) for how there was a comparative, comprehensive gerrymandering, supersizing cartel fraud of this still so called ‘local ward’ in favour of all of the mainstream national parties’ candidates involved, so that no-one else has stood except national party candidates, have stood at this still so called ‘local election’.

24. Coates Parish Council (CPC) has 7 seats, and just 7 candidates stood in 2007 and just 5 in 2011and just 6 in 2015:- moreover in addition to the suspiciously convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at each CPC Election, also none of them declared any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none of them declared any policy manifestos either, moreover the councillors here also omit to run any public primary and hustings each time so that the candidates cant be publically scrutinised regarding all of these apparently coordinated convenient omissions of public declarations regarding their political parties and their political policies :- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

25. Coberley Parish Council (CPC) has 5 seats, and just 4 candidates stood in 2007: and just 5 in 2011, and just 5 in 2015:- moreover in addition to the suspiciously convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at each CPC Election, also none of them declared any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none of them declared any policy manifestos either, moreover the councillors here also omit to run any public primary and hustings each time so that the candidates cant be publically scrutinised regarding all of these apparently coordinated convenient omissions of public declarations regarding their political parties and their political policies :- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

26. Cold Aston Parish Council (CAPC) has 5 seats, and 8 candidates stood in 2007 and just 3 in 2011 and just 4 in 2015 :- moreover in addition to the suspiciously convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at two of these CPC Election, also none of the candidates declared any political party at any of these three elections, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none of them declared any policy manifestos either, moreover the councillors here also omitted to run any public primary and hustings each time so that the candidates can't be publically scrutinised regarding all of their apparently coordinated convenient omissions of public declarations regarding their political parties and their political policies, regarding the sudden jump to 8 candidates in 2007 but none of the candidates officially declaring any party or manifesto policies this suggest that 2 undeclared political parties were contesting, so the electors still certainly didn't receive a free, fair or lawful election but yet another comprehensively party politicians' 'bid rig' cartel defrauded election :- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

27. Coln St Aldwyns Parish Council (CStAPC) has 5 seats, and just 7 candidates stood in 2007, and just 5 in 2011, and just 5 in 2015 :-moreover in addition to the suspiciously convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at 2 out of these 3 CStAPC Elections, also none of the candidates at any of these 3 elections officially declared any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none of them declared a policy manifesto either, moreover the councillors here also always omit to run any public primary and hustings so that all of these candidates for local political office couldn't be publically scrutinised regarding all of these candidates apparently coordinated convenient omissions of public declarations regarding both their political parties and their political policies:- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

28. Coln St Dennis Parish Council (CStDPC) has 5 seats, and just 5 candidates stood in 2007 and just 5 in 2011and just 5 in 2015:- moreover in addition to the suspiciously convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at each CStD PC Election, also none of them officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none of them declared any policy manifestos either, moreover the councillors here also omit to run any public primary and hustings each time so that these candidates for political office can't be publically scrutinised regarding all of their apparently coordinated convenient omissions of public declarations regarding their political parties and their political policies :- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

29. Condicote Parish Council (CPC) has 5 seats, and just 4 candidates stood in 2007 and just 5 in 2011, and just 5 in 2015: -moreover in addition to the suspiciously convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at each CStD PC Election, also none of them officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none of them declared any policy manifestos either, moreover the councillors here also omit to run any public primary and hustings each time so that these candidates for political office can't be publically scrutinised regarding all of their apparently coordinated convenient omissions of public declarations regarding their political parties and their political policies :- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

.30. Cowley Parish Council (CPC) has 7 seats, and just 1 candidate stood in 2007 and just 6 in 201, and just 3 in 2015:- moreover in addition to the suspiciously convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at each CStD PC Election, also none of them officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none of them declared a policy manifesto either, moreover the councillors here also omit to run any public primary and hustings each time so that these candidates for political office can't be publically scrutinised regarding all of their apparently coordinated convenient omissions of public declarations regarding their political parties and their political policies :- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

31. Cutsdean Parish Council (CPC) has 5 seats, and just 5 candidates stood in 2007 and just 6 candidates in 2011,and just 4 in 2015:- moreover in addition to the always neatly convenient nos of candidates in order either to avoid an election contest entirely, or failing that to have a negligibly token contest which is highly suspicious of a cartel in of itself, yet also none of the candidates officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, also the councillors never arranged a public: primary and hustings :- (see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a comprehensive, mainstream national party politicians’ election fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud both implications & consequences).

32. Daglingworth Parish Council (DPC) has 5 seats, and just 4 candidates stood in 2007and then just 7candidates in 2011and just 5 in 2015:- moreover in addition to the always neatly convenient nos of candidates in order either to avoid an election contest entirely, or failing that to have a negligibly token contest, which is highly suspicious of a criminal cartel operating each time, yet also none of the candidates officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, also the councillors never arrange a public: primary and hustings so the candidates (including themselves) can never be publically scrutinised by the electorate regarding their apparently coordinated absence both of party political declarations and of manifesto policy declarations :- (see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a comprehensive, mainstream national party politicians’ election fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud both implications & consequences).

33. Didmartin Parish Council (DPC) has 7 seats, and just 6 candidates stood in 2007 and just 9 candidates in 2011and just 6 in 2015:- moreover in addition to the always neatly convenient nos of candidates in order either to avoid an election contest entirely, or failing that to have a rather negligibly token contest, which is highly suspicious of a criminal either cartel or cartels are operating each time, yet also none of the candidates officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, also the councillors never arrange a public: primary and hustings so the candidates (including themselves) can never be publically scrutinised by the electorate, (see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive elections 'bid rigging' cartel's(s') fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud both implications & consequences).

34. Dowdiswell Parish Council (DPC) has 5 seats, and just 3 candidates stood in 2007 and just 4 in 2011and just 4 in 2015:- moreover in addition to the always neatly convenient nos of candidates in order either to avoid an election contest entirely, or failing that to have a negligibly token contest, which is highly suspicious of a criminal cartel operating each time, yet also none of the candidates officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, also the councillors never arrange a public: primary and hustings so the candidates (including themselves) can never be publically scrutinised by the electorate regarding their apparently coordinated absence both of party political declarations and of manifesto policy declarations :- (see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a comprehensive, mainstream national party politicians’ election fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud both implications & consequences).

35. Down Ampney Parish Council (DAPC) has 7 seats, and in 2007 just 8 candidates stood, and in 2011 just 8, and in 2015 just 9 candidates. I think DAPC is unique among the parishes in this list, for always having a contested election since 2007 which is to be lightly applauded, however none of the candidates involved officially declared either any political party, or yet that they were independent candidates, therefor there was and is the usual notable absence of declared policy manifestos by these candidates, also the councillors never arrange a public: primary and hustings so these candidates (including the councillors themselves) can never be publically scrutinised by the electorate regarding their apparently coordinated absence both of party political declarations and of manifesto policy declarations, so it's clear that the DAPC's Elections still aren't free, fair and lawful :- (see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a comprehensive, mainstream national party politicians’ election fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud both implications & consequences).

36. Driffield Parish Council (DPC) has 5 seats, and just 5 candidates stood in 2007 and just 4 in 2011and just 5 in 2015:- moreover in addition to suspiciously the convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at each CStD PC Election, also none of them officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none of them declared any policy manifestos either, moreover the councillors here also omit to run any public primary and hustings each time so that these candidates for political office can't be publically scrutinised regarding all of their apparently coordinated convenient omissions of public declarations regarding their political parties and their political policies :- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

37. Duntisbourne Abbotts Parish Council (DAPC) has 5 seats, and 7 candidates stood in 2007 and just 4 in 2011and just 5 in 2015:- moreover in addition to the always neatly convenient nos of candidates in order either to avoid an election contest entirely, or failing that to have a negligibly token contest, which is highly suspicious of a criminal cartel operating each time, yet also none of the candidates officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, also the councillors never arrange a public: primary and hustings so the candidates (including themselves) can never be publically scrutinised by the electorate regarding their apparently coordinated absence both of party political declarations and of manifesto policy declarations :- (see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a comprehensive, mainstream national party politicians’ election fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud both implications & consequences).

38. Duntisbourne Rouse Parish Council (DRPC) has 2 seats, and just 3 candidates stood in 2007 and just 2 stood in 2011, and just 2 in 2015:- moreover in addition to the always neatly convenient nos of candidates in order either to avoid an election contest entirely, or failing that to have a negligibly token contest, which is highly suspicious that a criminal cartel is operating each time, yet also none of the candidates officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, also the councillors never arrange a public: primary and hustings so the candidates (including themselves) can never be publically scrutinised by the electorate regarding their apparently coordinated omissions both of party political declarations and of manifesto policy declarations :- (see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a comprehensive, mainstream national party politicians’ election fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud both implications & consequences).

39. Eastleach Parish Council (EPC) has 7 seats, and just 7 candidates stood in 2007, and just 4 stood in 2011, and just 7 in 2015- moreover in addition to suspiciously the convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at each CStD PC Election, also none of them officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none of them declared any policy manifestos either, moreover the councillors here also omit to run any public primary and hustings each time so that these candidates for political office can't be publically scrutinised regarding all of their apparently coordinated convenient omissions of public declarations regarding their political parties and their political policies :- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

40. Ebrington Parish Council (EPC) has 7 seats, and just 4 candidates stood in 2007 and just 9 candidates in 2011, and just 7 in 2015:- moreover in addition to the always neatly convenient nos of candidates in order either to avoid an election contest entirely, or failing that to have something of a negligibly token contest, which is highly suspicious that one or more criminal cartels are operating each time, yet also none of the candidates officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, also the councillors never arrange a public: primary and hustings so the candidates (including themselves) can never be publically scrutinised by the electorate regarding their apparently coordinated omissions both of party political declarations and of manifesto policy declarations :- (see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a comprehensive, mainstream national party politicians’ election fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud both implications & consequences).

41. Elkstone Parish Council (EPC) has 5 seats, and just 5 candidates in 2007 and just 3 stood in 2011 and just 4 in 2015 :- moreover in addition to the suspiciously convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at each EPC Election, also none of them officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none of them declared any policy manifesto either, moreover the councillors here also omit to run any public primary and hustings each time so that all of these candidates for political office can't ever be publically scrutinised regarding all of their apparently coordinated convenient omissions of public declarations regarding their political parties and their political policies :- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

42. Evenlode Parish Council (EPC) has 5 seats, and just 5 candidates in 2007 and just 5 in 2011, and just 5 in 2015:- moreover in addition to the suspiciously convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at each EPC Election, also none of them officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none of them declared any policy manifesto either, moreover the councillors here also omit to run any public primary and hustings each time so that all of these candidates for local political office can't ever be publically scrutinised regarding all of their apparently coordinated convenient omissions of public declarations regarding their political parties and their political policies:- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

43. Fairford Town Council’s new North Ward (FTCNW). This ward was created in 2015 and it has as yet an unpublished no of seats, but it's certainly 7 or more seats, as we do know that just 7 candidates stood in 2015 and there wasn't any election contest :-moreover in addition to the suspiciously convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest, also none of them officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none of them declared any policy manifestos either, moreover the councillors here also omit to run any public primary and hustings each time so that these 7 candidates for political office couldn't be publically scrutinised regarding all of their apparently coordinated convenient omissions of public declarations regarding their political parties and their political policies:- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

44. Fairford Town Council’s new South Ward (FTCSW). This ward was created in 2015 and it has as yet an unpublished no of seats, but it certainly has 4 seats or more, because we do know that just 4 candidates stood in 2015 and there wasn't any election contest, which lack of any competition should raise the suspicion that a criminal cartel is operating :-moreover in addition to the suspiciously convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest, also none of the 4 officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none of them declared any policy manifestos either, moreover the FTC councillors here also omitted to run any public primary and hustings so that these 4 candidates for local political office couldn't be publically scrutinised regarding all of their apparently coordinated convenient omissions of public declarations regarding both any political parties and any political manifesto policies:- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

Fairford Town Council (FTC):- until 2015 the FTC used to have a Town Ward with 11 seats, and just 11 candidates stood for it in 2007, and just 12 candidates stood for it in 2011 (incl 2 indis)

Fairford Town Council.(FTC):- until 2015 FTC had The Horcott Ward which had just 2 seats and just 2 candidates stood in 2007, and just 2 in 2011; then this ward was incorporated into Fairford Town Council's South Ward in 2015.

45. Great Rissington Parish Council (GRPC) has 7 seats, and just 7 candidates stood in 2007, and just 6 in 2011, and just 4 in 2015:- moreover in addition to the suspiciously convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at each CStD PC Election, also none of them officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none of them declared any policy manifestos either, moreover the councillors here also omit to run any public primary and hustings each time so that all of these candidates for political office can't be publically scrutinised regarding all of their apparently coordinated convenient omissions of public declarations regarding their political parties and their political policies:- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

46. Guiting Power Parish Council (GPPC) has 7 seats, and just 7 candidates stood in 2007, and just 3 in 2011, and just 7 in 2015:-moreover in addition to the suspiciously convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at each GPPC Election, also none of them officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none of them declared a policy manifesto either, moreover the councillors here also omit to run any public primary and hustings each time so that all of these candidates for local political office can't ever be publically scrutinised regarding all of their apparently coordinated convenient omissions of public declarations regarding their political parties and their political policies:- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

47. Hatherop Parish Council (HPC) has 5 seats, and just 5 in 2007, and just 4 in 2011and just 5 in 2015:- moreover in addition to the suspiciously convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at each HPC Election, also none of them officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none of them declared any policy manifesto either, moreover the councillors here also omit to run any public primary and hustings each time so that all of these candidates for local political office can't ever be publically scrutinised regarding all of their apparently coordinated convenient omissions of public declarations regarding their political parties and their political policies:- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

48. Kemble Parish Council (KPC) has 9 seats, and just 5 in 2007 and just 7 candidates stood in 2011and just 9 in 2015:- moreover in addition to the suspiciously convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at each KPC Election, also excepting Nicky Baber LD (2015) none of them officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none of them excepting NB declared any policy manifesto either, moreover the councillors here also omit to run any public primary and hustings each time so that all of these candidates for local political office can't ever be publically scrutinised regarding all of their apparently coordinated convenient omissions of public declarations regarding their political parties and their political policies:- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

49. Kempsford Parish Council (KPC) has 7 seats, and just 4 candidates stood in 2007, and just 6 in 2011,and just 8 in 2015:- moreover in addition to the suspiciously convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at each KPC Election, also none of them officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none of them declared any policy manifesto either, moreover the councillors here also omit to run any public primary and hustings each time so that all of these candidates for local political office can't ever be publically scrutinised regarding all of their apparently coordinated convenient omissions of public declarations regarding their political parties and their political policies:- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

50. Kingscote Parish Council (KPC) has 5 seats, and just 6 candidates stood in 2007 and just 3 in 2011, and just 5 in 2015:- moreover in addition to the always neatly convenient nos of candidates in order either to avoid an election contest entirely, or failing that to have a negligibly token contest, which is highly suspicious that a criminal cartel is operating each time, yet also none of the candidates officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, also the councillors never arrange a public: primary and hustings, so the candidates (including themselves) can never be publically scrutinised by the electorate regarding their apparently coordinated omissions both of party political declarations and of manifesto policy declarations :- (see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a comprehensive, mainstream national party politicians’ election fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud both implications & consequences).

51. Lechlade Town Council (LTC) has 13 seats, and just 13 candidates in 2007 and just 13 candidates in 2011, and just 8 in 2015 :- moreover in addition to the suspiciously convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at each LTC Election, also none of the 8 candidates in 2015 officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none of them declared a policy manifesto either, moreover the councillors here also always omit to run any public: primary and hustings each time so that all of the candidates for local political office can't ever be publically scrutinised regarding all of their apparently coordinated convenient omissions of public declarations regarding both their political parties and their political policies:- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

52. Little Rissington Parish Council (LRPC) has 5 seats, and just 5 candidates stood in 2007 and just 6 candidates in 2011, and just 5 in 2015:- moreover in addition to the always neatly convenient nos of candidates in order either to avoid an election contest entirely, or failing that to have a negligibly token contest, which is highly suspicious that a criminal cartel is operating each time, yet also none of the candidates officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, also the councillors never arrange a public: primary and hustings so the candidates (including themselves) can never be publically scrutinised by the electorate regarding their apparently coordinated omissions both of party political declarations and of manifesto policy declarations :- (see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a comprehensive, mainstream national party politicians’ election fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud both implications & consequences).

53. Long Newton Parish Council (LNPC) has 5 seats, and just 3 candidates stood in 2007, and just 5 in 2011and just 4 in 2015:- moreover in addition to the suspiciously convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at each LNPC Election, also none of them officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none declared a policy manifesto either, moreover the councillors here also omit to run any public primary and hustings each time in order that all of these candidates for local political office can't ever be publically scrutinised regarding all of their apparently coordinated convenient omissions of public declarations regarding both their political parties and their political policies:- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

54. Longborough Parish Council (LPC) has 5 seats and just 4 candidates stood in 2007, and just 5 in 2011, and just 8 in 2015:- moreover in addition to the always neatly convenient nos of candidates in order either to avoid an election contest entirely, or failing that to have somewhat of a negligibly token contest, which is highly suspicious that a criminal cartel is operating each time, yet also none of the candidates officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, also the councillors never arrange a public: primary and hustings so the candidates (including themselves) can never be publically scrutinised by the electorate regarding their apparently coordinated omissions both of party political declarations and of manifesto policy declarations :- (see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a comprehensive, mainstream national party politicians’ election fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud both implications & consequences).

55. Lower Slaughter Parish Council (LSPC) has 5 seats, and just 4 candidates stood in 2007 and just 5 in 2011, and just 4 in 2015:- moreover in addition to the suspiciously convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at each LSPC Election, also none of the candidates officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none of them declared a policy manifesto either, moreover the councillors here always omit to run any public: primary and hustings so that all of the candidates for local political office can't ever be publically scrutinised regarding all of their apparently coordinated convenient omissions of public declarations regarding both their political parties and their political policies:- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

56. Maiseyhampton Parish Council (MPC) has 7 seats, and just 6 candidates stood in and just 7 in 2011, and just 7 in 2015:- moreover in addition to the suspiciously convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at each MPC Election, also none of the candidates officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none of them declared a policy manifesto either, moreover the councillors here also always omit to run any public: primary and hustings so that all of the candidates for local political office can't ever be publically scrutinised regarding all of their apparently coordinated convenient omissions of public declarations regarding both their political parties and their political policies:- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

57. Maugesbury Parish Council (MPC) has 5 seats, and just 5 candidates stood in 2007 and just 6 candidates in 2011,and just 4 in 2015. In addition to the always neatly convenient nos of candidates in order either to avoid an election contest entirely, or failing that to have a negligibly token contest, which is highly suspicious that a criminal cartel is operating each time, yet also none of the candidates officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, also the councillors never arrange a public: primary and hustings so the candidates, including themselves, can never be publically scrutinised by the electorate regarding their apparently coordinated omissions both of party political declarations and of manifesto policy declarations:- (see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a comprehensive, mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated election fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud both implications & consequences).

58. Mickleton Parish Council (MPC) has 11 seats, and just 8 candidates stood in 2007 and just 6 in 2011, and just 9 in 2015:- moreover in addition to the suspiciously convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at each MPC Election, also none of the candidates officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none of them declared a policy manifesto either, moreover the councillors here also always omit to run any public: primary and hustings so that all of the candidates for local political office (including themselves) can't ever be publically scrutinised regarding all of their apparently coordinated convenient omissions of public declarations regarding both their political parties and their political policies:- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences

59. Moreton in the Marsh Town Council: East Ward (MitMEW). This is a newly created ward in 2015 and as yet we don't officially know how many seats it has but it must be 2 or more because we have been officially told that just 2 candidates stood in 2015 and there wasn't any election contest:- moreover in addition to the suspiciously convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest, also neither of the candidates officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none declared a policy manifesto either, moreover the MitM Councillors here also always omit to run any public: primary and hustings so that the candidates for local political office can't ever be publically scrutinised regarding their apparently coordinated convenient omissions of public declarations regarding both their political parties and their political policies:- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

60. Moreton in the Marsh Town Council: West Ward. (MitMWW) This is a newly created ward in 2015 and as yet we don't officially know how many seats it has, but it must be 5 or more, because we have been officially told that just 5 candidates stood in 2015 and there wasn't any election contest:- moreover in addition to the suspiciously convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest, also none of these candidates officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none declared a policy manifesto either, moreover the MitM Councillors here also have always omitted to run any public: primary and hustings so that the candidates for local political office (including themselves) can't ever be publically scrutinised regarding their apparently coordinated convenient omissions of public declarations regarding both their political parties and their political policies:- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

--Moreton in the Marsh Town Council used to have just 1 ward with 11 seats, and just 9 candidates stood in 2007 and then 13 candidates in 2011 and in addition to the suspiciously conveniently few no of candidates on both occasion also none declared either any political parties, and only one candidate (Rod Hooper in 2007) declared that they were independent candidate, moreover as ive noted above the MitM Councillors also have always omitted to run any public: primary and hustings so that the candidates for local political office (including themselves) can't ever be publically scrutinised regarding their apparently coordinated convenient omissions of public declarations regarding both their political parties and their political policies:- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

61 Naunton Parish Council (NPC) has 5 seats, and just 5 candidates in 2007, and just 5 in 2011, and just 3 in 2015:- moreover in addition to the suspiciously convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at each NPC Election, also none of the candidates officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none of them declared a policy manifesto either, moreover the councillors here also always omit to run any public: primary and hustings so that all of the candidates for local political office (including themselves) can't ever be publically scrutinised regarding all of their apparently coordinated convenient omissions of public declarations regarding both their political parties and their political policies:- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences

62 North Cerney Parish Council (NCPC) has 7 seats, and just 7 candidates in 2007 and just 3 in 2011and just 7 in 2015:moreover in addition to the suspiciously convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at each NCPC Election, also none of the candidates officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none of them declared a policy manifesto either, moreover the councillors here also always omit to run any public: primary and hustings so that all of the candidates for local political office (including themselves) can't ever be publically scrutinised regarding all of their apparently coordinated convenient omissions of public declarations regarding both their political parties and their political policies:- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences
-
63. Northleach with Easington Town Council (N&ETC) has 11 seats, and 14 candidates in 2007 and just 9 in 2011, and 10 candidates in 2015. In addition to the always neatly convenient nos of candidates in order either to avoid an election contest entirely, or failing that to have a rather negligibly token contest, which is highly suspicious that one or more criminal cartels are operating each time, yet also none of the candidates officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, (excepting Brian D Hulcup in 2015) , also the councillors never arrange a public: primary and hustings so the candidates (including themselves) can never be publically scrutinised by the electorate regarding their apparently coordinated omissions both of party political declarations and of manifesto policy declarations :- (see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why (excepting possibly Brian Hulcup) these are all evidently mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive elections' frauds, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud both implications & consequences):-

64. Oddington Parish Council (OPC) has 7 seats, and just 7 candidates in 2007, and just 7 in 2011and just 6 in 2015:- moreover in addition to the suspiciously convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at each OPC Election, also none of the candidates officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none of them declared a policy manifesto either, moreover the councillors here also always omit to run any public: primary and hustings so that all of the candidates for local political office (including themselves) can't ever be publically scrutinised regarding all of their apparently coordinated convenient omissions of public declarations regarding both their political parties and their political policies:- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences

65. Poulton Parish Council (PPC) has 5 seats, and just 4 candidates stood in 2007 and just 6 in 2011, and just 5 in 2015:- in addition to the suspiciously convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest in 2 out of these 3 PPC Elections, also none of these candidates officially declared a political party, and while 2 candidates officially declared that they were independent candidates in 2011; Sandy Steel, & Phil Heneghan, yet Phil Heneghan actually was in an undeclared local political party, since he appeared in just one election leaflet and it was with just 4 out of the 5 other candidates, which leaflet just omitted the genuine independent candidate Sandy Steel, who was the only candidate to distribute a policy manifesto at all. Meanwhile which covert local political party's election leaflet appeared to the casual electors' eyes not to be party political at all, unless they also noted that the genuine independent candidate's name and details were entirely omitted, which leaflet also omitted any policy manifesto, regarding these 5 covertly party political candidates. Moreover the PPC councillors have always omitted to run any public: primary and hustings so that all of the candidates for local political office (including themselves) can't be publically scrutinised regarding their apparently coordinated convenient omissions of public declarations regarding both their political parties, and their political policies, also any lies they tell and or write concerning their being independent candidates, while actually operating within this undeclared local political party. This undeclared local political party also stealthily endorses the Conservative Party, as in 2011 the Conservative CDC Candidate; Cabinet Member David Fowles, also personally distributed his own CDC election leaflet, together with this undeclared PPC parties' covertly party political leaflet, hence there was also a stealthy unwritten mutual party political endorsement. The overarching point was covertly concertedly party politically to campaign against the genuine independent candidate, so that this election was comprehensively 'bid rig' cartel defrauded in favour of party politicians' who neither declared their political parties, nor their political parties' policy manifestos to the electors.

Fn. When Sandy Steel complained about this 2011 PPC Comprehensive 'Bid Rigging' Cartel Election Fraud, he never even got a Gloucestershire Police Crime Complaint Receipt, but instead he was put under a trumped up GLOS CID Election Fraud investigation himself, for 6 months concerning his not supplying the name of his election leaflets' printer, and all in order to scare him into stop complaining about the genuine organised election frauds at the PPC & involving the CDC, which CID Officers' abuse of office did scare him, but it also alerted him to the level of comprehensive criminal cartel fraud across the UK's Elections in favour of the Mainstream National Political Parties' Candidates, and the criminal and oligarchic, rather than democratic and lawful intention and how the corporate media and justice authorities covertly condone such organised crimes. Since when Sandy Steel has withheld Council Tax on the principle of: 'No taxation without free, fair and lawful representation" and of course demanded a Jury Trial but instead each year he is secretly tried and convicted by Bench Justices in his unwitting absence, because the Bench Justices concerned clearly know from his pre-case disclosures that the UKs Elections are being comprehensively cartel defrauded, and wish to cover that up, rather than re-establish both lawful elections and lawful trials. What really concerns Sandy Steel is that if all the Queens' Horses and Men can't even address comprehensive criminality in the local elections except by still more frauds, then what frauds of us, do you think they're really up to both nationally and globally, where they're far more liable to cover up, because that is involving the super wealthy and the super powerful more directly?

66. Preston Parish Council (PPC) has 7 seats, and just 5 candidates stood in 2007 and just 6 in 2011, and then 9 in 2015:- in addition to the suspiciously convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at the first 2 PPC Elections, also none of the candidates in any of the elections officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none of them declared a policy manifesto either, moreover the councillors here also always omit to run any public: primary and hustings so that all of the candidates for local political office (including themselves) can't ever be publically scrutinised regarding all of their apparently coordinated convenient omissions of public declarations regarding both their political parties and their political policies, so while its to be applauded that there are 9 candidates at the 2015 election and likely that has something to do with the steady encroachment of Cirencester on Preston, yet even that 2015 local election certainly isn't free, fair or lawful because of the above comprehensive omissions:- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences. What should a community do when its local elections are being comprehensively defrauded?

Fn D. I think Preston should hold a trial of their previous and present so called Councillors, and that every elector acts as Jury regarding framing the Indictment; (I.e that the PPC Elections weren't and aren't free, fair or lawful, that the PPC Councillors past and present are primarily responsible), then the Pleas, Verdict and Sentence, because otherwise you'll have to wait a month of Sundays before anyone from outside comes to tell you home truths about your own community and how its being misled, by its Councillors' comprehensively ommitive & distortive elections' practices, and any outsider will likely also charge you, for what you all already aught to know and doubtless not really get the sentencing right because likely they also require to be retributive, rather than restorative, which is not what communities really need or want, in the face of being collectively continually defraud! What a community needs is a bit of banter until those who are out of line know that the community knows enough, to arraign them, if they don't plea the whole truth in the matter, and then plea to be wholly reconciled, but that's just my opinion - maybe the people of Preston would prefer to continue to be comprehensively cartel defrauded at each election. Maybe they're content with being governed by a covert, absolutist: local, national and global oligarchy?

67. Quenington Parish Council (QPC) has 7 Cllr Seats, and just 7 candidates in 2007 and just 4 in 2011, and just 6 candidates in 2015:-moreover in addition to the suspiciously convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at each QPC Election, also none of them officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none of them declared a policy manifesto either, moreover the councillors here also omit to run any public primary and hustings each time so that these candidates for political office, which include some of the previous councillors and their associates, all can't be publically scrutinised regarding all of their apparently coordinated convenient omissions of public declarations regarding their political parties and their political policies:- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

68. Rendcomb Parish Council (RPC) has 5 Cllr Seats, and just 4 candidates in 2007, and just 5 in 2011,and just 5 candidates in 2015:- moreover in addition to the suspiciously convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at each RPC Election, also none of them officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none of them declared a policy manifesto either, moreover the councillors here also omit to run any public primary and hustings each time so that these candidates for political office, who include some of the councillors and their associates, can't be publically scrutinised regarding all of their apparently coordinated convenient omissions of public declarations regarding their political parties and their political policies :- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

69. Rodmartin Parish Council (RPC) has 7 Cllr Seats, and just 4 candidates in 2007 and just 9 candidates in 2011,and just 5 in 2015:- moreover in addition to the always neatly convenient nos of candidates in order either to avoid an election contest entirely, or failing that to have something of a negligibly token contest, which is highly suspicious that one or more criminal cartels are operating each time, yet also none of the candidates officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, also the councillors never arrange a public: primary and hustings so the candidates (including themselves) can never be publically scrutinised by the electorate regarding their apparently coordinated omissions both of party political declarations and of manifesto policy declarations :- (see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a comprehensive, mainstream national party politicians’ election fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud both implications & consequences).

70. Sapperton Parish Council (SPC) has 7 Cllr Seats, and just 5 candidates in 2007, and just 4 in 2011and just 6 in 2015:- moreover in addition to the suspiciously convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at each RPC Election, also none of them officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none of them declared a policy manifesto either, moreover the councillors here also omit to run any public primary and hustings each time so that these candidates for political office, who include some of the councillors and their associates, can't be publically scrutinised regarding all of their apparently coordinated convenient omissions of public declarations regarding their political parties and their political policies :- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

71. Severnhampton Parish Council (SPC) has 7 Cllr Seats, and just 4 candidates in 2007, and just 6 in 2011, and just 6 in 2015:- moreover in addition to the suspiciously convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at each SPC Election, also none of them officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none of them declared a policy manifesto either, moreover the councillors here also omit to run any public primary and hustings each time so that these candidates for political office, who include some of the councillors and their associates, can't be publically scrutinised regarding all of their apparently coordinated convenient omissions of public declarations regarding their political parties and their political policies :- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

72. Sherborne Parish Council (SPC): has 7 seats, and just 6 candidates stood in 2007 and just 5 in 2011and just 8 in 2015. In addition to the always neatly convenient nos of candidates in order either to avoid an election contest entirely, or failing that to have a negligibly token contest, which is highly suspicious that a criminal cartel is operating each time, yet also none of the candidates officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates (excepting one independent candidate Cecilia Humphrys in 2007, 2011 & 2015 & one lab candidate Laurence Marks in 2015, so excepting L Marks and possibly C Humphrys, there is an evident absence of declared manifesto policies, in addition the councillors never arrange a public: primary and hustings so the candidates (including themselves) can never be publically scrutinised by the electorate regarding their apparently coordinated omissions both of party political declarations and of manifesto policy declarations:- (see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why, excepting LM and maybe but only somewhat CH (as she should have resigned and whistle blown about the evident bid rigging cartel both in 2007 & in 2011 & 2015 rather than hanging on and giving it any implication of being freely fairly or lawfully elected). Otherwise see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently another mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated cartel 'bid rigging' comprehensive elections' fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud both implications & consequences).

73. Shipton Moyne Parish Council (SMPC) has 5 seats, and just 5 candidates stood in 2007, and just 4 in 2011and just 4 in 2015:-moreover in addition to the suspiciously convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at each SMPC Election, also none of them officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none of them declared a policy manifesto either, moreover the councillors here also omit to run any public primary and hustings each time so that these candidates for political office, who include some of the councillors and their associates, can't be publically scrutinised regarding all of their apparently coordinated convenient omissions of public declarations regarding their political parties and their political policies :- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

74. Shipton Oliffe Parish Council (SOPC) has 5 Cllr Seats, and just 4 candidates in 2007 and just 3 in 2011and just 4 in 2015: -moreover in addition to the suspiciously convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at each SOPC Election, also none of them officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none of them declared a policy manifesto either, moreover the councillors here also omit to run any public primary and hustings each time so that these candidates for political office, who include some of the councillors and their associates, can't be publically scrutinised regarding all of their apparently coordinated convenient omissions of public declarations regarding their political parties and their political policies :- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.


75. Siddington Parish Council (SPC) has 11 seats, and just 7 candidates stood in 2007 and just 12 candidates in 2011 and just 9 in 2015:- moreover in addition to the always neatly convenient nos of candidates in order either to avoid an election contest entirely, or failing that to have a negligibly token contest, which is highly suspicious that a criminal cartel is operating each time, yet also none of the candidates officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, also the councillors never arrange a public: primary and hustings so the candidates (including themselves) can never be publically scrutinised by the electorate regarding their apparently coordinated omissions both of party political declarations and of manifesto policy declarations :- (see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a comprehensive, mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated cartel 'bid rigging' comprehensive elections fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud both implications & consequences).

76. Somerford Keynes Parish Council (SKPC) has 7 Cllr Seats, and just 6 candidates in 2007 and just 7 in 2011 and just 8 in 2011. In addition to the always neatly convenient nos of candidates in order either to avoid an election contest entirely, or failing that to have a negligibly token contest, which is highly suspicious that a criminal cartel is operating each time, yet also none of the candidates officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, also the councillors never arrange a public: primary and hustings so the candidates (including themselves) can never be publically scrutinised by the electorate regarding their apparently coordinated omissions both of party political declarations and of manifesto policy declarations :- (see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a comprehensive, mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated cartel 'bid rigging' comprehensive elections fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud both implications & consequences).

77. South Cerney Parish Councils: Rural Ward (SCPCRW) was created in 2015 and we're not yet official told how many seats it has, but we are told that just 1 candidate stood in 2015, so there was no election contest:-

78. South Cerney Parish Council: Village Ward (SCPCVW) has we're not yet officially told how many seats but just 5 candidates stood in 2015, so there was no election contest:-

--- South Cerney Parish Council (CSPC). Before 2015 CSPC used to have 1 ward with 11 seats, and just 12 candidates stood in 2007 and just 10 in 2011, then it was split into two wards in 2015 (see above)

79. Southrop Parish Council (SPC) has 5 Cllr Seats, and just 5 candidates in 2007 and just 5 in 2011and just 5 in 2015:- moreover in addition to the suspiciously convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at each SPC Election, also none of them officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none of them declared a policy manifesto either, moreover the councillors here also omit to run any public primary and hustings each time so that these candidates for political office, who include some of the councillors and their associates, can't be publically scrutinised regarding all of their apparently coordinated convenient omissions of public declarations regarding their political parties and their political policies :- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

80 . Stow on the Wold Town Council:(SotWTC) has 11 Cllr Seats, and just 10 candidates in 2007:- 2 indi, and just 11 in 2011, and just 13 in 2015, 1 Independent Susan M Green

81. Swell Parish Council (SPC) has 7 Cllr Seats, and just 6 candidates in 2007 and just 4 in 2011and just 5 in 2015:- moreover in addition to the suspiciously convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at each SPC Election, also none of them officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none of them declared a policy manifesto either, moreover the councillors here also omit to run any public primary and hustings each time so that these candidates for political office, who include some of the councillors and their associates, can't be publically scrutinised regarding all of their apparently coordinated convenient omissions of public declarations regarding their political parties and their political policies :- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

82. Temple Guiting Parish Council (TGPC) has 7 Cllr Seats, and just 5 candidates in 2007 and just 6 in 2011 and just 6 in 2015:- moreover in addition to the suspiciously convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at each TGPC Election, also none of them officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none of them declared a policy manifesto either, moreover the councillors here also omit to run any public primary and hustings each time so that these candidates for political office, who include some of the councillors and their associates, can't be publically scrutinised regarding all of their apparently coordinated convenient omissions of public declarations regarding their political parties and their political policies :- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

83. Tetbury Upton Parish Council (TUPC) has 5 Cllr Seats, and just 4 candidates in 2007 and just 5 in 2011and just 5 in 2015:-moreover in addition to the suspiciously convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at each TUPC Election, also none of them officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none of them declared a policy manifesto either, moreover the councillors here also omit to run any public primary and hustings each time so that these candidates for political office, who include some of the councillors and their associates, can't be publically scrutinised regarding all of their apparently coordinated convenient omissions of public declarations regarding their political parties and their political policies :- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.

84. Tetbury Town Council, Town Ward (TTCTW) has ? Cllr Seats, and just 5 candidates in 2015 (2 independents, 1 conservatives):-

85. Tetbury Town Council's East Ward (TTCEW) is new in 2015 and we're not as yet officially told how many seats it has, but we do know that it must be 3 or more seats, as just 3 candidates stood in 2015 and there was no election contest, (1 Con Stephen Hurst) in:-

86. Tetbury Town Council West Ward (TTCWW) has ? seats, and just 4 candidates stood in 2015 including 1 Lab & 1 Con:-

-- Tetbury Town Council. Until 2015 TTC had just 1 ward with 15 seats, and just 15 candidates stood in 2007, and just 16 in 2011.

87. Todenham Parish Council (TPC) has 7 seats, and just 6 candidates stood in 2007 and just 7 in 2011and 4 in 2015:- moreover in addition to the suspiciously convenient nos of candidates in order to avoid an election contest at each RPC Election, also none of them officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, therefore none of them declared a policy manifesto either, moreover the councillors here also omit to run any public primary and hustings each time so that these candidates for political office, who include some of the councillors and their associates, can't be publically scrutinised regarding all of their apparently coordinated convenient omissions of public declarations regarding their political parties and their political policies :- see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated comprehensive election ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud: implications and consequences.


88. Upper Rissington Parish Council (URPC) has 7 seats, and just 5 candidates stood in 2007 and just 4 in 2011and just 4 in 2015. In addition to the always neatly convenient nos of candidates in order either to avoid an election contest entirely, or failing that to have a negligibly token contest, which is highly suspicious that a criminal cartel is operating each time, yet also none of the candidates officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates excepting independent candidate Caroline Maclean in 2015, also the councillors never arrange a public: primary and hustings so the candidates (including themselves) can never be publically scrutinised by the electorate regarding their apparently coordinated omissions both of party political declarations and of manifesto policy declarations :- (see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why (with the possible exception of Carline Maclean that this is evidently a comprehensive, mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated cartel 'bid rigging' comprehensive elections fraud, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud both implications & consequences). If she's a genuine independent, then I advise carline maclean to resign and to whistleblow as otherwise she become a party in this party political cartel's elections 'bid rigging' frauds.

89. Upper Slaughter Parish Council (USPC) has 5 seats, and just 2 candidates stood in 2007 and just 6 in 2011and just 5 in 2015. In addition to the always neatly convenient nos of candidates in order either to avoid an election contest entirely, or failing that to have a negligibly token contest, which is highly suspicious that a criminal cartel is operating at each USPC Election, yet also none of the candidates officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, also the councillors never arrange a public: primary and hustings so the candidates (including themselves) can never be publically scrutinised by the electorate regarding their apparently coordinated omissions both of party political declarations and of manifesto policy declarations :- (see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a comprehensive, mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated cartel 'bid rigging' comprehensive elections fraud of the USPC Elections, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud both implications & consequences).

90. Westonbirt and Lasborough Parish Council (W&LPC) has seats, and just 5 candidates stood in 2007 and just 5 in 2011 and just 5 in 2015. In addition to the always neatly convenient nos of candidates in order either to avoid an election contest entirely, which is highly suspicious that a criminal cartel is operating at each W/LPC Election, yet also none of the candidates officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, also the councillors never arrange a public: primary and hustings so the candidates (including themselves) can never be publically scrutinised by the electorate regarding their apparently coordinated omissions both of party political declarations and of manifesto policy declarations :- (see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a comprehensive, mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated cartel 'bid rigging' comprehensive elections fraud of the W/CPC Elections, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud both implications & consequences).

91. Weston-Sub-Edge Parish Council (W-S-EPC) has 7 seats, and just 7 candidates stood in 2007 and just 7 in 2011 and just 6 in 2015. In addition to the always neatly convenient nos of candidates in order either to avoid an election contest entirely, which is highly suspicious that a criminal cartel is operating at each W-S-EPC Election, yet also none of the candidates officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, also the councillors never arrange a public: primary and hustings so the candidates (including themselves) can never be publically scrutinised by the electorate regarding their apparently coordinated omissions both of party political declarations and of manifesto policy declarations :- (see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a comprehensive, mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated cartel 'bid rigging' comprehensive elections fraud of the W-S-EPC Elections, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud both implications & consequences).

92. Willersy Parish Council (WPC) has 9 seats, and just 7 candidates stood in 2007 and just 5 in 2011 and just 4 in 2015. In addition to the always neatly convenient nos of candidates in order either to avoid an election contest entirely, which is highly suspicious that a criminal cartel is operating at each WPC Election, yet also none of the candidates officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, also the councillors never arrange a public: primary and hustings so the candidates (including themselves) can never be publically scrutinised by the electorate regarding their apparently coordinated omissions both of party political declarations and of manifesto policy declarations :- (see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a comprehensive, mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated cartel 'bid rigging' comprehensive elections fraud of the WPC Elections, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud both implications & consequences).

93. Winstone Parish Council (WPC) has 5 seats, and just 6 candidates stood in 2007 and just 5 in 2011 and just 5 in 2015. In addition to the always neatly convenient nos of candidates in order either to avoid an election contest entirely, or failing that to have a negligibly token contest, which is highly suspicious that a criminal cartel is operating at each WPC Election, yet also none of the candidates officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, also the councillors never arrange a public: primary and hustings so the candidates (including themselves) can never be publically scrutinised by the electorate regarding their apparently coordinated omissions both of party political declarations and of manifesto policy declarations :- (see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a comprehensive, mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated cartel 'bid rigging' comprehensive elections fraud of the WPC Elections, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud both implications & consequences).

94. Withington Parish Council (WPC) has 7 seats, and just 7 candidates stood in 2007 and just 6 in 2011 and just 6 in 2015. In addition to the always neatly convenient nos of candidates in order either to avoid an election contest entirely, which is highly suspicious that a criminal cartel is operating at each WPC Election, yet also none of the candidates officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, also the councillors never arrange a public: primary and hustings so the candidates (including themselves) can never be publically scrutinised by the electorate regarding their apparently coordinated omissions both of party political declarations and of manifesto policy declarations :- (see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a comprehensive, mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated cartel 'bid rigging' comprehensive elections fraud of the WPC Elections, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud both implications & consequences).

95. Wyck Rissington Parish Council (WRPC) has 5 seats, and just 4 candidates stood in 2007 and just 5 in 2011 and just 5 in 2015 .In addition to the always neatly convenient nos of candidates in order either to avoid an election contest entirely, or failing that to have a negligibly token contest, which is highly suspicious that a criminal cartel is operating at each WRPC Election, yet also none of the candidates officially declared either any political party, nor yet that they were independent candidates, also the councillors never arrange a public: primary and hustings so the candidates (including themselves) can never be publically scrutinised by the electorate regarding their apparently coordinated omissions both of party political declarations and of manifesto policy declarations :- (see Aldsworth’s Fn B (above) for why this is evidently a comprehensive, mainstream national party politicians’ coordinated cartel 'bid rigging' comprehensive elections fraud of the WRPC Elections, and some of the National also Global Corporate fraud both implications & consequences).


(Nb Every one of these 95 Wards Elections 200/2011/2015 are clearly comprehensively cartel 'bid rig' defrauded, but each entry to be rechecked later when I have time, and apologies for any inaccuracies to-date, but I'm not being paid to tell you about your local communities defrauded elections, and your welcome to call me to correct me on: 01285-850590 ).

Evidently the very idea of their declaring anything to their electorate at election time is completely anathema to these councils, including that they’ve clearly coordinated their own number to avoid any election contest each time or to have negligible contest each time, yet then these type of candidates allege that the electors are apathetic when in fact these candidates have all covertly coordinated in order to give their electors in most cases neither electoral choices at all, nor any political undertakings at all, so of course they are all co-ordinately misleading the electors by pulling the wool, so that the whole of each candidate’s manifesto agenda is obscured from public view.

This is clearly a mainstream national party politicians’ arranged ‘bid rigging’ cartel fraud of each local election, because since the local candidates have covertly coordinated in order to declare little or nothing to their electors and therefore have lttle or no policy manifesto mandate, so the more senior party politicians in the area can do what they like, and since the latter are all literally in the pockets of their own national party’s elites on policy, so we’re all slaved via a comprehensive fraud of the local elections to a national and global corporate oligarchy’s agenda, and as we know they don’t declare proper manifestos at the national level either.

So because they’ve comprehensively defrauded the elections from the bottom up, so the whole political edifice via these comprehensive electoral frauds, is covertly biased to oligarchy and tyranny and away from democracy and personal autonomy.

By contrast what should happen locally is if the candidates are national party political supporters they should tell the electors that, together with a local manifesto. If on the other hand they are genuine independent candidates then they’ve got to sit down and write a policy manifesto, showing what distinguishes them to be independent of the Mainstream National Party Politicians on policy, for the ward.

Moreover every local candidate in order not to defraud, has to burn the midnight oil and actually think what would be best for their ward and publically declare it, before the nominations close, rather than behaving like Judas Sheep and just bleating vote for us willy-nilly that none of us have declared any policy manifestos for the local area, which is what they are currently doing, & in a covertly party politically coordinated manner!

Just think, about the dynamic of Global v National v Local v Personal political control: for just one example; UK Education currently is organised nationally, with a ‘one size fits all’ childrens’ National Curriculum till aged 13, but particularly with modern technology every parent and child aught to be able to pick and choose their own curriculum via multi-media videos down-loaded off the internet, and of course together with a complementary testing system after each video, to establish at what level each child is, in each subject, after every lesson, which means the children can study wherever and whenever the parents like, and of course local parents could then run a ‘free school’ virtually for free and on a rota basis, with the specialised or professional information freely available online.

So Education should be as easy to pick and choose, as fruit and veg is, but it currently isn’t readily publically available like that, because the Party Politicians together with the Institutional Teachers are operating a universal ‘price fixing’ and ‘supply fixing’ cartel regarding our children’s educations and which is so that they can both profitise from us, to the tune of £95 billion p.a. and control our minds from aged 5 on.

Moreover if you start to examine the national and global corporates be they publicly or privately owned and controlled, you will find an extraordinary network of such cartel frauds and extortions, in almost every national and global market, because their only agenda is to maximise profit & power from us, and for themselves, which principle is okay in any genuinely democratically regulated free market.

However the national and global markets in most cases aren’t free markets at all but they have been stealthy systemically rigged since at least before WW1 with the mainstream national party politicians covertly being in these public and private national and global corporates’ pockets.

The Banking, the Energy, the Arms Markets & Education Markets being markets where the most enormous both frauds and extortions, also both maimings and murders of ordinary people have been arranged for decades, simply because The People haven’t insisted that their local elections should be freely, fairly and lawful conducted and that their justice system should be freely, fairly and lawful conducted too.

There is a word for this type of government it's called a Kakistocracy: that is a government under the control of a nation's worst and or least qualified citizens: Tjeerd Andringa Exposes the Kakistocracy (33 minutes of audio):- www.corbettreport.com/interview-1024-tjeerd-andringa-exposes-the-kakistocracy/ "Kakistocracy is defined as “rule by the worst.” Today on the program Dr. Tjeerd Andringa of the University of Groningen joins us to discuss his theory of how the kakistocracy uses child abuse to perpetuate their control, both over the victims of that abuse and its perpetrators. We also discuss what the vast majority of decent and moral people can do about this problem."

In other words, since the people of these 95 wards so far haven’t even coherently objected to this organise covert comprehensive robbing of their local councils’ autonomy by national and global corporations then it will surely continue. Moreover, it is also theorised (link above), that those who are attracted to such a comprehensive political cartel abuse, could be more liable to be the type who are attracted to child abuse rings too, as the psychopathy is rather similar.

Moreover if the people of these 95 Wards aren't as yet mature enough to congregate and to articulate an indictment both of their local councillors (see Preston in the list above, for a suggestion of how) and of their councillors' local national party politician controllers regarding their national party political organised crimes regarding their town and parish council's elections, then why would the police or anyone else get involved? So the parallels and connection between political ring abusers and paedophile ring abusers is apparent once one considers them.

Once people realise the level of comprehensive party political cartel fraud which is being practiced on them right under their own noses by all of their local Councillors either directly or as accessories in this cartel, then people aught to start wondering what level of criminal conspiratorial abuse is occurring regarding the district council, the county council, also nationally politically, and European politically also globally politically as I really started wondering only beck in 2011? Where do the branches of this criminal oligarchy really reach whose roots are firmly in the local community - could not this Kakistocratic oligarchy be behind a lot of the perennial: district, county, national and global abuses we see?

For example have you ever also noticed that the national political parties' memberships are secret, which therefore makes it easy for them to run 'bid rigging' cartels, so the political parties are all acting very like masonry does, and yet they are governing this country - is that right either? It seems a veritable witches brew recipe, for serious organised fraud.

By comparison; when children are sexually abused in many cases they simply let it happen, because its secretively done, so they don't feel articulate enough, or strong enough successfully to resist, so how long are the people of these 95 Wards going to continue to let comprehensive local political fraud to happen to them, and likely far worse fraud as this oligarchy gets ever higher and more powerful, before they choose articulately and or physically to resist their local political abusers also their party political controllers?

Isn't it time to clean up your local politics where this Kakistocracy has its organised crime roots, and put in place a free fair and lawful local election process instead, where the local candidates must articulate a manifesto, whether they are either party political or genuine independents, also where they must all go though a proper public primary process, so they really are all able to be publically scrutinised both for covert political rings and for the terms and conditions under which they are being elected, and of course the elections aught to be annual rather than perennial.

Surely when anyone puts their hand up to govern other people, they should of course already have a very clear plan of what they intend to try to achieve or move forward while in office, and isn't it reasonable that the electors should know that manifesto plan therefore that candidate with their plan in writing needs to be sitting in the village or town hall, for at least three evenings during a primary stage, so the electors can really scrutinise what they are likely to get, then a public meeting follows where their manifesto's plans or lack of plans which omission maybe because they wish to hide their party/partial interest, can be publically questioned.

Once people in these 95 Wards make an accurate public indictment of the present comprehensive local electoral wrongdoings by their councillors et al (see fn 7), then a more accurate assessment of what is locally electorally right to do, will be likely to develop, at which point the wicked national and global corporate 'modernity spell' maybe broken, and a greater local council, and personal autonomy, maybe obtained back from these criminally abusive absolutist national and global corporate oligarchies.
......
Fn1:- check out all 102 of the Cotswold District's/Constituency's Town & Parish Councils’ Election Results directly at: “Cotswold District Election Results” at: www.cotswold.gov.uk/about-the-council/elections/election-results/ click; “Parish Council Elections”; as these 95 Local Elections’ results are the evidential 'smoking gun' regarding the mainstream national party politicians’ comprehensive elections frauds. If you read ‘The 6 Reform Articles’; (see Fn.7) that’s where we enumerate all 6 comprehensive frauds, so then together with this results’ link (above) you can then note that either 5 or all 6 comprehensive election frauds are used in everyone of this District's/Constituency's 102 Local Election. In other words regarding framing criminal indictments the evidence is in plain view, at this link - once you read The 6 Reform Articles (below) so that you know what you're looking for.

Fn2. until a week ago this local elections results link (above) was suppressed, for the obvious reason, that if you examine it, then every result reveals compelling evidence that each local election is comprehensively party politician defrauded:- they mostly use ‘The 6 Reform Articles’ (see Fn.7) fraud 1; as more fully described in fraud 3; Fne; and or fraud 6 - with the 4 further comprehensive frauds, enhancing these first 2; (it was a Cotswold Chartist campaign that restored this results link to visibility last week, it having been repeatedly suppressed, since we first drew attention to it, in 2012).

Fn3. our brief video on comprehensive election fraud is at: www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSCU0GPqD8Y (8 minutes)

Fn4. check out 28 generic frauds & extortions run on you all, by the corporate oligarchies: www.sandysteel.co.uk then click: ‘UK/Global Frauds’. Particularly scroll to the 6 ‘Energy Frauds’ links, as energy underpins the entire economy:- so then you’ll see how the Global economy is totally defrauded by an oligarchy, and what we could easily combine & do about it.

Fn5. photographing your own completed Ballot Papers as evidence of how you voted is lawful! Recording this evidence is important, since it may become critical to have this evidence of how you really voted, in order to expose these election fraudsters’ comprehensive frauds. Even more so, since they’re now also well up for a comprehensive ballot count defraud, particularly regarding the postal ballots. So don’t let Polling Officers intimidate you into not carefully photographing your own ballot papers, by telling you anything different. Today’s Polling Staff are controlled by the criminal Mainstream National Party Politicians, and these staff are so conditioned that they never stop & ask themselves would a Jury condone this or that practice or condemn it, as fraud, which is what really determines ‘The Law’ in the UK, and not the Party Politicians’ statutory instruments, nor bureaucrats’ orders, nor anything else. But if you read about the UK Bench Justices’ 2 generic treasonous frauds, (below) you’ll get why, this conditioning can occur)

Fn 6:- about the forthcoming already comprehensive fraud Elections; 7th May 2015. Because of the successful, comprehensive frauds here, both in 2007 & in 2011 and already in 2015, so the chances of a free & fair, lawful election on the 7th May 2015 are nil, which is why you should all:-
• not vote for any of the printed candidates till the 6 comprehensive frauds regarding the present UK Elections, which are all enumerated below, are properly redressed,
• instead write boldly on each Ballot Paper that you are voting for yourself, and carefully photo each one, before putting it in the ballot box, as evidence; which photos are lawful to do!
• contact each other, to coordinate further lawful actions, in order to create a genuinely democratic, lawful Parish and Town Council, local government.

Otherwise you’ll all continue stealthily, comprehensively to be fleeced and or slaughtered like the sheeple you currently really are, and it's run by a coalition of national and global corporations which oligarchies only interest is to maximise profit from you all, and be that by commercial profiteering, or else by war profiteering:– whichever one makes them the most profit, so you the most losses – they’ll promote that. As you can see from the above, the National Party Politicians’ Corporates are comprehensively sneaky about how they go about this, and they have a bevy of local quislings, covertly to do all their local dirty work for them, and no questions asked!

Fn 7.our Reforms Articles concerning 6 comprehensive frauds of these 102 wards' elections & elections generally:-

1. Annual Public:- Primaries, Hustings and Elections for every MP also Cllr. In addition that on every Ballot Paper there is the option for The Elector not to sign away their political power to anyone else, but to retain their political power themselves:-

Fna; UK MPs and Councillors don’t run Public: Primaries and Hustings, which is in order that their own elective posts aren’t properly publically advertised, which fraud by not properly advertising their own posts, enables the majority of UK Local Councillors and their privately invited either party associates or personal mates stealthily, repeatedly to be Elected Automatically, without any Election Contests at all, or elected with a token contest; as they collectively impeded all other candidates even to stand and if they do, to have a free and fair contest. By contrast any proper public primary enables the candidates to be publicly scrutinised, and before the Nominations Stage ends and both for stealthy rings, and for poor manifestos; Fnb; the original Chartists and Tom Payne demanded annual elections. The reason why the Party and Local Politicians never implemented this, either, is that they like to use their perennial unaccountability comprehensively to defraud the electorate. Fnc: The UK’s Party Politician MPs & Cllrs compose each Ballot Paper in such a way that each Elector can only sign away their political power to others, not retain it for themselves, which formal, legal fallacy comprehensively defrauds: power, information & money towards the Party Politicians’ and to their Party Elites, also to their usually stealthy, wealthy backers. By contrast local, national and global politics could all be conducted by a qualified, or an absolute Direct Democracy, as ancient Athens had and some modern Swiss Cities have; therefore on each Ballot Paper each elector aught to have the option to retain their political powers for themselves, therefore voting for some form of Direct Democracy in that Council or Parliament; (see a Direct Democracy reform, recommended in Article No 4 below).

2. No MP or Councillor to sit in any Parliament or Council for over 1 year.

Fn; if we restrict the total term in office in every Parliament and every Council to one year, then the power has to be shared out, which is what a genuine democracy is about.

By contrast today’s MPs and Cllrs cling on to power, for as long as possible, and now often for a life time - which is government by a parasitic clique, so not remotely a government by the people:- hence via such careerism, they also comprehensively defraud any genuine democracy.

3. All MP & Cllr candidates to publish their own manifestos, rather than what occurs nowadays, which is the comprehensive bribery both of Party Politicians and their Small Town and Rural Parish Councillor Quislings, regarding policy matters; (the latter being bribed often simply by being given petty but arbitrary power).

Fnd; currently National Party Politicians never publish their own manifestos, as they give up their own right and their constituents’ rights to decide policies to their Party Elite, in return for being promoted by that Party Elite, firstly with advertising money at their election, then with paid, public posts, which is a policy bribery system. By contrast every MP and Cllr candidate should write their own manifesto and never be bribed on any policy matter, or any public matter. Fne. Also Rural Parish and Small Town Local Election Candidates and incumbent Councillors are covertly told by their Party Politician controllers neither to declare their party, nor a manifesto, nor to run a public: primary and hustings, all which is another comprehensive policy defraud and election defraud system, but this one is tailored in order covertly comprehensively to defraud the UK's Rural Elections both in these Mainstream National Party Politicians' favour, who hold the more senior rural public posts and in favour of their covert quislings on Small Town and Rural Parish Councils; (see No 6 for the Mainstream National Party Politicians’ comprehensive fraud of the UK’s Urban Elections).

4. A two chambered ‘Bicameral System’ in each Parliament and each Council, where one Chamber is either the whole electorate if that is practicable, or otherwise selected on a random, rota basis like a Jury is, while the other Chamber is elected. Furthermore all from aged 8 onwards, are included in the Jury Chambers, & who have the vote there.


Fnf; This bicameralism; (a two chambered political system), ensures that every group in society is proportionately politically represented, not just the wealthy; so the Party Politicians' present comprehensive fraud of democracy, where they claim that their Elective Representative Councils and Parliaments are democratic places, when every underprivileged group in UK society, still has no direct representation in any of these places what so ever, is finally thoroughly addressed. Fng; Public Institutional & Public Elites’ Personal Child Abuse is Universal today, where the already comprehensively criminal State Elite institutionally abuses our children in plain view, with their 'one size fits all' and now neuro-linguistic programming Universal Curriculum, and more covertly by their condoned and or sponsored pederasty rings among Party Politicians & other Public Elites, which are in order covertly publically to control both by an elitist blackmailing system, and by a child abuse system, including by its threat to the general population, via the same elites’ secret Family Courts’ System seizing children. By contrast this measure intends to help restore children to the control of their parents, their local communities, and common law.

5. MPs not to be paid more than the minimum wage, plus out of pocket expenses, also Cllrs not to take other than out of pocket expenses.

Fn; To be a democratic MP or Cllr should be a temporary, vocational honour; so not for profit. Their expenses should be such so that no-one through poverty is denied the chance to serve. If we remove the MPs and Cllrs' excessive time in Office, and their excessive public incomes for Office, then the party political elite's present continuous offer of excessive public incomes in order comprehensively to bribe the MPs & Cllrs, on policy matters, is greatly reduced. It also means that the middle and low incomed will be able, to be directly represented in all UK elective chambers, so the present comprehensive democratic defraud of the middle and low incomed, also of low capitaled groups, in our society by the UK's senior Cllrs and MPs, will be able to be tackled.

6. All UK so called 'Local Elections' to be truly local, rather than stealthily super-duper sized, which is another Mainstream National Party Politicians' Comprehensive Elections Fraud System, used to defraud every UK large town and city election, in their favour.

Fn; Currently all of the UK’s larger towns and cities' so called 'Local Elections' have been stealthily super-duper sized by 10 to 100 fold compared with the rural local elections, which typically contain less than three hundred electors, while the former typically contain from three thousand to fifteen thousand electors, which super-duper sizing is entirely in order that the UK's larger towns & cities' electors now can't know their 'local candidates', which coerces these electors to vote for the Mainstream National Parties' Candidates at all of these still so called 'local elections':- and this comprehensive 'entry gate' elections' fraud system, in turn then benefits and protects all of the UK's Larger Towns and Cities' more senior Mainstream National Party Politicians as well, so this is a comprehensive fraud of the UK's Larger Towns' & Cities' Elections! By contrast every UK Local Council aught to have wards of under 100 hundred electors, and these wards subdivided again to as little as 10 electors per returned Cllr, so that the electors are all likely to know all of their local Cllr candidates, and vice versa, because then it becomes much harder for any local Cllrs to become engaged in any party frauds, still less in any National Party Politicians' comprehensive frauds of the UK's electors, which is what does happen in UK politics today.

3rd April 2015.

The Parish Councils’ Wards and Town Councils’ small and medium Wards’ Chartists:’ contact ------/-------- on facebook or T:-----/------- between ---- & ----

Cotswold Constituency Coordinator: Sandy Steel; T: 01285-850590 Ans Mach; [e-mail] ; www.sandysteel.co.uk or on facebook -

...

[Avast! Behind]

Dear Sandy - it's time you took a break from all this - I certainly admire the effort you've put in and like you am outraged by the injustice - so, come back refreshed and get stuck in again. Mrs Mirabelle Artichoke Sugar Hardboiled M.A.S.H 4077

[Avast! Behind]

Dear Sandy - it's time you took a break from all this - I certainly admire the effort you've put in and like you am outraged by the injustice - so, come back refreshed and get stuck in again. Mrs Mirabelle Artichoke Sugar Hardboiled M.A.S.H 4077

[Admin]

thanks for your M.A.S.H. up msg,

Today I tried to link this 102 Wards' Elections Fraud Indictment to the Electoral Commission CEO (Peter Wardle) but the Commission's senior duty Information Officer (Mark Nyack) denied all responsibility for the Commission to do anything about the fraud of elections, so they intend not even to record this elections fraud indictment, but eventually I got the CEO's secretary's email from him, so I will try that, but I'm sure the CEO is as criminal as the rest, as I've experienced him and his sexecutive director colleague (Andrew Scallon) before.

I tried to send this fraud indictment's link to Action Fraud too because two staff at the GLOS Police Call Centre insisted that this is the polices' central fraud agency now, to which I must refer, and these staff also said that the GLOS Police now don't do fraud! Then this Action Fraud agency staff denied responsibility to do anything regarding any elections fraud indictment either!

I have successfully linked this election fraud indictment to the Returning Officer and to the Cotswold District Council CEO, but who both have a record of several years of elections' fraud formal complaints and questions' suppressions, so we'll see on monday if they reply at all, and if so what level of denial of responsibility they'll put in place!.

The GLOS Police at my 3nd attempt have now acknowledged this fraud indictment link to them by email, as you can see below, albeit anonymously, so we will see if their 'intelligence dep't' is just another exercise in public bs, as I suspect it will be, all of which is/will be abuses of public office.

The more senior in UK public life today, the less spine they've got - just slime. Give me just one uniformed, honest constable, but has Suzette Davenport got sufficient spine even to put one honest constable on these over 600 Criminal Cartel Councillors' track in the Cotswold Constituency, (The Slime Brigade) - so will she honour her oath to uphold the law, without fear or favour - the previous CC didn't. We have yet to see what stuff this one is made of, and whether she and her officers' both high and low ranking, like being the servants of cartel criminal national party politicians, or not?

Sandy



Hi James


Noted your email that you sent below


It has been sent on to our Intelligence department



Regards



Force Control Room

Contact Management Department

Gloucestershire Constabulary

( 101

8 www.gloucestershire.police.uk

Twitter page

Facebook page