Post by Admin on Apr 7, 2015 16:37:15 GMT
Cirencester Town, Watermoor Ward Chartists
6 comprehensive frauds of their own elections conducted by The Cirencester Town Council’s 3 Watermoor Ward Councillors, and by their local, senior Party Politician controllers
At Cirencester’s Town Council; Watermoor Ward Election 2007 there were 3 seats, and just 2 candidates:- so these 2 candidates were automatically elected without an election contest, and which occurred because of 6 comprehensive election frauds which were run by all 17 of the Cirencester Town Councillors, and by their more senior local, National Party Politician controllers.
Firstly they had already supersized The Town Council’s five wards, so that The Watermoor Ward had a whopping 3283 electors; intending that the electors were then unlikely to know their still so called “local candidates” personally, therefore the electors were being covertly coerced to vote for mainstream, national parties’ candidates, at this still so called “local election”. Next all 17 Town Councillors also stealthily failed properly publically to advertise this Ward’s three elective posts by omitting to run a public: primary and hustings, so the prospective candidates couldn’t be publically investigated by their electors. Finally the Mainstream National Political Parties also allow their “local” candidates to omit to declare to the electors, their parties and their policies in order that these can then appear, and or pretend to be independents, if they want, when in fact they are covertly Mainstream National Party Politically associated, promoted and controlled.
That only two candidates even stood, for the Town Council; Watermoor Ward’s three available seats in 2007 and that they were both declared Lib Dems, illustrates very plainly that this so called “local election” was comprehensively defrauded by the local senior mainstream national party politicians’ in their own candidates’ favour, via the first 2 of the comprehensive and compound frauds (described above), because what can happen in such a rather too clearly defrauded ‘local election’, is that no honest people are liable to stand in it. That’s what happened here.
In other words: this so called “local election” had been so comprehensively defrauded by all the senior local Mainstream National Party Politicians in their own already national and global corporates' policy controlled candidates’ favour, that only two persons in Watermoor could be induced by that criminal national party politicians’ cartel, to take part, in this still alleged “local election”.
Just to backtrack about the 2nd comprehensive fraud. The 17 incumbent Cirencester Town Councillors, by their never running any public: primary and hustings in any Cirencester ward, so they never properly publically advertise their own elective posts, which is in order that they and their party political mates, and or their personal mates, are therefore highly likely to be re-elected/elected, either with a token contest, or as here in 2007, automatically with no contest at all.
In other words they have cut-out the public scrutiny of the prospective candidates, because the town Councillors are actually all already bought and paid for, by the mainstream national parties’ elites on policy matters, so who also defraud the elections in their own and in their party elites’ favour, and a proper public primary phase would likely reveal that comprehensive criminality of this supposedly “local election” both being 'ringed' by National Party Politician Candidates and who are all already being comprehensively bribed on policy.
These 3 comprehensive election frauds (described above) are just 3 of 6 frauds, which all 17 Cirencester Town Councillors together with their more senior, local Mainstream, National Party Politician Controllers use, in order that all of the alleged “local elections” here, are actually constantly and comprehensively defrauded in their own either covert or overt mainstream, national parties’ candidates' favour. .
Moreover these 6 comprehensive local election frauds (all enumerated in fn7) of which I've so far explained just 3, are used to defraud not just this local election, but UK local elections comprehensively; which in turn defrauds all the non local UK elections in the same mainstream national political parties’ favour, since they’ve thus comprehensively impeded everyone except members of their own mainstream, national political parties, even to start in UK politics via these 6 generic, comprehensive local elections' frauds.
So what you are looking at above, are 3 election ‘entry gate’ frauds, which together with 3 more (see Fn7) are replicated across the UK, meaning the UK Elections are comprehensively defrauded! Since these 6 comprehensive election frauds are generic to the UK’s elections, so I’ll leave off explaining the remaining 3 election frauds here, and just enumerate all 6 in ‘The 6 Reform Articles’ below, so that I don’t repeat myself.
So if you want to understand how comprehensively you are election defrauded by all of your Cllrs, and by all of the UK MPs also MEPs in modern times, then read till the end, then maybe follow the link, concerning 28 ways that we’re generically defrauded by the UK's comprehensively criminal mainstream national party politicians' cartel and oligarchy, and by their associated national and global corporatist oligarchies, including most extremely comprehensively by the global energy oligarchy, and by the global militarists-industrialists oligarchy, also which are capped, by the global bankers' oligarchy.
By contrast, any free, fair, lawful election would occur on the basis of each candidate having both to declare their candidacy, and to supply a manifesto, also at the public primary stage; that is correctly at a public primary meeting before the nominations close, in order to ensure the electorate is given a free and fair, lawful election, which of course it wasn’t given here, at all.
At the Cirencester Town, Watermoor Ward Election 2011 there were 3 seats, and 5 candidates; comprising:- 3LDs, and 1Con & 1 Ind, so there was an election contest, and the 3LDs won it, while the 1 Ind (Leslie Andrews) came last by over 200 votes. So what is clear is that the local, mainstream national parties’ politicians’ aforementioned 6 comprehensive election frauds in their own candidates’ favour paid off, at this alleged “local election”.
Remember all of the mainstream national parties’ local politicians’ important policies are decided by corporatist elites at the national and or global level, so this supposed “local election” was comprehensively defrauded by a national and global corporatist oligarchy, who all of the LDs, and Cons, also Labs, UKIPs and Greens serve.
So what really happened in 2011 was the same 3 comprehensive election frauds that were operated in 2007 (described above), plus 3 more frauds (described in fn7) were all operated, once again. This explains how this suposed local election could be so easily comprehensively criminally cartel ‘market shared’ once again in favour of 2 mainstream national political parties candidates, so the electors had no genuine local choices once again, because of the lack of any public scrutiny phase, and the supersizing, also 4 more frauds (Fn 7).
It also needs to be remembered that the mainstream parties also use undeclared candidates ‘locally’ in order to further defraud the electors, so the question of whether Leslie Andrews was genuinely an honest independent or actually a covert party political stalking horse candidate, also was unknown to the electors because the mainstream parties entirely supress any public: primary and hustings, so even their so called the “local candidates” can’t be publically scrutinised into by their electors.
(To point the finger at Watermoor Ward’s 2 elected LD Councillors in 2007 for doing nothing to remit the 6 comprehensive election cartel frauds during their own term (2007-2011) which had caused their own uncontested election (2007) and the comprehensive fraud of the 2011 election to happen too, is fair, together with Cirencester Town Council’s 15 other Councillors and all of their more senior, local party politician controllers. They’re all severally and collectively criminally indictable for using these 6 comprehensive election frauds (all enumerated in fn7.)
Just to backtrack, in order to illustrate graphically about the criminality of the mainstream national party politicians’ stealthily supersizing of the Cirencester Town Council’s Watermoor Ward and the four other Wards, by about tenfold from what it aught to be, so only their candidates are liable to stand and win, at these still so called ‘local elections’.
For a comparative example:- The Coberly Parish Council has a typical rural ward with 280 Electors, and 5 Councillors; by contrast The Cirencester Town Council; Watermoor Ward now has 3,369 Electors, and only 3 Councillors, so the intention here is by having stealthily delocalised this still alleged ‘local election’, so the Watermoor electors are therefore unlikely to know their still so called ‘local’ candidates personally, so the electors are being coerced into voting for the national party political brands at their still so called “local election”.
Moreover all of which national party political candidates have all already been criminally bribed on all significant policies, by their national party political elites offer to promote them firstly with their advertising and party branding, in order to win this stealthily supersized local election, and then with well paid public posts on the District and County Councils, to which they therefore cling, often for decades, but all of these inducements only if they continually both follow their national party political elites on policy matters, which is a comprehensive policy bribery system, also only if they continuously do apply the 6 comprehensive election frauds both in their own and in their party elites favour (all enumerated in fn7).
....
So once you look at the Town Council, Watermoor Ward Election it’s clearly comprehensively, criminally defrauded in 6 compound ways both by its 3 Councillors and by their national party politician controllers. So the Watermoor Ward’s 3369 Electors certainly haven’t had a free and fair lawful election since 2007 and most likely long before that too, as their local elections, therefore all of their elections, are successfully defrauded by the Mainstream National Party Politicians’ Cartel, via the six comprehensive frauds of which 3 are explained and evidenced above, and all 6 are enumerated in fn7.
......
Fn1:- check out all 94 of the Cotswold District Town & Parish Councils’ Election Results directly at: “Cotswold District Election Results” at: www.cotswold.gov.uk/about-the-council/elections/election-results/ click; “Parish Council Elections”; as these 94 Local Elections’ results are the evidential 'smoking gun' regarding the mainstream national party politicians’ comprehensive elections frauds. If you read ‘The 6 Reform Articles’; (see bottom) that’s where we enumerate all 6 comprehensive frauds, so then together with this results link (above) you can then note that all 6 comprehensive election frauds are used in each Cirencester Town Ward Election, and that at least 5 are used in every other local election in the Cotswold District. In other words regarding framing criminal indictments the evidence is in plain view, at this link - once you read The 6 Reform Articles (below) so that you know what you're looking for. Fn2. until a week ago this local elections results link (above) was suppressed, for the obvious reason, that if you examine it, then every result reveals compelling evidence that each local election is comprehensively party politician defrauded:- they mostly use ‘The 6 Reform Articles’ (see bottom) fraud 1; as more fully described in fraud 3; Fne; and or fraud 6 - with the 4 further comprehensive frauds, enhancing these first 2; (it was a Cotswold Chartist campaign that restored this results link to visibility last week, it having been repeatedly suppressed, since we first drew attention to it, in 2012).
Fn3. our brief video on comprehensive election fraud is at: www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSCU0GPqD8Y (8 minutes)
Fn4. check out 28 generic frauds & extortions run on you all, by the corporate oligarchies: www.sandysteel.co.uk then click: ‘UK/Global Frauds’. Particularly scroll to the 6 ‘Energy Frauds’ links, as energy underpins the entire economy:- so then you’ll see how the Global economy is totally defrauded by an oligarchy, and what we could easily combine & do about it.
Fn5. photographing your own completed Ballot Papers as evidence of how you voted is lawful! Recording this evidence is important, since it may become critical to have this evidence of how you really voted, in order to expose these election fraudsters’ comprehensive frauds. Even more so, since they’re now also well up for a comprehensive ballot count defraud, particularly regarding the postal ballots. So don’t let Polling Officers intimidate you into not carefully photographing your own ballot papers, by telling you anything different. Today’s Polling Staff are controlled by the criminal Mainstream National Party Politicians, and these staff are so conditioned that they never stop & ask themselves would a Jury condone this or that practice or condemn it, as fraud, which is what really determines ‘The Law’ in the UK, and not the Party Politicians’ statutory instruments, nor bureaucrats’ orders, nor anything else. But if you read about the UK Bench Justices’ 2 generic treasonous frauds, (below) you’ll get why, this conditioning can occur)
Fn 6:- about the comprehensive fraud of the forthcoming Town Council, Stratton Ward Election; 7th May 2015. Because of the successful, comprehensive frauds here, both in 2007 & in 2011 & in 2013, so the chances of a free & fair, lawful election on the 7th May 2015 are nil, which is why you should all:-
• not vote for any of the printed candidates till the 6 comprehensive frauds regarding The Watermoor Ward Election, which are all enumerated below, are properly redressed,
• instead write boldly on each Ballot Paper that you are voting for yourself, and carefully photo each one, before putting it in the ballot box, as evidence; which photos are lawful to do!
• contact each other, to coordinate further lawful actions, in order to create a genuinely democratic, lawful and effectual Cirencester Town Council, Watermoor Ward local government.
Otherwise you’ll all continue stealthily, comprehensively to be fleeced and or slaughtered like the sheeple you currently really are, and it's run by a coalition of national and global corporations which oligarchies only interest is to maximise profit from you all, and be that by commercial profiteering, or by war profiteering:– whichever one makes them the most profit, so you the most losses – they’ll promote that. As you can see from the above, the National Party Politicians’ Corporates are comprehensively sneaky about how they go about this, and they have a bevy of local quislings, covertly to do all their local dirty work for them, and no questions asked!
Fn 7 .ourReforms Articles concerning 6 comprehensive frauds of the Stratton elections & elections generally
1. Annual Public:- Primaries, Hustings and Elections for every MP also Cllr. In addition that on every Ballot Paper there is the option for The Elector not to sign away their political power to anyone else, but to retain their political power themselves:-
Fna; UK MPs and Councillors don’t run Public: Primaries and Hustings, which is in order that their own elective posts aren’t properly publically advertised, which fraud by not properly advertising their own posts, enables the majority of UK Local Councillors and their privately invited either party associates or personal mates stealthily, repeatedly to be Elected Automatically, without any Election Contests at all; as they collectively impeded all other candidates to stand. By contrast any proper public primary enables the candidates to be publicly scrutinised, and before the Nominations Stage ends and both for stealthy rings, and for poor manifestos; Fnb; the original Chartists and Tom Payne demanded annual elections. The reason why the Party and Local Politicians never implemented this, either, is that they like to use their perennial unaccountability comprehensively to defraud the electorate. Fnc: The UK’s Party Politician MPs & Cllrs compose each Ballot Paper in such a way that each Elector can only sign away their political power to others, not retain it for themselves, which formal, legal fallacy comprehensively defrauds: power, information & money towards the Party Politicians’ and to their Party Elites, also to their usually stealthy, wealthy backers. By contrast local, national and global politics could all be conducted by a qualified, or an absolute Direct Democracy, as ancient Athens had and some modern Swiss Cities have; therefore on each Ballot Paper each elector aught to have the option to retain their political powers for themselves, therefore voting for some form of Direct Democracy in that Council or Parliament; (see a Direct Democracy reform, recommended in Article No 4 below).
2. No MP or Councillor to sit in any Parliament or Council for over 1 year.
Fn; if we restrict the total term in office in every Parliament and every Council to one year, then the power has to be shared out, which is what a genuine democracy is about. By contrast today’s MPs and Cllrs cling on to power, for as long as possible, and now often for a life time - which is government by a parasitic clique, so not remotely a government by the people:- hence via such careerism, they also comprehensively defraud any genuine democracy.
3. All MP & Cllr candidates to publish their own manifestos, rather than what occurs nowadays, which is the comprehensive bribery both of Party Politicians and their Small Town and Rural Parish Councillor Quislings, regarding policy matters; (the latter being bribed often simply by being given petty but arbitrary power). Fnd; currently National Party Politicians never publish their own manifestos, as they give up their own right and their constituents’ rights to decide policies to their Party Elite, in return for being promoted by that Party Elite, firstly with advertising money at their election, then with paid, public posts, which is a policy bribery system. By contrast every MP and Cllr candidate should write their own manifesto and never be bribed on any policy matter, or any public matter. Fne. Also Rural Parish and Small Town Local Election Candidates and incumbent Councillors are covertly told by their Party Politician controllers neither to declare their party, nor a manifesto, nor to run a public: primary and hustings, all which is another comprehensive policy defraud and election defraud system, but this one is tailored in order covertly comprehensively to defraud the UK's Rural Elections both in these Mainstream National Party Politicians' favour, who hold the more senior rural public posts and in favour of their covert quislings on Small Town and Rural Parish Councils; (see No 6 for the Mainstream National Party Politicians’ comprehensive fraud of the UK’s Urban Elections).
4. A two chambered ‘Bicameral System’ in each Parliament and each Council, where one Chamber is either the whole electorate if that is practicable,or otherwise selected on a random, rota basis like a Jury is, while the other Chamber is elected. Furthermore all from aged 8 onwards, are included in the Jury Chambers, & who have the vote there.Fnf; This bicameralism; (a two chambered political system), ensures that every group in society is proportionately politically represented, not just the wealthy; so the Party Politicians' present comprehensive fraud of democracy, where they claim that their Elective Representative Councils and Parliaments are democratic places, when every underprivileged group in UK society, still has no direct representation in any of these places what so ever, is finally thoroughly addressed. Fng; Public Institutional & Public Elites’ Personal Child Abuse is Universal today, where the already comprehensively criminal State Elite institutionally abuses our children in plain view, with their 'one size fits all' and now neuro-linguistic programming Universal Curriculum, and more covertly by their condoned and or sponsored pederasty rings among Party Politicians & other Public Elites, which are in order covertly publically to control both by an elitist blackmailing system, and by a child abuse system, including by its threat to the general population, via the same elites’ secret Family Courts’ System seizing children. By contrast this measure intends to help restore children to the control of their parents, their local communities, and common law.
Fn; To be a democratic MP or Cllr should be a temporary, vocational honour; so not for profit. Their expenses should be such so that no-one through poverty is denied the chance to serve. If we remove the MPs and Cllrs' excessive time in Office, and their excessive public incomes for Office, then the party political elite's present continuous offer of excessive public incomes in order comprehensively to bribe the MPs & Cllrs, on policy matters, is greatly reduced. It also means that the middle and low incomed will be able, to be directly represented in all UK elective chambers, so the present comprehensive democratic defraud of the middle and low incomed, also of low capitaled groups, in our society by the UK's senior Cllrs and MPs, will be able to be tackled.
6. All UK so called 'Local Elections' to be truly local, rather than stealthily super-duper sized, which is another Mainstream National Party Politicians' Comprehensive Elections Fraud System, used to defraud every UK large town and city election, in their favour.Fn; Currently all of the UK’s larger towns and cities' so called 'Local Elections' have been stealthily super-duper sized by 10 to 100 fold compared with the rural local elections, which typically contain less than three hundred electors, while the former typically contain from three thousand to fifteen thousand electors, which super-duper sizing is entirely in order that the UK's larger towns & cities' electors now can't know their 'local candidates', which coerces these electors to vote for the Mainstream National Parties' Candidates at all of these still so called 'local elections':- and this comprehensive 'entry gate' elections' fraud system, in turn then benefits and protects all of the UK's Larger Towns and Cities' more senior Mainstream National Party Politicians as well, so this is a comprehensive fraud of the UK's Larger Towns' & Cities' Elections! By contrast every UK Local Council aught to have wards of under 100 hundred electors, and these wards subdivided again to as little as 10 electors per returned Cllr, so that the electors are all likely to know all of their local Cllr candidates, and vice versa, because then it becomes much harder for any local Cllrs to become engaged in any party frauds, still less in any National Party Politicians' comprehensive frauds of the UK's electors, which is what does happen in UK politics today.
27th March 2015.
The CirencesterTown, Watermoor Ward Chartists:’ contact ------/------- on facebook or T:-----/------- between ---- & ----
Cotswold Constituency Coordinator: Sandy Steel; T: 01285-850590 Ans Mach; james.steel1@virgin.net ; www.sandysteel.co.uk or on facebook -
...
The CirencesterTown, Watermoor Ward Chartists:’ contact ------/------- on facebook or T:-----/------- between ---- & ----
Cotswold Constituency Coordinator: Sandy Steel; T: 01285-850590 Ans Mach; james.steel1@virgin.net ; www.sandysteel.co.uk or on facebook -
...
Cirencester Town, Watermoor Ward Chartists
1. That every complainant and defendant has ready access to a Jury Trial; be it for a misdemeanour like a parking ticket, or a felony.
The Party Politicians and Bench Justice in practice rob and defraud us of our inalienable right to a Jury Trial, with less than 1% of UK court cases now referred to Jury Trial:- moreover at these trials the Party Politicians and Bench Justices maliciously apply retributive punishments, in order to divide, and therefore conquer us.
Their retributive sentencing is in order to divide rather than reconcile the complainants and the defendants, also the jury; which later is fraudulently dismissed regarding sentencing. So healing, restorative, reconciliatory justice isn’t their intent, but maliciously to divide us, and so conquer us, is their intent.
Their public pretext for comprehensively suppressing our rights to Jury Trial is the cost, but Juries should be as cheap as chips, since chips and tea is all that the Jurors need to perform; so it's the elaborate frauds and robberies of the Common Law rights of: the plaintiffs, and the defendants, also the jurors in order, to corrupt each jury trial, so that each finds only what the Bench Justices, and Party Politicians, also their legal accessories want it to find, that costs us all, the extra money.
So via malicious fraud and force over 99% of UK court cases are compelled through the Bench Justices’ & Party Politicians’ own corporate privatised for profit 'Civil Law Courts’, which have the same ‘divide and conquer’ the community practices.
....
By contrast Magna Carta; 1215; Section 39, reads:- “No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or deprived of his standing in any way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgment of his equals or by the law of the land”; and S.40 reads: “To no one will we sell, to no one deny or delay right or justice.”
“Some people point to Section 39’s last clause: “...or by the law of the land” and they believe that it allows The Party Politicians & Bench Justices to compel men and women to be tried by their ‘Civil Law Courts’, rather than by Jury Trial, Common Law Courts, but “The Law of the Land” only means by the precedent of previous Jury Trials:- so 'The Law of the Land' in Britain is only by Jury Trial, Common Law!”
“In other words The Party Politicians’ own Statutes and The Bench Justices’ own court decisions; i.e. their own ‘Civil Law’ isn’t ‘The Law of The Land’, so which aught only to be applied if both the complainant and defendant have given informed consent to this actually privatised justice!”
.....
By contrast: all true Jury Trial, Common Law Jurisdiction is based on past precedent, or on informed consent. Since Common Law’s origins are in Saxon Law and Dane Law, which only used Foremen and Juries, not Judges at all, so Judges aren’t necessary to UK Trials. So regarding their retributive sentencing system, the Judges aught to be dispensed with by their Juries, for this maliciously divisive sentencing, and rather the Judges & Juries should be operating preventative and healing, also restorative and reconciliatory sentencing.
So both on this jurisdiction precedent, and on this malicious process cause, (or if the Jury has any other reasonable cause, such as a Judge’s excessive costs & obfuscations, or any other divisive, perversion of Common Law), then that Judge may be set aside by the Jury, and then it alone can decide the verdict and the sentencing; if it’s according either to precedent or to the informed consent of the complainant and defendant.
Conversely; if a Judge can reasonably show that a Jury has unreasonably departed both from precedent and consent, then that Jury’s decision should be appealable to a senior Judge, who then needs must call or recall a Jury, and so on.
So while today Party Politicians and Bench Justices and their legal associates comprehensively use malicious force and fraud to suppress the Common Law substituting communally divisive: verdicts, sentences and judgements in order for themselves continuously to rule us, and for their own profit and power.
by contrast ordinarily what should occur is a genuine Bicameral Justice System, where the judge by checking and complementing the Jury is useful to them, and vice versa, so then they both attain a mutual informed assent over the verdict and the sentencing, also in a continuum until the complainant and defendant also give their mutual informed consents both to the verdict and the sentencing. That's the way towards reconciliatory justice, for all the parties concerned.
....
2. Withhold ‘Civil Law’:- taxes, charges and fines, till our Parliaments, Councils & Courts are run by Lawful People under Jury Trial ‘Common Law’ Jurisdiction
“withhold from all of the above criminals their current comprehensively: defrauding and robbing also extorting and disseizing ‘Civil Law’:- taxes, fines, charges and, fees; until our Parliaments, Councils and Courts are not being run by such criminal oligarchies, but by lawful men and women, which is to say under the Common Law.”
Fn. Mainstream, National Party Politicians, Bench Justice, Lawyers, Barristers, Senior Police and their wealthy corporate clients, benefit from their privatized for profit ‘Civil Law’ Jurisdiction, so who ‘pull the wool’ so that the General Public don’t know how to access the not for profit, Common Law, so the latter pay all of the former, though the nose, in Civil Law extorted: taxes, fines, charges & fees to which no jury has consented.
for example consider the comprehensive UK Election Frauds described above, so there’s no lawful consent there. Then consider the nationalized and globalised corporatised utilities, all stolen via their Civil Law; & not via an informed consented to Civil Law Jurisdiction, also not under Common Law. Then also consider all the earlier Common Lands lost, again stolen, and again not via informed consented to Civil Law Jurisdiction, nor under Common Law.
Another example; consider the millions of pounds the UK Government now makes from parking & speed fines et al, where people have neither parked obstructively, nor driven carelessly of another person; so again regardless of whether the fine is lawful under Jury Trial, Common Law.
For example also consider how the Government got rid of all minor railways in the 1960’s forcing much of the population onto the roads each day; then created mass immigration as well, and all for their own, and their colleagues’ corporatist profits, without even an overt ‘by your leave’ in any manifestos; still less any Jury Trial Common Law consents, but all covertly.
So if you do look at what our National Party Politicians’ Government and most Bench Justices really do, the more you see that they are running a comprehensively criminal political and legal system in the UK, to benefit their own ever increasingly wealthy, corporatist oligarchies, and allied wealthy corporatist oligarchies.
[/b]our 2 Reform Articles Regarding
The Bench Justices' and Party Politicians' Comprehensive UK Jurisdiction: Frauds and Robberies
also Extortions and Disseizes.
The Bench Justices' and Party Politicians' Comprehensive UK Jurisdiction: Frauds and Robberies
also Extortions and Disseizes.
1. That every complainant and defendant has ready access to a Jury Trial; be it for a misdemeanour like a parking ticket, or a felony.
The Party Politicians and Bench Justice in practice rob and defraud us of our inalienable right to a Jury Trial, with less than 1% of UK court cases now referred to Jury Trial:- moreover at these trials the Party Politicians and Bench Justices maliciously apply retributive punishments, in order to divide, and therefore conquer us.
Their retributive sentencing is in order to divide rather than reconcile the complainants and the defendants, also the jury; which later is fraudulently dismissed regarding sentencing. So healing, restorative, reconciliatory justice isn’t their intent, but maliciously to divide us, and so conquer us, is their intent.
Their public pretext for comprehensively suppressing our rights to Jury Trial is the cost, but Juries should be as cheap as chips, since chips and tea is all that the Jurors need to perform; so it's the elaborate frauds and robberies of the Common Law rights of: the plaintiffs, and the defendants, also the jurors in order, to corrupt each jury trial, so that each finds only what the Bench Justices, and Party Politicians, also their legal accessories want it to find, that costs us all, the extra money.
So via malicious fraud and force over 99% of UK court cases are compelled through the Bench Justices’ & Party Politicians’ own corporate privatised for profit 'Civil Law Courts’, which have the same ‘divide and conquer’ the community practices.
....
By contrast Magna Carta; 1215; Section 39, reads:- “No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or deprived of his standing in any way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgment of his equals or by the law of the land”; and S.40 reads: “To no one will we sell, to no one deny or delay right or justice.”
“Some people point to Section 39’s last clause: “...or by the law of the land” and they believe that it allows The Party Politicians & Bench Justices to compel men and women to be tried by their ‘Civil Law Courts’, rather than by Jury Trial, Common Law Courts, but “The Law of the Land” only means by the precedent of previous Jury Trials:- so 'The Law of the Land' in Britain is only by Jury Trial, Common Law!”
“In other words The Party Politicians’ own Statutes and The Bench Justices’ own court decisions; i.e. their own ‘Civil Law’ isn’t ‘The Law of The Land’, so which aught only to be applied if both the complainant and defendant have given informed consent to this actually privatised justice!”
.....
By contrast: all true Jury Trial, Common Law Jurisdiction is based on past precedent, or on informed consent. Since Common Law’s origins are in Saxon Law and Dane Law, which only used Foremen and Juries, not Judges at all, so Judges aren’t necessary to UK Trials. So regarding their retributive sentencing system, the Judges aught to be dispensed with by their Juries, for this maliciously divisive sentencing, and rather the Judges & Juries should be operating preventative and healing, also restorative and reconciliatory sentencing.
So both on this jurisdiction precedent, and on this malicious process cause, (or if the Jury has any other reasonable cause, such as a Judge’s excessive costs & obfuscations, or any other divisive, perversion of Common Law), then that Judge may be set aside by the Jury, and then it alone can decide the verdict and the sentencing; if it’s according either to precedent or to the informed consent of the complainant and defendant.
Conversely; if a Judge can reasonably show that a Jury has unreasonably departed both from precedent and consent, then that Jury’s decision should be appealable to a senior Judge, who then needs must call or recall a Jury, and so on.
So while today Party Politicians and Bench Justices and their legal associates comprehensively use malicious force and fraud to suppress the Common Law substituting communally divisive: verdicts, sentences and judgements in order for themselves continuously to rule us, and for their own profit and power.
by contrast ordinarily what should occur is a genuine Bicameral Justice System, where the judge by checking and complementing the Jury is useful to them, and vice versa, so then they both attain a mutual informed assent over the verdict and the sentencing, also in a continuum until the complainant and defendant also give their mutual informed consents both to the verdict and the sentencing. That's the way towards reconciliatory justice, for all the parties concerned.
....
2. Withhold ‘Civil Law’:- taxes, charges and fines, till our Parliaments, Councils & Courts are run by Lawful People under Jury Trial ‘Common Law’ Jurisdiction
“withhold from all of the above criminals their current comprehensively: defrauding and robbing also extorting and disseizing ‘Civil Law’:- taxes, fines, charges and, fees; until our Parliaments, Councils and Courts are not being run by such criminal oligarchies, but by lawful men and women, which is to say under the Common Law.”
Fn. Mainstream, National Party Politicians, Bench Justice, Lawyers, Barristers, Senior Police and their wealthy corporate clients, benefit from their privatized for profit ‘Civil Law’ Jurisdiction, so who ‘pull the wool’ so that the General Public don’t know how to access the not for profit, Common Law, so the latter pay all of the former, though the nose, in Civil Law extorted: taxes, fines, charges & fees to which no jury has consented.
for example consider the comprehensive UK Election Frauds described above, so there’s no lawful consent there. Then consider the nationalized and globalised corporatised utilities, all stolen via their Civil Law; & not via an informed consented to Civil Law Jurisdiction, also not under Common Law. Then also consider all the earlier Common Lands lost, again stolen, and again not via informed consented to Civil Law Jurisdiction, nor under Common Law.
Another example; consider the millions of pounds the UK Government now makes from parking & speed fines et al, where people have neither parked obstructively, nor driven carelessly of another person; so again regardless of whether the fine is lawful under Jury Trial, Common Law.
For example also consider how the Government got rid of all minor railways in the 1960’s forcing much of the population onto the roads each day; then created mass immigration as well, and all for their own, and their colleagues’ corporatist profits, without even an overt ‘by your leave’ in any manifestos; still less any Jury Trial Common Law consents, but all covertly.
So if you do look at what our National Party Politicians’ Government and most Bench Justices really do, the more you see that they are running a comprehensively criminal political and legal system in the UK, to benefit their own ever increasingly wealthy, corporatist oligarchies, and allied wealthy corporatist oligarchies.
So never vote for anyone who’s not signed up to these 2 law reforms. If none are, then go to the polling station and spoil your ballot papers by writing boldly on each ballot paper either your own name and make it clear that you are voting only for yourself, (or if you want to remain anonymous just write something like:- “I am voting only for myself” ), and if you possibly can, then carefully photograph your ballot papers before placing them in the ballot box, as evidence that you did only vote for yourself and not for any of the above, because they are all organised ‘controlled’ fraudsters, because your elections and your law are being comprehensively defrauded and robbed, and none of the above have resigned and whistle-blown as they should. Lastly then consider contacting each other and us, so we can help create a Grand Jury in Watermoor in order lawfully to pursue these, because they are all organised ‘controlled’ fraudsters !
29/03/15
The Cirencester Town, Watermoor Ward Chartists’ - Contact: ------/------, on facebook on T:-----/-------- between ---- & ----
Cotswold Constituency Coordinator; Sandy Steel; T: 01285-850590 Ans Mach; james.steel1@virgin.net ; www.sandysteel.co.uk
,,,
.
[/div]