Post by Admin on Jan 25, 2015 16:36:25 GMT
A key to 15 libels by Wilts & GLOS Standard Editor; Skip Walker, & junior reporter; Elliot Cass, in their article about me, below (5 & 8 January 2015) :- 
= distortion; = fabrication; 
= omission:-
.
Poulton resident who has withheld council tax for 20 months facing further action by Cotswold District Council
First published Monday 5 January 2015 in Cotswolds news; online; together with a library picture of Cheltenham Magistrates Court. Last updated 09:39 Wednesday 7 January 2015, online; together with a picture of Mr Steel. . Printed edition Thursday 8 January 2015, by line 'By Elliot Cass'; no picture.
After refusing to pay his council tax for 20 months, Poulton resident Sandy Steel is facing more legal action.
Cotswold District Council (CDC) has been granted a liability order against Mr Steel which means money could be deducted from his earnings or benefits, or bailiffs could be sent to his address to recover the amount he owes. If this fails, Mr Steel could face up to three months in prison.
1. Actually I asserted my right to be tried under Common Law Jurisdiction; i.e. by Jury Trial, as opposed to trial under Civil Law Jurisdiction; i.e. under The Party Politicians’ Statutes, at a Bench Justices’ Hearing. I asserted this in two pre-case disclosure emails; (23/24.10.14), and on the day. So the above Civil Law: Hearing, Conviction and Liability Order are a malicious, treasonable process.
There are two official Jurisdictions in the UK:- there is The Jury Trial, Common Law Jurisdiction which is the Law of the Land, and there is Bench Justice, Civil Law Jurisdiction, which isn’t the Law of the Land, but rather is what The Party Politicians; via Statutes, and or their hireling Bench Justices adjudicate, so which is generally both in their own, and their wealthy corporate allies’ elitist interests, and so is covertly, systemically contrary to the Law of the Land.
Not a lot of people know that the UK’s Party Politicians, The Bench Justices and their corporatist, elitist allies like using their Civil Law abusively on the UK Public; systemically to: fraud, extort, enslave, disseize, torture, terrorise, main and murder, either for profit, or more gratuitously, all which is High Treason.
But I do. Moreover I know that it is this systemic inequity in the law, in actual practice, that creates most crimes, both high and low. Not a lot of people appear to know that fact either.
[So we the UK People need to dumb up about our leadership quite a lot, for if we don’t share out political and legal power equitably, we will continually get inequity. Jury Trial, Common Law is an equitable tool; so if we want equity in law, rather than inequity in law, then we should systematically use it.]
[So I won’t stop agitating about these systemic UK and Global: Fleecers, Mainers, Disseizers and Slaughterers until Common Law is established as the Law of the Land, not just in theory, but in practice:- so such Treasoners are all properly tried, so fully publically exposed, & fiscally humbled, then clemency.]
If either a defendant, or a complainant demands Trial: by Jury and or by Common Law, and or by The Law of the Land, then they aught not to be tried by Civil Law at all, which is only meant to be there for the litigants’ greater convenience, therefore only meant be conducted with their informed consents, rather than troubling to go to Jury Trial.
But in practice Civil Law is now a rabbit hole in The Law of the Land, through which over 99% of all UK defendants and complainants are both either defrauded and or duressed to fall, without their informed consents, and for the Party Politicians, Bench Justices and their corporatist elitist both public hirelings, and private allies’ profit and power.
This follows Mr Steel refusing to be tried by magistrates at Cheltenham Magistrates' Court, insisting that it was his right to be judged by a jury of his peers.
2. I didn’t; “insist on my right to be judged by a jury of my peers”, with its aristocratic innuendo. The Standard fabricated this snobbery in my speech that is neither in my two emails to the Court, nor in my email summary to the Standard, which it solicited from me. Rather on each occasion I demanded a Jury Trial under Common Law Jurisdiction; and I repudiated a Bench Justice Hearing, under Civil Law; Statutory Instrument Jurisdiction.
What the Standard are obfuscating here, by substituting an innuendo for what I really wrote and said, is that I demanded a Jury Trial, to the Court and to the Prosecutor, in two pre-case disclosure emails to each:- then when on the day they’d ignored that, then I asserted my Common Law right to record the Hearing, yet all which Common Law rights, they criminally covertly suppressed.
He said he refused to pay his council tax because he believes that the UK’s elections at every level are controlled by a cartel of organised parties which prevent independent candidates, such as himself, from winning.
(puke)3. That’s a lie:- I neither said, nor wrote that I’m withholding Council Tax due to being prevented by a cartel, from winning election. This fabricated reason, is a presumptuous one, hence it’s an in-substantive reason; also a non-criminal reason, so still more in-substantive; so it’s just a narcissistic reason to withhold Council Tax, so which Standard’s wholly fabricated reason, defames me.
(
)4. And the Standard’s article omits all but the last clause, of my real, stated, criminal indictment, counter-complaint reason to withhold Council Tax, which is in the first sentence of my solicited narrative summary to them, which reads:-
“Mr Sandy Steel of Poulton has withheld Council Tax for twenty months, and it’s on the grounds that The UK’s Public Elections are systematic-ally defrauded by a mainstream party politician’s cartel, and aided by civil servants:- also on the grounds of further, consequent systematic crimes, including that any complaints about such elitist crimes are either wholly suppressed, or facetiously dismissed. For his evidence see:- www.sandysteel.co.uk . “
()5. Furthermore:- note also that this Standard article omits all reference to the supporting evidence for my criminal counter-complaint reason to withhold Council Tax, thereby it makes the whole of my in fact criminal counter-com-plaint allegations seem wholly unsubstantiated, when in fact, all of my criminal counter allegations, in the paragraph above, are evidentially substantiated at:- www.sandysteel.co.uk and in some cases, by public documentary evidence.
He added: “Complaints about such elitist crimes are either wholly suppressed or facetiously dismissed.”
6. Still further:- this sentence wasn’t “added” by me at all:- rather it’s the last clause of the first sentence in my solicited summary to the Standard; (inset above), so this is very much part of my criminal indictment, counter-complaint reason, to withhold Council Tax, the rest of which reason they’ve omitted, and substituted their own defamatory alternative reason; (3 above).
The reason why the Standard’s article fabricated, that this final clause was “added” by me, in a separate sentence, is that this is the only time that they actually admit that I’m making any criminal counter-complaint, so by falsely saying “he added” this one criminal counter-complaint at the end of the other allegations, therefore The Standard obfuscates to the casual reader, both that all of the previous allegations are in fact, criminal allegations, so then it is these apparently non criminal earlier allegations that are being allegedly ‘wholly suppressed or facetiously dismissed’, which of course isn’t criminal to do.
So via omissions, then via this fabrication the Standard has wholly obfuscated the truth, then suggested to the casual reader, that the only criminal allegation by me, which they do admit, is not only wholly evidentially un-substantiated, but also in any case, a delusional allegation.
(puke)7. About the Standard's motive to libel me in this way. Though all of the above is a crude hatchet job, it’s likely a senior journalist’s defamatory handy work, not a junior, as they’re portraying. A junior wouldn’t be as cunning, and corrupt unless directed. So this is likely Skip Walker’s handy work. She did similar in an article in 2012; (15.11.2012), when I tried to tell the press what was really going on with regard to the systematic UK Election Fraud.
Of course to run this level of defamation means that the Standard Editor full well knows not just that they are comprehensively defaming me, but also the crimes that they’re thereby wholly covering up:- so those involved in this article are indictable for High Treason; which under Tony Blaire has been commuted to a non capital offence, but only under Civil Law, not Common Law.
I'm not suggesting that Skip Walker and all her UK Party Politician and Bench Justice co-conspirators should be strung up - rather how organised fraud including the systematic fraud both of the UK Elections and of the UK Common Law, which is usurpation of GOV and hence High Treason are now treated by the very GOV and Justice authorities involved, as not worth bothering about even registering the complainant's documented complaints. Meanwhile if a single low income person steals, or frauds £100 cash, off of several wealthier persons than themselves, that is potential Standard front page news, with a photo of the shamed felon. This what passes for fair, accurate reasonable journalism today.
During the hearing, Mr Steel produced a camera and tried to film the clerk and the magistrate but was told he was in breach of the law which forbids the filming of court hearings.
(puke)8. This is a gross misrepresentation. The Standard knows both from Paras 3 & 4 of my case summary to them, which they solicited from me; (attached), and from that summary’s linked website evidence; (see its forum’s Appeal, Complaint and Claim, NB9), also from the Echo articles, that I wasn’t trying to film the Clerk and Magistrates, rather I turned on a small camera, and placed it on the balustrade to the side of the Public Gallery at the back of the Court to record my trial verbatim, and from where if they’d been in shot the Clerk and Magistrates would only have been small gesticulating, and moving figures,
However it was enough to show that the Magistrates and Prosecutor were already running a Secret Hearing by continuously using a deliberate undertone to each other, in order that I and all of those on the Public Benches couldn’t hear a word, even after my asking them to speak up, which crime they can only get away with, because they suppress even their staff to make verbatim records of the Court Cases.
Moreover I gave them; and not in undertones, like them, a proper Common Law, point of law justification, for turning on my camera, which was:-
‘No Jury has ever condemned a defendant for recording their own trial verbatim, and since Jury Trial Common Law Jurisdiction is the Law of the Land in the UK, so it is lawful for defendants to make a verbatim record of their own Trials/Hearings’.
The Clerk hadn’t got any answer for that. That’s the true reason why they abandoned the Court silently. I had exposed their systemic criminal malicious processes, where they systemically deny Jury Trials, and systemically suppress Court Transcripts, claiming it’s the law too, when it’s really a criminal, malicious process. They’re not just a bit criminal, they’re systemically criminal; [just like their mainstream party politician co-conspirators in public crime, and just like those corporatist media editors, who defame or ignore those who reveal it].
When the magistrate and clerk left the court to avoid being filmed, Mr Steel said he had dismissed his own case and also left the courtroom.
(puke)9. The magistrates and clerk didn’t state any reason for their leaving, but left silently. [They knew that if they stayed to argue at all, that my Common Law argument trumps their Civil Law one so the truth is then out; & evidently I did dismiss my own case because the GLOS Echo’s Court Reporter; (Aled Thomas), was there, and titled his first article; “The Man Who Dismissed His Own Case”.
So the Standard knows I dismissed my own case:- and if they don’t know that Common Law trumps Statutory Law, so that that it is the real reason why the Magistrates silently left the Court, then they’re ignoramuses and defamers.
I also dismissed the case lawfully because I was the most senior person left in the case; the Magistrates and their Clerk having abandoned the Court without any explanation. All of this process is confirmed from the GLOS Echo Court Reporter’s two Court Reports who was there; (see online under ‘Sandy Steel’).
However, he then complained that decisions were being made in secret when the court reconvened to conclude the case in his absence.
(puke)10. Once I’d made my Common Law points, the Magistrates and Clerk silently abandoned the court without giving any reason, and they didn’t say when or whether they would be reconvening, so of course I wasn’t there, when they reconvened, and of course that was their intention. So of course it was a Secret Hearing, and of course they’re operating a systemic, criminal malicious process.
He said that since no jury had ever convicted someone of recording a court case, he considered his filming of the hearing to be lawful.
(puke)11a. I didn’t do any considering about it, rather I stated the Law of the Land, on the matter - I said:-
‘No Jury has ever condemned a defendant for recording their own trial verbatim, and since Jury Trial Common Law Jurisdiction is the Law of the Land in the UK, so it is lawful for defendants to make a verbatim record of their own Trials/Hearings’.
This was when the Court Clerk nodded to the Magistrates, and they all silently abandoned the Court. It was only much later that they gave a camera reason to the press, which is a malicious, criminal unlawful reason as my Common Law, point of law to them at the time; (inset above), clearly demonstrated in court. Indeed the Magistrates immediate silent departure demonstrated that, but that’s not to miss this is really about their suppressing such as my testimony of systemic UK public election fraud, which is a very criminal suppression
11b. In other words: if it was really unlawful for a defendant to record their own Trial/Case, as I did, they’d have pursued it, and dragged me up in front of a Jury Trial - but they full well know that once a Jury heard that they suppress all verbatim transcripts in their Magistrates Courts, and clearly in order that they aren’t publically accountable, also then suppress Jury Trials, and hold secret trials instead, where defendants can’t attend, or supply any defence, the Jury likely would acquit me, and expect these magistrates and clerk to be indicted, and whoever instructed them, and whatever media that covered it up by comprehensively defaming me.
Then effectively UK Magistrates Courts would start to be Public Courts, where people could demand a Jury Trial, and not have that right suppressed, and not have all Verbatim Court Case Records, even of their having made such a demand to the Court, suppressed too, so that the systematic suppression of the Law of the Land, isn’t being conducted overtly, but covertly.
So it was in order to prevent such Lawful Justice occurring, and then it revealing the systematic criminality of the UK Government, and of much UK Justice too:- that’s why they ran away, and conducted a criminal Secret Trial of me instead, and they operated a wholly Secret Trial of me last year too.
A spokesman for CDC said: “Mr Steel chose to leave the magistrates' court on October 27 and was not present when the liability order was granted, but this was carried out in public in line with accepted legal practices.
(puke)12a. The Court was silently abandoned by the Magistrates and Clerk and they did so when I made The Point of Law, that a defendant recording their own case verbatim, has never been condemned by a Jury, therefore that it is lawful for the defendant to record their case, according to The Common Law, which is the Law of the Land, and so trumps all Civil Law, such as Contempt of Court Acts.
Also note the anonymity of the official ‘spokesman’ which often prefaces their delivering fraudulently misleading public information, and recall how the UK corporatist press colludes in such unattributed official briefings, all the time. Then note this official’s phrase – "this was carried out ... in line with accepted legal practices". Strictly speaking the only law in this country is The Common Law, and when a decision is made under Common Law it is described as being ‘according to law’:- so what this specious spokesman is really saying to people in the know, regarding saying: “...accepted legal practices” is that they didn’t behave according to Law, in this case, and they don’t care, as the Public doesn’t get it.
That’s why their statement is unattributed, as that impedes anyone asking them whether this Secret Hearing was ‘according to law’ and recording their squirming out of that question, because such Secret Trials/Hearings are clearly unlawful; i.e. clearly unsanctioned by any jury trials.
12b. On my forum you will see that I have considered the consequences of people asserting their right to Jury Trial Common Law Jurisdiction in any case:- globalfraudstates.proboards.com/thread/9/appeal-complaint-claim-person-draft2 ( See NBs 1-8 ) which my solicited summary to the Standard; (attached) linked to, so they full well knew my full lawful argument, but chose to present it as ‘illegal’.
Civil Law has been developed by the Party Politicians and by Bench Justices in order to deprive, we The People, of the Common Law and for the formers’ profit and power, also for their wealthy allies profit and power who are mostly incorporated. So I’m simply asserting my right not be enslaved to their systematically criminal, elitist Civil Law, by demanding a Jury Trial, which is to say, that I’m asserting my inalienable right to be tried by the Law of the Land.
“Mr Steel has spoken to one of our legal team about appealing the decision to grant the liability order, and was informed that he had a 21 day time limit to appeal.
(puke)13. This was malicious, fraudulent, extortive and indeed treasonable advice, as in my pre-case disclosures to The Prosecution, and to The Court I repudiated the Bench Justices, Statutory Civil Law Jurisdiction and demanded to be tried by Jury Trial, Common Law Jurisdiction, and at Court I also asserted Common Law Jurisdiction, with regard to my right to have a verbatim record of my trial.
That’s when they abandoned their malicious, fraudulent extortive attempt to try me under Bench Justice, Statutory Civil Law Jurisdiction rather than Jury Trial Jurisdiction and silently left Court; so they had, and have no Jurisdiction.
“The next stage in the process is for the council to send the liability order to enforcement agents who will contact Mr Steel.”
()14. The one thing the Cheltenham Magistrates have been consistent about, is their malicious, extortive, fraudulent and treasonable process; so I wait to see what these do next. If they illegally fine me or remove my effects, I’ll fine them many fold times more. If they falsely imprison me, I’ll find them and fine them or imprison them for that too. Under common law everyone has a right to react proportionately sufficiently to prevent unlawful behaviour to themselves. That’s how Common Law works; and no one is above it. The Jury is arbiter.
Summary:- The Standard has misrepresented the Court’s comprehensively, malicious and treasonable processes to me, as being wholly lawful, also it has comprehensively: fabricated, omitted and distorted regarding my criminal counter-complaint, also misrepresenting it to be wholly un-evidenced, hence wholly in-substantive, and so thence delusional and narcissistic, also criminal
This is despite the obvious systemic, malicious processes of the Court, such as its covert denial both of a verbatim Court Case transcript to the defendant, and of a Jury Trial to the defendant, also the escalation to a Secret Hearing where the defendant wasn’t allowed to present any defence, for the 2nd year running
Conclusion. The Standard’s comprehensive theft of my reputation, by the 15 libels (above), and their doing similar in 2012; (15.11.2012), is to prevent the Public listening to what I’m really evidencing at : www.sandysteel.co.uk and at my forum: globalfraudstates.proboards.com/ regarding exactly how the mainstream Party Politicians and their allies, systemically defraud the UK’s Public Elections, also about the Bench Justices’ systematic Secret Trials under Civil Law, to cover up, rather than sending such as me, for Jury Trials as is our right, where we’d be allowed to present our criminal-counter complaint allegations and evidence, also in open courts, and which allow verbatim, court transcripts.
The UK’s mainstream Party Politicians, their Bench Justices, & their corporate allies need to suppress such as my evidence, re that they systemically defraud both the UK’s Public Elections and the UK’s Law, particularly because if such a story breaks to the General Public before the 2015 Elections, then there likely won’t be a mainstream Party Politician, or a Bench Justice left, unless they rig the now computerised UK Postal Counts, the Republican Party having already been caught manufacturing such software; clearly with this very intent in mind.
In my case the Standard editor is also well aware that I was the Cotswold Constituency Independent Candidate in 2010, so she and her criminal Party Politician and Bench Justice allies know that if anyone is liable to expose their systematic criminality here, it’s me. So their criminally malicious trials, and convictions, also comprehensive libels, all intend to knock me out of affecting their no doubt similarly, systematically criminal conduct of The 2015 Elections.
(The key, for the UK’s Party Politicians and Bench Justices and their corporate media and other corporate allies is that the UK Electorate don’t catch on, to who is telling the truth, and who always systemically deceives them in order systematically both to fleece them, and or to do worse, and particularly before the 2015 Elections. So of course, what the Standard is involved is High Treason)
If they can all fool the UK Electorate yet again, in 2015, then they can generate a war, to distract the Public; as Blaire did and as Cameron has already attempted, also as they’ve often done before. These people are all guilty of High Treason. The General Public doesn’t yet see how they are governed systematically cynically, or why, or what to do about it. Still less does The General Public yet see the comprehensive nature of the planned fleecing and slaughtering of them, even less what the UK and the World would be like, if released from these elite occult cult forces.
For a current key occult extortion example; The World Oil Price has dropped by over 50% without any official explanation, and just before the 2015 UK Election and no-one in the Global mainstream media has said the obvious truth, which is that it's a vast electoral bribe to the UK Public to vote for the criminal Party Politician & Bench Justice status quo, still less that this vast bribe is little compared to how low energy prices aught to be if the Energy Market wasn't systematically rigged by the same elitist occult party politician & bench justice forces, also by their elite allies.
So in order to begin to see such vast truths clearly, you require to dig both either into the eighty plus links at the bottom of page 3 of my website: www.sandytsteel.co.uk and or on similar independent sites, and or methodically to develop your own Global view, because the corporate media, is systematically controlled by such elitist, occult forces, which prevent the telling of such plain truths to the General Public, and both by such acute ommissions to tell the truth, and by comprehensive defamations.
I’m looking for a prominent retraction, of what is evidently a comprehensively libellous article, in which 3 sections are fabricated by the Standard to indicate that I’m delusionally, narcissistically motivated while my real case is comprehensively misrepresented by omissions and distortions, all of which obfuscate my criminal counter-complaint allegation, and entirely suppress its evidence, and all of which case was linked, in my 750 word Case Summary (attached) which the Standard solicited from me. So this article isn’t just libellous, it’s treasonable. Fin: 25.01.2015.
= distortion; = fabrication; 
= omission:-.
Poulton resident who has withheld council tax for 20 months facing further action by Cotswold District Council
First published Monday 5 January 2015 in Cotswolds news; online; together with a library picture of Cheltenham Magistrates Court. Last updated 09:39 Wednesday 7 January 2015, online; together with a picture of Mr Steel. . Printed edition Thursday 8 January 2015, by line 'By Elliot Cass'; no picture.
After refusing to pay his council tax for 20 months, Poulton resident Sandy Steel is facing more legal action.
Cotswold District Council (CDC) has been granted a liability order against Mr Steel which means money could be deducted from his earnings or benefits, or bailiffs could be sent to his address to recover the amount he owes. If this fails, Mr Steel could face up to three months in prison.
1. Actually I asserted my right to be tried under Common Law Jurisdiction; i.e. by Jury Trial, as opposed to trial under Civil Law Jurisdiction; i.e. under The Party Politicians’ Statutes, at a Bench Justices’ Hearing. I asserted this in two pre-case disclosure emails; (23/24.10.14), and on the day. So the above Civil Law: Hearing, Conviction and Liability Order are a malicious, treasonable process. There are two official Jurisdictions in the UK:- there is The Jury Trial, Common Law Jurisdiction which is the Law of the Land, and there is Bench Justice, Civil Law Jurisdiction, which isn’t the Law of the Land, but rather is what The Party Politicians; via Statutes, and or their hireling Bench Justices adjudicate, so which is generally both in their own, and their wealthy corporate allies’ elitist interests, and so is covertly, systemically contrary to the Law of the Land.
Not a lot of people know that the UK’s Party Politicians, The Bench Justices and their corporatist, elitist allies like using their Civil Law abusively on the UK Public; systemically to: fraud, extort, enslave, disseize, torture, terrorise, main and murder, either for profit, or more gratuitously, all which is High Treason.
But I do. Moreover I know that it is this systemic inequity in the law, in actual practice, that creates most crimes, both high and low. Not a lot of people appear to know that fact either.
[So we the UK People need to dumb up about our leadership quite a lot, for if we don’t share out political and legal power equitably, we will continually get inequity. Jury Trial, Common Law is an equitable tool; so if we want equity in law, rather than inequity in law, then we should systematically use it.]
[So I won’t stop agitating about these systemic UK and Global: Fleecers, Mainers, Disseizers and Slaughterers until Common Law is established as the Law of the Land, not just in theory, but in practice:- so such Treasoners are all properly tried, so fully publically exposed, & fiscally humbled, then clemency.]
If either a defendant, or a complainant demands Trial: by Jury and or by Common Law, and or by The Law of the Land, then they aught not to be tried by Civil Law at all, which is only meant to be there for the litigants’ greater convenience, therefore only meant be conducted with their informed consents, rather than troubling to go to Jury Trial.
But in practice Civil Law is now a rabbit hole in The Law of the Land, through which over 99% of all UK defendants and complainants are both either defrauded and or duressed to fall, without their informed consents, and for the Party Politicians, Bench Justices and their corporatist elitist both public hirelings, and private allies’ profit and power.
This follows Mr Steel refusing to be tried by magistrates at Cheltenham Magistrates' Court, insisting that it was his right to be judged by a jury of his peers.
2. I didn’t; “insist on my right to be judged by a jury of my peers”, with its aristocratic innuendo. The Standard fabricated this snobbery in my speech that is neither in my two emails to the Court, nor in my email summary to the Standard, which it solicited from me. Rather on each occasion I demanded a Jury Trial under Common Law Jurisdiction; and I repudiated a Bench Justice Hearing, under Civil Law; Statutory Instrument Jurisdiction. What the Standard are obfuscating here, by substituting an innuendo for what I really wrote and said, is that I demanded a Jury Trial, to the Court and to the Prosecutor, in two pre-case disclosure emails to each:- then when on the day they’d ignored that, then I asserted my Common Law right to record the Hearing, yet all which Common Law rights, they criminally covertly suppressed.
He said he refused to pay his council tax because he believes that the UK’s elections at every level are controlled by a cartel of organised parties which prevent independent candidates, such as himself, from winning.
(puke)3. That’s a lie:- I neither said, nor wrote that I’m withholding Council Tax due to being prevented by a cartel, from winning election. This fabricated reason, is a presumptuous one, hence it’s an in-substantive reason; also a non-criminal reason, so still more in-substantive; so it’s just a narcissistic reason to withhold Council Tax, so which Standard’s wholly fabricated reason, defames me. (
)4. And the Standard’s article omits all but the last clause, of my real, stated, criminal indictment, counter-complaint reason to withhold Council Tax, which is in the first sentence of my solicited narrative summary to them, which reads:- “Mr Sandy Steel of Poulton has withheld Council Tax for twenty months, and it’s on the grounds that The UK’s Public Elections are systematic-ally defrauded by a mainstream party politician’s cartel, and aided by civil servants:- also on the grounds of further, consequent systematic crimes, including that any complaints about such elitist crimes are either wholly suppressed, or facetiously dismissed. For his evidence see:- www.sandysteel.co.uk . “
(
)5. Furthermore:- note also that this Standard article omits all reference to the supporting evidence for my criminal counter-complaint reason to withhold Council Tax, thereby it makes the whole of my in fact criminal counter-com-plaint allegations seem wholly unsubstantiated, when in fact, all of my criminal counter allegations, in the paragraph above, are evidentially substantiated at:- www.sandysteel.co.uk and in some cases, by public documentary evidence. He added: “Complaints about such elitist crimes are either wholly suppressed or facetiously dismissed.”
6. Still further:- this sentence wasn’t “added” by me at all:- rather it’s the last clause of the first sentence in my solicited summary to the Standard; (inset above), so this is very much part of my criminal indictment, counter-complaint reason, to withhold Council Tax, the rest of which reason they’ve omitted, and substituted their own defamatory alternative reason; (3 above).The reason why the Standard’s article fabricated, that this final clause was “added” by me, in a separate sentence, is that this is the only time that they actually admit that I’m making any criminal counter-complaint, so by falsely saying “he added” this one criminal counter-complaint at the end of the other allegations, therefore The Standard obfuscates to the casual reader, both that all of the previous allegations are in fact, criminal allegations, so then it is these apparently non criminal earlier allegations that are being allegedly ‘wholly suppressed or facetiously dismissed’, which of course isn’t criminal to do.
So via omissions, then via this fabrication the Standard has wholly obfuscated the truth, then suggested to the casual reader, that the only criminal allegation by me, which they do admit, is not only wholly evidentially un-substantiated, but also in any case, a delusional allegation.
(puke)7. About the Standard's motive to libel me in this way. Though all of the above is a crude hatchet job, it’s likely a senior journalist’s defamatory handy work, not a junior, as they’re portraying. A junior wouldn’t be as cunning, and corrupt unless directed. So this is likely Skip Walker’s handy work. She did similar in an article in 2012; (15.11.2012), when I tried to tell the press what was really going on with regard to the systematic UK Election Fraud. Of course to run this level of defamation means that the Standard Editor full well knows not just that they are comprehensively defaming me, but also the crimes that they’re thereby wholly covering up:- so those involved in this article are indictable for High Treason; which under Tony Blaire has been commuted to a non capital offence, but only under Civil Law, not Common Law.
I'm not suggesting that Skip Walker and all her UK Party Politician and Bench Justice co-conspirators should be strung up - rather how organised fraud including the systematic fraud both of the UK Elections and of the UK Common Law, which is usurpation of GOV and hence High Treason are now treated by the very GOV and Justice authorities involved, as not worth bothering about even registering the complainant's documented complaints. Meanwhile if a single low income person steals, or frauds £100 cash, off of several wealthier persons than themselves, that is potential Standard front page news, with a photo of the shamed felon. This what passes for fair, accurate reasonable journalism today.
During the hearing, Mr Steel produced a camera and tried to film the clerk and the magistrate but was told he was in breach of the law which forbids the filming of court hearings.
(puke)8. This is a gross misrepresentation. The Standard knows both from Paras 3 & 4 of my case summary to them, which they solicited from me; (attached), and from that summary’s linked website evidence; (see its forum’s Appeal, Complaint and Claim, NB9), also from the Echo articles, that I wasn’t trying to film the Clerk and Magistrates, rather I turned on a small camera, and placed it on the balustrade to the side of the Public Gallery at the back of the Court to record my trial verbatim, and from where if they’d been in shot the Clerk and Magistrates would only have been small gesticulating, and moving figures,
However it was enough to show that the Magistrates and Prosecutor were already running a Secret Hearing by continuously using a deliberate undertone to each other, in order that I and all of those on the Public Benches couldn’t hear a word, even after my asking them to speak up, which crime they can only get away with, because they suppress even their staff to make verbatim records of the Court Cases.
Moreover I gave them; and not in undertones, like them, a proper Common Law, point of law justification, for turning on my camera, which was:-
‘No Jury has ever condemned a defendant for recording their own trial verbatim, and since Jury Trial Common Law Jurisdiction is the Law of the Land in the UK, so it is lawful for defendants to make a verbatim record of their own Trials/Hearings’.
The Clerk hadn’t got any answer for that. That’s the true reason why they abandoned the Court silently. I had exposed their systemic criminal malicious processes, where they systemically deny Jury Trials, and systemically suppress Court Transcripts, claiming it’s the law too, when it’s really a criminal, malicious process. They’re not just a bit criminal, they’re systemically criminal; [just like their mainstream party politician co-conspirators in public crime, and just like those corporatist media editors, who defame or ignore those who reveal it].
When the magistrate and clerk left the court to avoid being filmed, Mr Steel said he had dismissed his own case and also left the courtroom.
(puke)9. The magistrates and clerk didn’t state any reason for their leaving, but left silently. [They knew that if they stayed to argue at all, that my Common Law argument trumps their Civil Law one so the truth is then out; & evidently I did dismiss my own case because the GLOS Echo’s Court Reporter; (Aled Thomas), was there, and titled his first article; “The Man Who Dismissed His Own Case”.
So the Standard knows I dismissed my own case:- and if they don’t know that Common Law trumps Statutory Law, so that that it is the real reason why the Magistrates silently left the Court, then they’re ignoramuses and defamers.
I also dismissed the case lawfully because I was the most senior person left in the case; the Magistrates and their Clerk having abandoned the Court without any explanation. All of this process is confirmed from the GLOS Echo Court Reporter’s two Court Reports who was there; (see online under ‘Sandy Steel’).
However, he then complained that decisions were being made in secret when the court reconvened to conclude the case in his absence.
(puke)10. Once I’d made my Common Law points, the Magistrates and Clerk silently abandoned the court without giving any reason, and they didn’t say when or whether they would be reconvening, so of course I wasn’t there, when they reconvened, and of course that was their intention. So of course it was a Secret Hearing, and of course they’re operating a systemic, criminal malicious process.
He said that since no jury had ever convicted someone of recording a court case, he considered his filming of the hearing to be lawful.
(puke)11a. I didn’t do any considering about it, rather I stated the Law of the Land, on the matter - I said:- ‘No Jury has ever condemned a defendant for recording their own trial verbatim, and since Jury Trial Common Law Jurisdiction is the Law of the Land in the UK, so it is lawful for defendants to make a verbatim record of their own Trials/Hearings’.
This was when the Court Clerk nodded to the Magistrates, and they all silently abandoned the Court. It was only much later that they gave a camera reason to the press, which is a malicious, criminal unlawful reason as my Common Law, point of law to them at the time; (inset above), clearly demonstrated in court. Indeed the Magistrates immediate silent departure demonstrated that, but that’s not to miss this is really about their suppressing such as my testimony of systemic UK public election fraud, which is a very criminal suppression
11b. In other words: if it was really unlawful for a defendant to record their own Trial/Case, as I did, they’d have pursued it, and dragged me up in front of a Jury Trial - but they full well know that once a Jury heard that they suppress all verbatim transcripts in their Magistrates Courts, and clearly in order that they aren’t publically accountable, also then suppress Jury Trials, and hold secret trials instead, where defendants can’t attend, or supply any defence, the Jury likely would acquit me, and expect these magistrates and clerk to be indicted, and whoever instructed them, and whatever media that covered it up by comprehensively defaming me.
Then effectively UK Magistrates Courts would start to be Public Courts, where people could demand a Jury Trial, and not have that right suppressed, and not have all Verbatim Court Case Records, even of their having made such a demand to the Court, suppressed too, so that the systematic suppression of the Law of the Land, isn’t being conducted overtly, but covertly.
So it was in order to prevent such Lawful Justice occurring, and then it revealing the systematic criminality of the UK Government, and of much UK Justice too:- that’s why they ran away, and conducted a criminal Secret Trial of me instead, and they operated a wholly Secret Trial of me last year too.
A spokesman for CDC said: “Mr Steel chose to leave the magistrates' court on October 27 and was not present when the liability order was granted, but this was carried out in public in line with accepted legal practices.
(puke)12a. The Court was silently abandoned by the Magistrates and Clerk and they did so when I made The Point of Law, that a defendant recording their own case verbatim, has never been condemned by a Jury, therefore that it is lawful for the defendant to record their case, according to The Common Law, which is the Law of the Land, and so trumps all Civil Law, such as Contempt of Court Acts.
Also note the anonymity of the official ‘spokesman’ which often prefaces their delivering fraudulently misleading public information, and recall how the UK corporatist press colludes in such unattributed official briefings, all the time. Then note this official’s phrase – "this was carried out ... in line with accepted legal practices". Strictly speaking the only law in this country is The Common Law, and when a decision is made under Common Law it is described as being ‘according to law’:- so what this specious spokesman is really saying to people in the know, regarding saying: “...accepted legal practices” is that they didn’t behave according to Law, in this case, and they don’t care, as the Public doesn’t get it.
That’s why their statement is unattributed, as that impedes anyone asking them whether this Secret Hearing was ‘according to law’ and recording their squirming out of that question, because such Secret Trials/Hearings are clearly unlawful; i.e. clearly unsanctioned by any jury trials.
12b. On my forum you will see that I have considered the consequences of people asserting their right to Jury Trial Common Law Jurisdiction in any case:- globalfraudstates.proboards.com/thread/9/appeal-complaint-claim-person-draft2 ( See NBs 1-8 ) which my solicited summary to the Standard; (attached) linked to, so they full well knew my full lawful argument, but chose to present it as ‘illegal’.
Civil Law has been developed by the Party Politicians and by Bench Justices in order to deprive, we The People, of the Common Law and for the formers’ profit and power, also for their wealthy allies profit and power who are mostly incorporated. So I’m simply asserting my right not be enslaved to their systematically criminal, elitist Civil Law, by demanding a Jury Trial, which is to say, that I’m asserting my inalienable right to be tried by the Law of the Land.
“Mr Steel has spoken to one of our legal team about appealing the decision to grant the liability order, and was informed that he had a 21 day time limit to appeal.
(puke)13. This was malicious, fraudulent, extortive and indeed treasonable advice, as in my pre-case disclosures to The Prosecution, and to The Court I repudiated the Bench Justices, Statutory Civil Law Jurisdiction and demanded to be tried by Jury Trial, Common Law Jurisdiction, and at Court I also asserted Common Law Jurisdiction, with regard to my right to have a verbatim record of my trial.
That’s when they abandoned their malicious, fraudulent extortive attempt to try me under Bench Justice, Statutory Civil Law Jurisdiction rather than Jury Trial Jurisdiction and silently left Court; so they had, and have no Jurisdiction.
“The next stage in the process is for the council to send the liability order to enforcement agents who will contact Mr Steel.”
(
)14. The one thing the Cheltenham Magistrates have been consistent about, is their malicious, extortive, fraudulent and treasonable process; so I wait to see what these do next. If they illegally fine me or remove my effects, I’ll fine them many fold times more. If they falsely imprison me, I’ll find them and fine them or imprison them for that too. Under common law everyone has a right to react proportionately sufficiently to prevent unlawful behaviour to themselves. That’s how Common Law works; and no one is above it. The Jury is arbiter.Summary:- The Standard has misrepresented the Court’s comprehensively, malicious and treasonable processes to me, as being wholly lawful, also it has comprehensively: fabricated, omitted and distorted regarding my criminal counter-complaint, also misrepresenting it to be wholly un-evidenced, hence wholly in-substantive, and so thence delusional and narcissistic, also criminal
This is despite the obvious systemic, malicious processes of the Court, such as its covert denial both of a verbatim Court Case transcript to the defendant, and of a Jury Trial to the defendant, also the escalation to a Secret Hearing where the defendant wasn’t allowed to present any defence, for the 2nd year running
Conclusion. The Standard’s comprehensive theft of my reputation, by the 15 libels (above), and their doing similar in 2012; (15.11.2012), is to prevent the Public listening to what I’m really evidencing at : www.sandysteel.co.uk and at my forum: globalfraudstates.proboards.com/ regarding exactly how the mainstream Party Politicians and their allies, systemically defraud the UK’s Public Elections, also about the Bench Justices’ systematic Secret Trials under Civil Law, to cover up, rather than sending such as me, for Jury Trials as is our right, where we’d be allowed to present our criminal-counter complaint allegations and evidence, also in open courts, and which allow verbatim, court transcripts.
The UK’s mainstream Party Politicians, their Bench Justices, & their corporate allies need to suppress such as my evidence, re that they systemically defraud both the UK’s Public Elections and the UK’s Law, particularly because if such a story breaks to the General Public before the 2015 Elections, then there likely won’t be a mainstream Party Politician, or a Bench Justice left, unless they rig the now computerised UK Postal Counts, the Republican Party having already been caught manufacturing such software; clearly with this very intent in mind.
In my case the Standard editor is also well aware that I was the Cotswold Constituency Independent Candidate in 2010, so she and her criminal Party Politician and Bench Justice allies know that if anyone is liable to expose their systematic criminality here, it’s me. So their criminally malicious trials, and convictions, also comprehensive libels, all intend to knock me out of affecting their no doubt similarly, systematically criminal conduct of The 2015 Elections.
(The key, for the UK’s Party Politicians and Bench Justices and their corporate media and other corporate allies is that the UK Electorate don’t catch on, to who is telling the truth, and who always systemically deceives them in order systematically both to fleece them, and or to do worse, and particularly before the 2015 Elections. So of course, what the Standard is involved is High Treason)
If they can all fool the UK Electorate yet again, in 2015, then they can generate a war, to distract the Public; as Blaire did and as Cameron has already attempted, also as they’ve often done before. These people are all guilty of High Treason. The General Public doesn’t yet see how they are governed systematically cynically, or why, or what to do about it. Still less does The General Public yet see the comprehensive nature of the planned fleecing and slaughtering of them, even less what the UK and the World would be like, if released from these elite occult cult forces.
For a current key occult extortion example; The World Oil Price has dropped by over 50% without any official explanation, and just before the 2015 UK Election and no-one in the Global mainstream media has said the obvious truth, which is that it's a vast electoral bribe to the UK Public to vote for the criminal Party Politician & Bench Justice status quo, still less that this vast bribe is little compared to how low energy prices aught to be if the Energy Market wasn't systematically rigged by the same elitist occult party politician & bench justice forces, also by their elite allies.
So in order to begin to see such vast truths clearly, you require to dig both either into the eighty plus links at the bottom of page 3 of my website: www.sandytsteel.co.uk and or on similar independent sites, and or methodically to develop your own Global view, because the corporate media, is systematically controlled by such elitist, occult forces, which prevent the telling of such plain truths to the General Public, and both by such acute ommissions to tell the truth, and by comprehensive defamations.
I’m looking for a prominent retraction, of what is evidently a comprehensively libellous article, in which 3 sections are fabricated by the Standard to indicate that I’m delusionally, narcissistically motivated while my real case is comprehensively misrepresented by omissions and distortions, all of which obfuscate my criminal counter-complaint allegation, and entirely suppress its evidence, and all of which case was linked, in my 750 word Case Summary (attached) which the Standard solicited from me. So this article isn’t just libellous, it’s treasonable. Fin: 25.01.2015.