Stow Chartists: Election & Jurisdiction Frauds - Forum.

[Admin]

Stow-on-the-Wold Chartists

6 comprehensive frauds of their own elections conducted by The Stow Town Council’s 11 Councillors, and by their local, senior Party Politician controllers

At The Stow Town Council Election 2007 there were 11 seats, and 10 candidates:- so the candidates were all automatically elected without an election contest, and which occurred because of a comprehensive fraud involving all 10 candidates, and run by their covert more senior local, National Party Politician controllers.

Firstly they stealthily failed properly publically to advertise these 11 elective posts by omitting to run a public: primary and hustings:- in addition they omitted to declare their parties and policies, and lastly they neatly arranged their own number to avoid an election contest amongst themselves.

Ask yourself this:- with 1,686 electors, how could the number of candidates be so neat as just to avoid an election contest, unless that had been covertly deliberately arranged to be so? That none of the 10 candidates officially declared a political party, shows that this election was defrauded by an undeclared political party containing the 10 neatly arranged number of candidates, which was in order to avoid any contest, and all in order to prevent The 1686 electors, having any local election choice at all.

This election cartel’s ‘bid rigging’ crime would have been secretly arranged by local National Party Political leaders, who coordinated who would stand, to prevent an election contest, and indicated to them, not to declare their political parties and political policies, nor to give the public the opportunity publically to investigate them all, by also omitting to run a public: primary and hustings, as this would likely give the game away to the electorate that their local election was being comprehensively defrauded by way of National Political Parties covertly acting together, comprehensively to defraud this local election in their candidates’ favour, which electorate would then likely put up some real, independent candidates, and then a free and fair, lawful election would occur.

Just to backtrack about the 2 declared “independent” candidates, among this 10 candidate criminal cartel. While none of the 10 candidates declared a political party, although actually they were all clearly coordinated in number to avoid an election contest, yet two did formally declare on their nomination papers that they were “independent” candidates (Robin HS Jones, & John Kennell). While these, and possible one or two others may have been genuinely independent candidates to start with, as soon as they saw the nominations published and realised the neatly arranged candidate number of 10 in order to avoid an election contest, also that none had declared a political party they would have then known that there was a criminal cartel ‘bid rig’ defrauding the election, at which point the correct action would have been to resign and whistle-blow, but they didn’t:- so the independents at that moment became accessories in this party political cartel’s election bid rigging fraud, and also beneficiaries of it, and therefore parties in it.

Just to backtrack a bit further:- the incumbent councillors amongst these 10 candidates, by their not running a public: primary and hustings never properly publically advertised their own elective posts, which was in order that they and their political mates, and or their personal mates, therefore were likely to be re-elected/elected either with a token contest, or as here automatically with no contest at all.

...

All of the above is just 1 comprehensive election fraud among 6 comprehensive election frauds used by Stow’s 11 Town Councillors together with their covert senior, local Mainstream, National Party Politician Controllers, in order that your/their elections are constantly, entirely defrauded.

Moreover this criminal cartel’s 6 comprehensive local election frauds (see Fn 7) of which I've so far only explained 1, are all used to defraud not just this local election, but the UK's local elections comprehensively, which in turn defrauds all of the larger UK elections in the same national political parties’ favour as well, as they have comprehensively impeded everyone else except from their own mainstream national political parties even to start in local politics, via these 6 generic, comprehensive local elections' frauds; (see Fn7).

Since their 6 comprehensive election frauds are generic to UK local elections, so I’ll leave off explaining the remaining 5 here, and just enumerate all 6 in ‘The 6 Reform Articles’ below so that I don’t have to repeat myself:-

So if you do want to understand how comprehensively you are being election defrauded and by all your Cllrs and by all UK MPs in modern times, also by all MEPS, then read till the end, then maybe follow the link, re 28 ways that we're all being generally defrauded by the UK's comprehensively criminal mainstream national party politicians' oligarchy, and by their associated national and global corporatist oligarchies, including most extremely, comprehensively, by both the global energy oligarchy and the global militarists-industrialists oligarchy, also all capped by the global bankers oligarchy.

By contrast, any free, fair, lawful election would occur on the basis of each candidate having both to declare their candidacy, and to supply a manifesto, also at the public primary stage; that is correctly at a public primary meeting before the nominations close, in order to ensure the electorate is given a free and fair, lawful election, which of course it wasn’t given here, at all.

At The Stow Town Council Election 2011 there were 11 candidates, and 11 seats, and again none of them declared a political party, but this time 3 declared themselves to be “independent” candidates on their nomination papers: Robin HS Jones, John M Kennell, Roger G George.

So what really happened in 2011 was that the undeclared political party of 10 Stow Town Councillors, who had comprehensively, cartel ‘bid rig’ defrauded their own 2007 Local Election, then helped to coordinate a similar successful comprehensive cartel ‘bid rig’ fraud of the 2011 Stow Town Council Election too. So Stowe’s ,1741 Electors certainly didn’t get a free and fair, lawful Town, (or District or General Election) in 2011 either, as once again they had all been covertly wholly successfully Party Politically cartel ‘bid rig’ defrauded, from this local 'entry gate' election, on up, where honest people couldn’t possibly even get started, without having to resign and whistlelow.

Just to back track:- regarding the 3 alleged ‘independent’ candidates' part in this comprehensive cartel fraud of The Stow Council Election; 2011. Regardless of whether some of the 11 candidates may not have been aware of the cartel’s intended election fraud ‘before the fact’ either in 2007 or in 2011, then certainly in both cases all 11 Stow Town Council candidates must have become aware of this cartel’s election fraud after the fact, and since none of the neatly arranged 10 then 11 candidates either in 2007 or in 2011 then did resign and report this cartel's comprehensive ‘bid rigging’ election fraud, so all 10 then 11 in both cases, then became parties in these 2 comprehensive election cartel crimes; 2007 & 2011. That’s if they weren’t all really parties in on this election cartel's fraud plan before the fact, and so some or all of the alleged independents simply were using their formally declared alleged “independent” status as a further means to defraud the electors. Either way that was the outcome!

.....

The same either ‘before the fact’ or ‘after the fact’ cartel crime involvement question applies to all of the dominant national parties’ politicians in the area; I.e. all the areas' Cons & LDs, also the question applies to all of the other national parties' members in the area. Since just a glance at the Stow Town Council’s Election Results; (2007 & 2011) does reveal compelling evidence that these elections were comprehensively cartel defrauded by an undeclared political party involving all 10 & 11 candidates respectively, so why didn’t any of the local mainstream, national party politicians whistle-blow about these 2 blatant organised local election cartel crimes?

The only plausible answer is that they all are not only involved, but they actually instigate this comprehensive local election fraud system, because it means that they are then able both wholly to hide their mainstream, national parties’ political block on the Stow Town Council and therefore covertly help to ensure that all 11 councillors involved, as candidates never declare any policy manifestos, and never engage in a public: primary and hustings, meaning these 11 Councillors have no policy mandate and escape public scrutiny about that too; which allows the mainstream national parties’ politicians above, to do whatever they like to the people of Stow.

So at the Stow Town Council Elections:- the absence of public: primaries and hustings, also the absence of any declared: parties and policy manifestos, but then also the repeatedly, neatly arranged number of candidates to avoid an election contest among themselves, and finally not a single whistle being blown regarding any of these oh so obvious local election frauds, all demonstrate that these frauds are all arranged and condoned by every single mainstream national party, with the intent comprehensively to defraud all democratic sovereignty powers, and so ultimately all significant information and wealth away from the 1741 electors of Stow, and to these national parties and therefore not to Cirencester, or to Gloucester, but to Westminster and Brussels also Washington and Basel, where the heads of these criminal oligarchies actually are headquartered.

Basel is where the BIS is based whose secret shareholders form the Global Bankers Oligarchy, who together with their nationalist and globalist corporate allies, actually constantly create wars and terrorism, also public and private debts, also banking collapses and all for their own nationalist and globalist oligarchy’s power and profit, but firstly they have comprehensively both either to suppress by force and or by fraud all local governments, in order to achieve their absolutist: national and global oligarchies.

So it’s whether there is anyone in Stow ready to fight back regarding these comprehensive election frauds, before you are all completely and utterly fleeced and slaughtered by these national and global oligarchs, aided by in this case their not so greatly clever but continually sneaky organised criminal, 11 Stow Councillors, and by their local mainstream, national party politician controllers?

......

Fn1:- check out all 94 of the Cotswold District Town & Parish Councils’ Election Results directly at: “Cotswold District Election Results” at: www.cotswold.gov.uk/about-the-council/elections/election-results/ click; “Parish Council Elections”; as these 94 Local Elections’ results are the evidential 'smoking gun' regarding the mainstream national party politicians’ comprehensive elections frauds. If you read ‘The 6 Reform Articles’; (see Fn.7) that’s where we enumerate all 6 comprehensive frauds, so then together with this results link (above) you can then note that all 6 comprehensive election frauds are used in each Stow Election, and that at least 5 are used in every other local election in the Cotswold District. In other words regarding framing criminal indictments the evidence is in plain view, at this link - once you read The 6 Reform Articles (below) so that you know what you're looking for.

Fn2. until a week ago this local elections results link (above) was suppressed, for the obvious reason, that if you examine it, then every result reveals compelling evidence that each local election is comprehensively party politician defrauded:- they mostly use ‘The 6 Reform Articles’ (see Fn.7) fraud 1; as more fully described in fraud 3; Fne; and or fraud 6 - with the 4 further comprehensive frauds, enhancing these first 2; (it was a Cotswold Chartist campaign that restored this results link to visibility last week, it having been repeatedly suppressed, since we first drew attention to it, in 2012).

Fn3. our brief video on comprehensive election fraud is at: www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSCU0GPqD8Y (8 minutes)

Fn4. check out 28 generic frauds & extortions run on you all, by the corporate oligarchies: www.sandysteel.co.uk then click: ‘UK/Global Frauds’. Particularly scroll to the 6 ‘Energy Frauds’ links, as energy underpins the entire economy:- so then you’ll see how the Global economy is totally defrauded by an oligarchy, and what we could easily combine & do about it.

Fn5. photographing your own completed Ballot Papers as evidence of how you voted is lawful! Recording this evidence is important, since it may become critical to have this evidence of how you really voted, in order to expose these election fraudsters’ comprehensive frauds. Even more so, since they’re now also well up for a comprehensive ballot count defraud, particularly regarding the postal ballots. So don’t let Polling Officers intimidate you into not carefully photographing your own ballot papers, by telling you anything different. Today’s Polling Staff are controlled by the criminal Mainstream National Party Politicians, and these staff are so conditioned that they never stop & ask themselves would a Jury condone this or that practice or condemn it, as fraud, which is what really determines ‘The Law’ in the UK, and not the Party Politicians’ statutory instruments, nor bureaucrats’ orders, nor anything else. But if you read about the UK Bench Justices’ 2 generic treasonous frauds, (below) you’ll get why, this conditioning can occur)

Fn 6:- about the comprehensive fraud of the forthcoming Stow Town Council Election; 7th May 2015. Because of the successful, comprehensive frauds here, both in 2007 & in 2011, so the chances of a free & fair, lawful election on the 7th May 2015 are nil, which is why you should all:-
• not vote for any of the printed candidates till the 6 comprehensive frauds regarding The Stow Town Councillors' Elections, which are all enumerated below, are properly redressed,
• instead write boldly on each Ballot Paper that you are voting for yourself, and carefully photo each one, before putting it in the ballot box, as evidence; which photos are lawful to do!
• contact each other, to coordinate further lawful actions, in order to create a genuinely democratic, lawful and effectual Stow Town Council local government.

Otherwise you’ll all continue stealthily, comprehensively to be fleeced and or slaughtered like the sheeple you currently really are, and it's run by a coalition of national and global corporations which oligarchies only interest is to maximise profit from you all, and be that by commercial profiteering, or by war profiteering:– whichever one makes them the most profit, so you the most losses – they’ll promote that. As you can see from the above, the National Party Politicians’ Corporates are comprehensively sneaky about how they go about this, and they have a bevy of local quislings, covertly to do all their local dirty work for them, and no questions asked!

Fn 7.our Reforms Articles concerning 6 comprehensive frauds of the Stow elections & elections generally:-

1. Annual Public:- Primaries, Hustings and Elections for every MP also Cllr. In addition that on every Ballot Paper there is the option for The Elector not to sign away their political power to anyone else, but to retain their political power themselves:-

Fna; UK MPs and Councillors don’t run Public: Primaries and Hustings, which is in order that their own elective posts aren’t properly publically advertised, which fraud by not properly advertising their own posts, enables the majority of UK Local Councillors and their privately invited either party associates or personal mates stealthily, repeatedly to be Elected Automatically, without any Election Contests at all, or elected with a token contest; as they collectively impeded all other candidates even to stand and if they do, to have a free and fair contest. By contrast any proper public primary enables the candidates to be publicly scrutinised, and before the Nominations Stage ends and both for stealthy rings, and for poor manifestos; Fnb; the original Chartists and Tom Payne demanded annual elections. The reason why the Party and Local Politicians never implemented this, either, is that they like to use their perennial unaccountability comprehensively to defraud the electorate. Fnc: The UK’s Party Politician MPs & Cllrs compose each Ballot Paper in such a way that each Elector can only sign away their political power to others, not retain it for themselves, which formal, legal fallacy comprehensively defrauds: power, information & money towards the Party Politicians’ and to their Party Elites, also to their usually stealthy, wealthy backers. By contrast local, national and global politics could all be conducted by a qualified, or an absolute Direct Democracy, as ancient Athens had and some modern Swiss Cities have; therefore on each Ballot Paper each elector aught to have the option to retain their political powers for themselves, therefore voting for some form of Direct Democracy in that Council or Parliament; (see a Direct Democracy reform, recommended in Article No 4 below).

2. No MP or Councillor to sit in any Parliament or Council for over 1 year.

Fn; if we restrict the total term in office in every Parliament and every Council to one year, then the power has to be shared out, which is what a genuine democracy is about.

By contrast today’s MPs and Cllrs cling on to power, for as long as possible, and now often for a life time - which is government by a parasitic clique, so not remotely a government by the people:- hence via such careerism, they also comprehensively defraud any genuine democracy.

3. All MP & Cllr candidates to publish their own manifestos, rather than what occurs nowadays, which is the comprehensive bribery both of Party Politicians and their Small Town and Rural Parish Councillor Quislings, regarding policy matters; (the latter being bribed often simply by being given petty but arbitrary power).

Fnd; currently National Party Politicians never publish their own manifestos, as they give up their own right and their constituents’ rights to decide policies to their Party Elite, in return for being promoted by that Party Elite, firstly with advertising money at their election, then with paid, public posts, which is a policy bribery system. By contrast every MP and Cllr candidate should write their own manifesto and never be bribed on any policy matter, or any public matter. Fne. Also Rural Parish and Small Town Local Election Candidates and incumbent Councillors are covertly told by their Party Politician controllers neither to declare their party, nor a manifesto, nor to run a public: primary and hustings, all which is another comprehensive policy defraud and election defraud system, but this one is tailored in order covertly comprehensively to defraud the UK's Rural Elections both in these Mainstream National Party Politicians' favour, who hold the more senior rural public posts and in favour of their covert quislings on Small Town and Rural Parish Councils; (see No 6 for the Mainstream National Party Politicians’ comprehensive fraud of the UK’s Urban Elections).

4. A two chambered ‘Bicameral System’ in each Parliament and each Council, where one Chamber is either the whole electorate if that is practicable,or otherwise selected on a random, rota basis like a Jury is, while the other Chamber is elected. Furthermore all from aged 8 onwards, are included in the Jury Chambers, & who have the vote there.


Fnf; This bicameralism; (a two chambered political system), ensures that every group in society is proportionately politically represented, not just the wealthy; so the Party Politicians' present comprehensive fraud of democracy, where they claim that their Elective Representative Councils and Parliaments are democratic places, when every underprivileged group in UK society, still has no direct representation in any of these places what so ever, is finally thoroughly addressed. Fng; Public Institutional & Public Elites’ Personal Child Abuse is Universal today, where the already comprehensively criminal State Elite institutionally abuses our children in plain view, with their 'one size fits all' and now neuro-linguistic programming Universal Curriculum, and more covertly by their condoned and or sponsored pederasty rings among Party Politicians & other Public Elites, which are in order covertly publically to control both by an elitist blackmailing system, and by a child abuse system, including by its threat to the general population, via the same elites’ secret Family Courts’ System seizing children. By contrast this measure intends to help restore children to the control of their parents, their local communities, and common law.

5. MPs not to be paid more than the minimum wage, plus out of pocket expenses, also Cllrs not to take other than out of pocket expenses.

Fn; To be a democratic MP or Cllr should be a temporary, vocational honour; so not for profit. Their expenses should be such so that no-one through poverty is denied the chance to serve. If we remove the MPs and Cllrs' excessive time in Office, and their excessive public incomes for Office, then the party political elite's present continuous offer of excessive public incomes in order comprehensively to bribe the MPs & Cllrs, on policy matters, is greatly reduced. It also means that the middle and low incomed will be able, to be directly represented in all UK elective chambers, so the present comprehensive democratic defraud of the middle and low incomed, also of low capitaled groups, in our society by the UK's senior Cllrs and MPs, will be able to be tackled.

6. All UK so called 'Local Elections' to be truly local, rather than stealthily super-duper sized, which is another Mainstream National Party Politicians' Comprehensive Elections Fraud System, used to defraud every UK large town and city election, in their favour.

Fn; Currently all of the UK’s larger towns and cities' so called 'Local Elections' have been stealthily super-duper sized by 10 to 100 fold compared with the rural local elections, which typically contain less than three hundred electors, while the former typically contain from three thousand to fifteen thousand electors, which super-duper sizing is entirely in order that the UK's larger towns & cities' electors now can't know their 'local candidates', which coerces these electors to vote for the Mainstream National Parties' Candidates at all of these still so called 'local elections':- and this comprehensive 'entry gate' elections' fraud system, in turn then benefits and protects all of the UK's Larger Towns and Cities' more senior Mainstream National Party Politicians as well, so this is a comprehensive fraud of the UK's Larger Towns' & Cities' Elections! By contrast every UK Local Council aught to have wards of under 100 hundred electors, and these wards subdivided again to as little as 10 electors per returned Cllr, so that the electors are all likely to know all of their local Cllr candidates, and vice versa, because then it becomes much harder for any local Cllrs to become engaged in any party frauds, still less in any National Party Politicians' comprehensive frauds of the UK's electors, which is what does happen in UK politics today.

27th March 2015.

The Stow Town Chartists:’ contact ------/-------- on facebook or T:-----/------- between ---- & ----

Cotswold Constituency Coordinator: Sandy Steel; T: 01285-850590 Ans Mach; [e-mail] ; www.sandysteel.co.uk or on facebook -

...

The Stow Chartists

our 2 Reform Articles regarding The Bench Justices'
and Party Politicians' Comprehensive UK Jurisdiction:
Frauds and Robberies also Extortions and Disseizes

1. That every complainant and defendant has ready access to a Jury Trial; be it for a misdemeanour like a parking ticket, or a felony.

The Party Politicians and Bench Justices have in practice robbed and defrauded us of our inalienable right to a Jury Trial, with less than 1% of UK court cases now referred to Jury Trial:- moreover at these trials the Party Politicians and Bench Justices maliciously apply retributive punishments, in order to divide, and therefore conquer us.

Their retributive sentencing is in order to divide rather than reconcile the complainants and defendants, also the jury; which latter is fraudulently dismissed regarding sentencing. So healing, restorative, reconciliatory justice isn’t their intent, but maliciously to divide us and so conquer us, is their intent.

Their public pretext for comprehensively suppressing our rights to Jury Trial is the cost, but Juries should be as cheap as chips, since chips and tea is all that the Jurors need to perform; so it's the elaborate frauds and robberies of the Common Law rights of the plaintiffs, and defendants also jurors in order, to corrupt each jury trial, so that each finds only what the Bench Justices, and Party Politicians, also their legal accessories want it to find, that costs us all, the extra money.

So via malicious fraud and force over 99% of UK court cases are compelled through the Bench Justices’ & Party Politicians’ own corporate privatised for profit 'Civil Law Courts’, which have the same ‘divide and conquer’ the community practices.
....
By contrast Magna Carta; 1215; Section 39, reads:- “No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or deprived of his standing in any way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgment of his equals or by the law of the land”; and S.40 reads: “To no one will we sell, to no one deny or delay right or justice.”

“Some people point to Section 39’s last clause: “...or by the law of the land” and they believe that it allows The Party Politicians & Bench Justices to compel men and women to be tried by their ‘Civil Law Courts’, rather than by Jury Trial, Common Law Courts, but “The Law of the Land” only means by the precedent of previous Jury Trials:- so 'The Law of the Land' in Britain is only by Jury Trial, Common Law!”

“In other words The Party Politicians’ own Statutes and The Bench Justices’ own court decisions; i.e. their own ‘Civil Law’ isn’t ‘The Law of The Land’, so which aught only to be applied if both the complainant and defendant have given informed consent to this actually privatised justice!”
.....
By contrast: all true Jury Trial, Common Law Jurisdiction is based on past precedent, or on informed consent. Since Common Law’s origins are in Saxon Law and Dane Law, which only used Foremen and Juries, not Judges at all, so Judges aren’t necessary to UK Trials. So regarding their retributive sentencing system, the Judges aught to be dispensed with by their Juries, for this maliciously divisive sentencing, and rather the Judges & Juries should be operating preventative and healing, also restorative and reconciliatory sentencing.

So both on this jurisdiction precedent, and on this malicious process cause, (or if the Jury has any other reasonable cause, such as a Judge’s excessive costs & obfuscations, or any other divisive, perversion of Common Law), then that Judge may be set aside by the Jury, and then it alone can decide the verdict and the sentencing; if it’s according either to precedent or to the informed consent of the complainant and defendant.

Conversely; if a Judge can reasonably show that a Jury has unreasonably departed both from precedent and consent, then that Jury’s decision should be appealable to a senior Judge, who then needs must call or recall a Jury, and so on.

So while today Party Politicians and Bench Justices and their legal associates customarily use malicious force and fraud to suppress the Common Law substituting communally divisive: verdicts, sentences and judgements in order for themselves continuously to rule us, and for their own profit and power.

by contrast ordinarily what should occur is a genuine Bicameral Justice System, where the judge by checking and complementing the Jury is useful to them, and vice versa, so then they both attain a mutual informed assent over the verdict and the sentencing, also in a continuum until the complainant and defendant also give their mutual informed consents both to the verdict and the sentencing. That's the way towards reconciliatory justice, for all the parties concerned.
....

2. Withhold ‘Civil Law’:- taxes, charges and fines, till our Parliaments, Councils, Courts, Services & Utilities are run by Lawful People under Jury Trial ‘Common Law’ Jurisdiction

“withhold from all of the above criminals and their accessories their current comprehensively: defrauding and robbing also extorting and disseizing ‘Civil Law’:- taxes, fines, charges and, fees; until our Parliaments, Councils and Courts are not being run by such criminal oligarchies, but by lawful men and women, under the Common Law.”

Fn. Mainstream, National Party Politicians, Bench Justice, Lawyers, Barristers, Senior Police and their wealthy corporate clients, benefit from their privatized for profit ‘Civil Law’ Jurisdiction, so who ‘pull the wool’ so that the General Public don’t know how to access the not for profit, Common Law, so the latter pay all of the former, though the nose, in Civil Law extorted: taxes, fines, charges & fees to which no jury has consented.

For example consider the comprehensive UK Election Frauds described above, so there’s no lawful consent there. Then consider the nationalized and globalised corporatised utilities, all stolen via their Civil Law; & so neither via an informed consented to Civil Law Jurisdiction, nor under Common Law. Then also consider all the earlier Common Lands lost belonging to every village and town, again stolen, and again not via informed consented to Civil Law Jurisdiction, nor under Common Law.

Another example; consider the millions of pounds the UK Government now makes from parking & speed fines et al, where people have neither parked obstructively, nor driven carelessly of another person; so again regardless of whether the fine is lawful under Jury Trial, Common Law.

For example also consider how the Government got rid of all minor railways, including the track beds in the 1960’s therefore forcing much of the population onto the roads each day; then created mass immigration as well, and all for their own, and their colleagues’ corporatist profits, without even an overt ‘by your leave’ in any manifestos; still less any Jury Trial Common Law consents, but all covertly.

None of the above is accidental, rather it is all designed to keep ordinary peoples' noses to the grindstone in an era of mechanisation that should have brought everyone an unprecedented easy prosperity and peace, but which are anathema to any absolutist oligarchies maintaining their absolutist rule, because such require little held in common, and a chronic: ignorance, poverty, also terror, so that is what they and their quislings in every town and village have diligently, criminally created and now maintain.

So if you do look at what our National Party Politicians’ Government and most Bench Justices really do, the more you see that they are running a comprehensively criminal political and legal system in the UK to benefit their own ever increasingly wealthy, corporatist oligarchies, and allied wealthy corporatist oligarchies.

So never vote for anyone who’s not signed up to these 8 election and law reforms. If none are, then go to the polling station and spoil your ballot papers by writing boldly on each ballot paper either your own name and make it clear that you are voting only for yourself, (or if you want to remain anonymous just write something like:- “I am voting only for myself” ), then if you possibly can, carefully photograph your ballot papers before placing them in the ballot box, as evidence that you did only vote for yourself and not for any of the above, also then consider contacting each other and us, so we can help create a Grand Jury in order lawfully to pursue the above, because they are all organised ‘controlled’ fraudsters, because your elections and your law are being comprehensively defrauded and robbed, and none of them have resigned and whistle-blown as they should!


29/03/15
The Stow Chartists’ - Contact: ------/------, on facebook on T:-----/-------- between ---- & ----

Cotswold Constituency Coordinator; Sandy Steel; T: 01285-850590 Ans Mach; [e-mail] ; www.sandysteel.co.uk